Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sven Kloppenburg

dblp:29/1062 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3Security and privacy · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Program analysis · 54% Software maintenance and evolution · 36% Requirements engineering and software design · 11%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software maintenance and evolution › software dependencies
code dependencies
0.112008
Defining and continuous checking of structural program dependencies · ICSE 2008
Program analysis › static analysis
incremental analysis
0.112006
Integrating and Scheduling an Open Set of Static Analyses · ASE 2006
Program analysis
static analysis
0.112006
Integrating and Scheduling an Open Set of Static Analyses · ASE 2006
Requirements engineering and software design
software architecture
0.012008
Defining and continuous checking of structural program dependencies · ICSE 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

static analysis · 0.1static analysis integration · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Model-Driven Engineering of Machine Executable Code
Michael Eichberg, Martin Monperrus, Sven Kloppenburg, Mira Mezini
ECMFA3
2008 Defining and continuous checking of structural program dependencies
abstract
Dependencies between program elements need to be modeled from different perspectives reflecting architectural, design, and implementation level decisions. To avoid erosion of the intended structure of the code, it is necessary to explicitly codify these different perspectives on the permitted dependencies and to detect violations continuously and incrementally as software evolves.
Michael Eichberg, Sven Kloppenburg, Karl Klose, Mira Mezini
ICSE2
2006 Integrating and Scheduling an Open Set of Static Analyses
abstract
To improve the productivity of the development process, more and more tools for static software analysis are tightly integrated into the incremental build process of an IDE. If multiple interdependent analyses are used simultaneously, the coordination between the analyses becomes a major obstacle to keep the set of analyses open. We propose an approach to integrating and scheduling an open set of static analyses which decouples the individual analyses and coordinates the analysis executions such that the overall time and space consumption is minimized. The approach has been implemented for the Eclipse IDE and has been used to integrate a wide range of analyses such as finding bug patterns, detecting violations of design guidelines, or type system extensions for Java
Michael Eichberg, Mira Mezini, Sven Kloppenburg, Klaus Ostermann, Benjamin Rank
ASE3
2000 Consistent Detection of Global Predicates under a Weak Fault Assumption
abstract
We study the problem of detecting general global predicates in distributed systems where all application processes and at most t
Felix C. Freiling, Sven Kloppenburg
SRDS2