Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sören Petersen

dblp:29/2010 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Rendering · 67% Image and video processing · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Image and video processing › image matching
dense correspondence estimation
0.112012
Improving dense image correspondence estimation with interactive user guidance · ACM Multimedia 2012
Rendering
image-based rendering
0.112012
Improving dense image correspondence estimation with interactive user guidance · ACM Multimedia 2012
Rendering › image-based rendering
view interpolation
0.112012
Improving dense image correspondence estimation with interactive user guidance · ACM Multimedia 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

subpixel precision · 0.1multi-level user guidance · 0.1interactive correspondence display · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Improving dense image correspondence estimation with interactive user guidance
abstract
High quality dense image correspondence estimation between two images is an essential pre-requisite for view interpolation in visual media production. Due to the ill-posed nature of the problem, automated estimation approaches are prone to erroneous correspondences and subsequent quality degradation, e.g. in the presence of ambiguous movements that require human scene understanding to resolve. Where visually convincing results are essential, artifacts resulting from estimation errors must be repaired by hand with image editing tools. In this paper, we propose a new workflow alternative by fixing the correspondences instead of fixing the interpolated images. We combine realtime interactive correspondence display, multi-level user guidance and algorithmic subpixel precision to counteract failure cases of automated estimation algorithms. Our results show that already few interactions improve the visual quality considerably.
Kai Ruhl, Benjamin Hell, Felix Klose, Christian Lipski, Sören Petersen, Marcus A. Magnor
ACM Multimedia5