Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Phillip M. Maffettone
dblp:289/6938
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-7173-7972ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 35% Deep learning architectures and training · 35% Robot manipulation · 30% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
autoencoder |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Accelerating Bayesian Optimization for Biological Sequence Design with Denoising Autoencoders · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
batch bayesian optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Accelerating Bayesian Optimization for Biological Sequence Design with Denoising Autoencoders · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Accelerating Bayesian Optimization for Biological Sequence Design with Denoising Autoencoders · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › autoencoder
denoising autoencoder |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Accelerating Bayesian Optimization for Biological Sequence Design with Denoising Autoencoders · ICML 2022 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation › grasping
pick-and-place |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Facile Integration of Robots into Experimental Orchestration at Scientific User Facilities · ICRA 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › synthetic biology
biological sequence design |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Accelerating Bayesian Optimization for Biological Sequence Design with Denoising Autoencoders · ICML 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multi-objective acquisition function · 1.1gaussian process · 1.1bluesky · 0.8ROS2 · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Facile Integration of Robots into Experimental Orchestration at Scientific User FacilitiesabstractIntegration of robots into scientific user facilities, such as the National Synchrotron Light Source II, improves their efficiency and capacity. Many such facilities use the opensource Bluesky project for experimental control and orchestration. However, there remains an open challenge in deploying robotic solutions at these facilities that are reconfigurable, extensible, and compatible with pre-existing software infrastructure. Herein, we introduce a framework that uses the Robotic Operating System 2 (ROS2) and Bluesky to provide extensible robotic applications, while working under the operational constraints of a large-scale user facility. We demonstrated this framework by integrating a robotic arm to pick and place a sample holder at a beamline, recording a 90% repeatability rate. This provides the groundwork for further new robotics applications at large-scale scientific user facilities that depend on Bluesky. Chandima Fernando, Daniel Olds, Stuart I. Campbell, Phillip M. Maffettone |
ICRA | 4 |
| 2022 | Accelerating Bayesian Optimization for Biological Sequence Design with Denoising AutoencodersabstractBayesian optimization (BayesOpt) is a gold standard for query-efficient continuous optimization. However, its adoption for drug design has been hindered by the discrete, high-dimensional nature of the decision variables. We develop a new approach (LaMBO) which jointly trains a denoising autoencoder with a discriminative multi-task Gaussian process head, allowing gradient-based optimization of multi-objective acquisition functions in the latent space of the autoencoder. These acquisition functions allow LaMBO to balance the explore-exploit tradeoff over multiple design rounds, and to balance objective tradeoffs by optimizing sequences at many different points on the Pareto frontier. We evaluate LaMBO on two small-molecule design tasks, and introduce new tasks optimizing in silico and in vitro properties of large-molecule fluorescent proteins. In our experiments LaMBO outperforms genetic optimizers and does not require a large pretraining corpus, demonstrating that BayesOpt is practical and effective for biological sequence design. Samuel Stanton, Wesley J. Maddox, Nate Gruver, Phillip M. Maffettone, Emily Delaney, Peyton Greenside, Andrew Gordon Wilson |
ICML | 4 |