Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sven Kloppenburg
dblp:29/1062
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3Security and privacy · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers |
Program analysis · 54% Software maintenance and evolution · 36% Requirements engineering and software design · 11% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software maintenance and evolution › software dependencies
code dependencies |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Defining and continuous checking of structural program dependencies · ICSE 2008 |
Program analysis › static analysis
incremental analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Integrating and Scheduling an Open Set of Static Analyses · ASE 2006 |
Program analysis
static analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Integrating and Scheduling an Open Set of Static Analyses · ASE 2006 |
Requirements engineering and software design
software architecture |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Defining and continuous checking of structural program dependencies · ICSE 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
static analysis · 0.1static analysis integration · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | Model-Driven Engineering of Machine Executable Code
Michael Eichberg, Martin Monperrus, Sven Kloppenburg, Mira Mezini |
ECMFA | 3 |
| 2008 | Defining and continuous checking of structural program dependenciesabstractDependencies between program elements need to be modeled from different perspectives reflecting architectural, design, and implementation level decisions. To avoid erosion of the intended structure of the code, it is necessary to explicitly codify these different perspectives on the permitted dependencies and to detect violations continuously and incrementally as software evolves. Michael Eichberg, Sven Kloppenburg, Karl Klose, Mira Mezini |
ICSE | 2 |
| 2006 | Integrating and Scheduling an Open Set of Static AnalysesabstractTo improve the productivity of the development process, more and more tools for static software analysis are tightly integrated into the incremental build process of an IDE. If multiple interdependent analyses are used simultaneously, the coordination between the analyses becomes a major obstacle to keep the set of analyses open. We propose an approach to integrating and scheduling an open set of static analyses which decouples the individual analyses and coordinates the analysis executions such that the overall time and space consumption is minimized. The approach has been implemented for the Eclipse IDE and has been used to integrate a wide range of analyses such as finding bug patterns, detecting violations of design guidelines, or type system extensions for Java Michael Eichberg, Mira Mezini, Sven Kloppenburg, Klaus Ostermann, Benjamin Rank |
ASE | 3 |
| 2000 | Consistent Detection of Global Predicates under a Weak Fault AssumptionabstractWe study the problem of detecting general global predicates in distributed systems where all application processes and at most t Felix C. Freiling, Sven Kloppenburg |
SRDS | 2 |