Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Keiichi Kemmotsu

dblp:29/2007 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 100%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
3D vision · 71% Robot navigation and mapping · 29%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments › context recognition
human behavior recognition
0.112006
Recognizing Human Behaviors with Vision Sensors in a Network Robot System · ICRA 2006
Computer vision › 3D vision
pose estimation
0.011995
Uncertainty in object pose determination with three light-stripe range measurements · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1995
Computer vision › 3D vision
object pose estimation
0.011994
Sensor Placement Desigu for Object Pose Determination with Three Light-Stripe Range Finders · ICRA 1994
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › sensor planning
sensor placement
0.011994
Sensor Placement Desigu for Object Pose Determination with Three Light-Stripe Range Finders · ICRA 1994
Computer vision › 3D vision
range sensing
0.011995
Uncertainty in object pose determination with three light-stripe range measurements · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1995
Performance modeling and evaluation
simulation
0.011994
Sensor Placement Desigu for Object Pose Determination with Three Light-Stripe Range Finders · ICRA 1994

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

logical sensors · 0.1data fusion · 0.1monte carlo simulation · 0.0light-stripe range finding · 0.0perturbation analysis · 0.0least-squares fitting · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 Recognizing Human Behaviors with Vision Sensors in a Network Robot System
abstract
A network robot system integrated with various types of robots via ubiquitous networks is a new concept which introduces an interactive robot living together with people. In this paper, we present a tangible network robot system composed of a mobile robot and vision sensors embedded in an environment, and show human behavior recognition methods necessary for providing diverse services desired by the people in good time. Typical human behaviors are described with logical sensors which are defined through data fusion processes spatially and temporally with the physical sensors of the mobile robot and those in the environment. Our system can be utilized to make human-robot communication and interaction friendlier and smarter
Keiichi Kemmotsu, Tetsuya Tomonaka, Shigetoshi Shiotani, Yoshihiro Koketsu, Masato Iehara
ICRA1
1995 Uncertainty in object pose determination with three light-stripe range measurements
abstract
The pose (position and orientation) of a polyhedral object can be determined by using a set of simple light-stripe range sensors. Data from these sensors, however, inherently contains errors which result in pose uncertainty. Therefore, in addition to calculating the pose itself, it is often desirable to estimate how certain the pose determination is. This paper presents a method for estimating the uncertainty in determining the pose of an arbitrarily positioned object with three light-stripe range finders. We analyze the perturbation of a least squares fit of sensed 3D segments to object faces, and obtain a relationship between the sensing error and the object pose error. Experiments demonstrate that the method provides the estimate of accuracy in pose determination.>
Keiichi Kemmotsu, Takeo Kanade
IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom.1
1994 Sensor Placement Desigu for Object Pose Determination with Three Light-Stripe Range Finders
abstract
The pose (position and orientation) of a polyhedral object can be determined with range data obtained from simple light-stripe range finders. However, localization results are sensitive to where those range finders are placed in the workspace, that is, sensor placement. It is advantageous for vision tasks in a factory environment to plan optimal sensing positions off-line all at once rather than online sequentially. This paper presents a method for finding an optimal sensor placement off-line to accurately determine the pose of an object when using three light-stripe range finders. We evaluate a sensor placement on the basis of average performance measures such as an error rate of object recognition, recognition speed and pose uncertainty over the state space of object pose by a Monte Carlo method. An optimal sensor placement which is given a maximal score by a scalar function of the performance measures is selected by another Monte Carlo method. We emphasize that the expected performance of our system under an optimal sensor placement can be characterized completely via simulation.>
Keiichi Kemmotsu, Takeo Kanade
ICRA1