Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zongyu Yin
dblp:289/8432
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0001-8709-8829ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Generative modeling · 87% Language models and text generation · 13% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Audio and music processing · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Efficient Neural Music Generation · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › diffusion model architecture
dual-path diffusion |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Efficient Neural Music Generation · NeurIPS 2023 |
Audio and music processing
music generation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Efficient Neural Music Generation · NeurIPS 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › model steering
language model steering |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Efficient Neural Music Generation · NeurIPS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
language model · 1.3diffusion model · 1.3VAE-GAN · 1.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Efficient Neural Music GenerationabstractRecent progress in music generation has been remarkably advanced by the state-of-the-art MusicLM, which comprises a hierarchy of three LMs, respectively, for semantic, coarse acoustic, and fine acoustic modelings. Yet, sampling with the MusicLM requires processing through these LMs one by one to obtain the fine-grained acoustic tokens, making it computationally expensive and prohibitive for a real-time generation. Efficient music generation with a quality on par with MusicLM remains a significant challenge.
In this paper, we present **M**e**L**o**D**y (**M** for music; **L** for LM; **D** for diffusion), an LM-guided diffusion model that generates music audios of state-of-the-art quality meanwhile reducing 95.7\% to 99.6\% forward passes in MusicLM, respectively, for sampling 10s to 30s music. MeLoDy inherits the highest-level LM from MusicLM for semantic modeling, and applies a novel dual-path diffusion (DPD) model and an audio VAE-GAN to efficiently decode the conditioning semantic tokens into waveform. DPD is proposed to simultaneously model the coarse and fine acoustics by incorporating the semantic information into segments of latents effectively via cross-attention at each denoising step. Our experimental results suggest the superiority of MeLoDy, not only in its practical advantages on sampling speed and infinitely continuable generation, but also in its state-of-the-art musicality, audio quality, and text correlation.
Our samples are available at https://Efficient-MeLoDy.github.io/. Max W. Y. Lam, Qiao Tian 0001, Tang Li 0001, Zongyu Yin, Yuliang Ji, Mingbo Ma, Xuchen Song, Jitong Chen, Yuping Wang 0005, Yuxuan Wang 0002 |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2023 | Deep learning's shallow gains: a comparative evaluation of algorithms for automatic music generationabstractAbstract Deep learning methods are recognised as state-of-the-art for many applications of machine learning. Recently, deep learning methods have emerged as a solution to the task of automatic music generation (AMG) using symbolic tokens in a target style, but their superiority over non-deep learning methods has not been demonstrated. Here, we conduct a listening study to comparatively evaluate several music generation systems along six musical dimensions: stylistic success, aesthetic pleasure, repetition or self-reference, melody, harmony, and rhythm. A range of models, both deep learning algorithms and other methods, are used to generate 30-s excerpts in the style of Classical string quartets and classical piano improvisations. Fifty participants with relatively high musical knowledge rate unlabelled samples of computer-generated and human-composed excerpts for the six musical dimensions. We use non-parametric Bayesian hypothesis testing to interpret the results, allowing the possibility of finding meaningfulnon-differences between systems’ performance. We find that the strongest deep learning method, a reimplemented version of Music Transformer, has equivalent performance to a non-deep learning method, MAIA Markov, demonstrating that to date, deep learning does not outperform other methods for AMG. We also find there still remains a significant gap between any algorithmic method and human-composed excerpts. Zongyu Yin, Federico Reuben, Susan Stepney, Tom Collins |
Mach. Learn. | 1 |