EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Naomichi Shimada
dblp:289/7552
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Empirical software engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Empirical software engineering
open source software |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | GitHub Sponsors: Exploring a New Way to Contribute to Open Source · ICSE 2022 |
Empirical software engineering › open source software
open source sustainability |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | GitHub Sponsors: Exploring a New Way to Contribute to Open Source · ICSE 2022 |
Empirical software engineering
developer studies |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | GitHub Sponsors: Exploring a New Way to Contribute to Open Source · ICSE 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
quantitative analysis · 0.6qualitative analysis · 0.6mixed-methods study · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Does the first response matter for future contributions? A study of first contributions
Noppadol Assavakamhaenghan, Supatsara Wattanakriengkrai, Naomichi Shimada, Raula Gaikovina Kula, Takashi Ishio, Ken-ichi Matsumoto |
Empir. Softw. Eng. | 3 |
| 2022 | GitHub Sponsors: Exploring a New Way to Contribute to Open SourceabstractGitHub Sponsors, launched in 2019, enables donations to individual open source software (OSS) developers. Financial support for OSS maintainers and developers is a major issue in terms of sustaining OSS projects, and the ability to donate to individuals is expected to support the sustainability of developers, projects, and community. In this work, we conducted a mixed-methods study of GitHub Sponsors, including quantitative and qualitative analyses, to understand the characteristics of developers who are likely to receive donations and what developers think about donations to individuals. We found that: (1) sponsored developers are more active than non-sponsored developers, (2) the possibility to receive donations is related to whether there is someone in their community who is donating, and (3) developers are sponsoring as a new way to contribute to OSS. Our findings are the first step towards data-informed guidance for using GitHub Sponsors, opening up avenues for future work on this new way of financially sustaining the OSS community. Naomichi Shimada, Tao Xiao 0001, Hideaki Hata, Christoph Treude, Ken-ichi Matsumoto |
ICSE | 1 |