Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
George Stepaniants
dblp:289/8571
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Learning theory · 53% Representation and self-supervised learning · 36% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 11% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational science and engineering · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 50% Information theory · 50% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory
functional linear regression |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Learning Partial Differential Equations in Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning
PDE learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Learning Partial Differential Equations in Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation analysis
representation similarity |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | GULP: a prediction-based metric between representations · NeurIPS 2022 |
Mathematical optimization
regularization |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Learning Partial Differential Equations in Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Information theory
reproducing kernel hilbert space |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Learning Partial Differential Equations in Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | GULP: a prediction-based metric between representations · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › linear model
linear prediction |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | GULP: a prediction-based metric between representations · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
representer theorem · 2.0operator RKHS · 2.0kernel ridge regression · 2.0regularized linear prediction · 0.6distance measures · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Learning Partial Differential Equations in Reproducing Kernel Hilbert SpacesabstractWe propose a new data-driven approach for learning the fundamental solutions (Green's functions) of various linear partial differential equations (PDEs) given sample pairs of input-output functions. Building off the theory of functional linear regression (FLR), we estimate the best-fit Green's function and bias term of the fundamental solution in a reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) which allows us to regularize their smoothness and impose various structural constraints. We derive a general representer theorem for operator RKHSs to approximate the original infinite-dimensional regression problem by a finite-dimensional one, reducing the search space to a parametric class of Green's functions. In order to study the prediction error of our Green's function estimator, we extend prior results on FLR with scalar outputs to the case with functional outputs. Finally, we demonstrate our method on several linear PDEs including the Poisson, Helmholtz, Schrödinger, Fokker-Planck, and heat equation. We highlight its robustness to noise as well as its ability to generalize to new data with varying degrees of smoothness and mesh discretization without any additional training. George Stepaniants |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2022 | GULP: a prediction-based metric between representationsabstractComparing the representations learned by different neural networks has recently emerged as a key tool to understand various architectures and ultimately optimize them. In this work, we introduce GULP, a family of distance measures between representations that is explicitly motivated by downstream predictive tasks. By construction, GULP provides uniform control over the difference in prediction performance between two representations, with respect to regularized linear prediction tasks. Moreover, it satisfies several desirable structural properties, such as the triangle inequality and invariance under orthogonal transformations, and thus lends itself to data embedding and visualization. We extensively evaluate GULP relative to other methods, and demonstrate that it correctly differentiates between architecture families, converges over the course of training, and captures generalization performance on downstream linear tasks. Enric Boix-Adserà, Hannah Lawrence, George Stepaniants, Philippe Rigollet |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2021 | Fast and Smooth Interpolation on Wasserstein SpaceabstractWe propose a new method for smoothly interpolating probability measures using the geometry of optimal transport. To that end, we reduce this problem to the classical Euclidean setting, allowing us to directly leverage the extensive toolbox of spline interpolation. Unlike previous approaches to measure-valued splines, our interpolated curves (i) have a clear interpretation as governing particle flows, which is natural for applications, and (ii) come with the first approximation guarantees on Wasserstein space. Finally, we demonstrate the broad applicability of our interpolation methodology by fitting surfaces of measures using thin-plate splines. Sinho Chewi, Julien Clancy, Thibaut Le Gouic, Philippe Rigollet, George Stepaniants, Austin J. Stromme |
AISTATS | 5 |