Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

George Stepaniants

dblp:289/8571 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Learning theory · 53% Representation and self-supervised learning · 36% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 11%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational science and engineering · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 50% Information theory · 50%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory
functional linear regression
0.712023
Learning Partial Differential Equations in Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning
PDE learning
0.712023
Learning Partial Differential Equations in Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation analysis
representation similarity
0.612022
GULP: a prediction-based metric between representations · NeurIPS 2022
Mathematical optimization
regularization
0.212023
Learning Partial Differential Equations in Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Information theory
reproducing kernel hilbert space
0.212023
Learning Partial Differential Equations in Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds
0.212022
GULP: a prediction-based metric between representations · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › linear model
linear prediction
0.212022
GULP: a prediction-based metric between representations · NeurIPS 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

representer theorem · 2.0operator RKHS · 2.0kernel ridge regression · 2.0regularized linear prediction · 0.6distance measures · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Learning Partial Differential Equations in Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces
abstract
We propose a new data-driven approach for learning the fundamental solutions (Green's functions) of various linear partial differential equations (PDEs) given sample pairs of input-output functions. Building off the theory of functional linear regression (FLR), we estimate the best-fit Green's function and bias term of the fundamental solution in a reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) which allows us to regularize their smoothness and impose various structural constraints. We derive a general representer theorem for operator RKHSs to approximate the original infinite-dimensional regression problem by a finite-dimensional one, reducing the search space to a parametric class of Green's functions. In order to study the prediction error of our Green's function estimator, we extend prior results on FLR with scalar outputs to the case with functional outputs. Finally, we demonstrate our method on several linear PDEs including the Poisson, Helmholtz, Schrödinger, Fokker-Planck, and heat equation. We highlight its robustness to noise as well as its ability to generalize to new data with varying degrees of smoothness and mesh discretization without any additional training.
George Stepaniants
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2022 GULP: a prediction-based metric between representations
abstract
Comparing the representations learned by different neural networks has recently emerged as a key tool to understand various architectures and ultimately optimize them. In this work, we introduce GULP, a family of distance measures between representations that is explicitly motivated by downstream predictive tasks. By construction, GULP provides uniform control over the difference in prediction performance between two representations, with respect to regularized linear prediction tasks. Moreover, it satisfies several desirable structural properties, such as the triangle inequality and invariance under orthogonal transformations, and thus lends itself to data embedding and visualization. We extensively evaluate GULP relative to other methods, and demonstrate that it correctly differentiates between architecture families, converges over the course of training, and captures generalization performance on downstream linear tasks.
Enric Boix-Adserà, Hannah Lawrence, George Stepaniants, Philippe Rigollet
NeurIPS3
2021 Fast and Smooth Interpolation on Wasserstein Space
abstract
We propose a new method for smoothly interpolating probability measures using the geometry of optimal transport. To that end, we reduce this problem to the classical Euclidean setting, allowing us to directly leverage the extensive toolbox of spline interpolation. Unlike previous approaches to measure-valued splines, our interpolated curves (i) have a clear interpretation as governing particle flows, which is natural for applications, and (ii) come with the first approximation guarantees on Wasserstein space. Finally, we demonstrate the broad applicability of our interpolation methodology by fitting surfaces of measures using thin-plate splines.
Sinho Chewi, Julien Clancy, Thibaut Le Gouic, Philippe Rigollet, George Stepaniants, Austin J. Stromme
AISTATS5