EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Chengtang Cao
dblp:289/6838
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-6725-4986ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | A novel biometric authentication scheme with privacy protection based on SVM and ZKPabstractBiometric authentication is a very convenient and user-friendly method. The popularity of this method requires strong privacy-preserving technology to prevent the disclosure of template information. Most of the existing privacy protection technologies rely on classic encryption techniques, such as homomorphic encryption, which incur huge system overhead and cannot be popularized. To address these issues, we propose a novel biometric authentication scheme with privacy protection based on support vector machine and zero knowledge proof (BioAu–SVM+ZKP). BioAu–SVM+ZKP allows users to authenticate themselves to different service providers without disclosing any biometric template information. The evidence is generated through the zero-knowledge proof utilizing polynomial commitments. Our approach for generating a unique and repeatable biometric identifier from the user’s fingerprint image leverages the multi-classification property of SVM. Notably, our scheme not only reduces the communication overhead but also provides the privacy protection features. Besides, the communication overhead of BioAu–SVM+ZKP is constant. We have simulated the authentication scheme on the common dataset NIST, analyzed the performance and proved the security. Chunjie Guo, Lin You, Gengran Hu, Sheng-Guo Wang, Chengtang Cao |
Comput. Secur. | 6 |
| 2021 | Fuzzy Identity-Based Ring Signature from LatticesabstractIn this paper, a construction of a fuzzy identity-based ring signature scheme (LFIBRS) is proposed. Our LFIBRS combines the characteristics of both the fuzzy identity-based signature (FIBS) and the ring signature. On the one hand, a signature issued under an identity ID can be verified by any identity ID ′ that is “close enough” to the identity ID . Since biometric identification is the well-known most popular and reliable identification method, our LFIBRS can be applied in such a situation whenever it is required for official audit or supervision that the signer’s real identity is needed to be authenticated. On the other hand, LFIBRS provides anonymity under the random oracle model. In addition, LFIBRS provides unforgeability under the small integer solution (SIS) lattice hardness assumption which can resist large-scale quantum computer attacks in the future. Chengtang Cao, Lin You, Gengran Hu |
Secur. Commun. Networks | 1 |
| 2021 | A Blockchain-Based Hierarchical Authentication Scheme for Multiserver ArchitectureabstractIn a multiserver architecture, authentication schemes play an important role in the secure communication of the system. In many multiserver authentication schemes, the security of the mutual authentications among the participants is based on the security of the registration center’s private key. This centralized architecture can create security risks due to the leakage of the registration center’s private key. Blockchain technology, with its decentralized, tamper-proof, and distributed features, can provide a new solution for multiserver authentication schemes. In a lot of multiserver authentication schemes, users’ permission is generally controlled by the registration center (RC), but these permission control methods cannot be applied in the decentralized blockchain system. In this paper, a blockchain-based authentication scheme for multiserver architecture is proposed. Our scheme provides a hierarchical authentication method to solve the problems of user permission control and user revocation caused by no registration center. The security of our scheme is formally proved under the random oracle model. According to our analysis, our scheme is resistant to attacks such as impersonation attacks and man-in-the-middle attacks. In addition, our performance analysis shows that the proposed scheme has less computation overhead. Miqi Wu, Lin You, Gengran Hu, Chengtang Cao |
Secur. Commun. Networks | 5 |
| 2021 | A Novel Machine Learning-Based Analysis Model for Smart Contract VulnerabilityabstractIn recent years, a lot of vulnerabilities of smart contracts have been found. Hackers used these vulnerabilities to attack the corresponding contracts developed in the blockchain system such as Ethereum, and it has caused lots of economic losses. Therefore, it is very important to find out the potential problems of the smart contracts and develop more secure smart contracts. As blockchain security events have raised more important issues, more and more smart contract security analysis methods have been developed. Most of these methods are based on traditional static analysis or dynamic analysis methods. There are only a few methods that use emerging technologies, such as machine learning. Some models that use machine learning to detect smart contract vulnerabilities cost much time in extracting features manually. In this paper, we introduce a novel machine learning-based analysis model by introducing the shared child nodes for smart contract vulnerabilities. We build the Abstract-Syntax-Tree (AST) for smart contracts with some vulnerabilities from two data sets including SmartBugs and SolidiFI-benchmark. Then, we build the Abstract-Syntax-Tree (AST) of the labeled smart contract for data sets named Smartbugs-wilds. Next, we get the shared child nodes from both of the ASTs to obtain the structural similarity, and then, we construct a feature vector composed of the values that measure structural similarity automatically to build our machine learning model. Finally, we get a KNN model that can predict eight types of vulnerabilities including Re-entrancy, Arithmetic, Access Control, Denial of Service, Unchecked Low Level Calls, Bad Randomness, Front Running, and Denial of Service. The accuracy, recall, and precision of our KNN model are all higher than 90%. In addition, compared with some other analysis tools including Oyente and SmartCheck, our model has higher accuracy. In addition, we spent less time for training . Gengran Hu, Lin You, Chengtang Cao |
Secur. Commun. Networks | 4 |