Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Andrew K. Packard
dblp:29/3460 · also Andy Packard
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › proximal methods
alternating direction method of multipliers |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | A General Analysis of the Convergence of ADMM · ICML 2015 |
Mathematical optimization
convergence analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | A General Analysis of the Convergence of ADMM · ICML 2015 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | A General Analysis of the Convergence of ADMM · ICML 2015 |
Mathematical optimization › convergence analysis
linear convergence |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | A General Analysis of the Convergence of ADMM · ICML 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
lyapunov analysis · 0.2dynamical system stability analysis · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | A General Analysis of the Convergence of ADMMabstractWe provide a new proof of the linear convergence of the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) when one of the objective terms is strongly convex. Our proof is based on a framework for analyzing optimization algorithms introduced in Lessard et al. (2014), reducing algorithm convergence to verifying the stability of a dynamical system. This approach generalizes a number of existing results and obviates any assumptions about specific choices of algorithm parameters. On a numerical example, we demonstrate that minimizing the derived bound on the convergence rate provides a practical approach to selecting algorithm parameters for particular ADMM instances. We complement our upper bound by constructing a nearly-matching lower bound on the worst-case rate of convergence. Robert Nishihara, Laurent Lessard, Benjamin Recht, Andrew K. Packard, Michael I. Jordan |
ICML | 4 |