EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kallista A. Bonawitz
dblp:29/4152
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3Security and privacy · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
4 papers |
Privacy and data protection · 51% Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 49% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Efficient and distributed learning · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
secure aggregation |
0.7 | 2 | 2020 | Secure Single-Server Aggregation with (Poly)Logarithmic Overhead · CCS 2020 Practical Secure Aggregation for Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning · CCS 2017 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
local differential privacy |
0.7 | 2 | 2020 | Context Aware Local Differential Privacy · ICML 2020 Discrete Distribution Estimation under Local Privacy · ICML 2016 |
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
0.6 | 2 | 2020 | Context Aware Local Differential Privacy · ICML 2020 Secure Single-Server Aggregation with (Poly)Logarithmic Overhead · CCS 2020 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › secure multiparty computation
secret-shared shuffle |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Secure Single-Server Aggregation with (Poly)Logarithmic Overhead · CCS 2020 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
secure multiparty computation |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Practical Secure Aggregation for Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning · CCS 2017 |
Privacy and data protection
privacy-preserving data analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Context Aware Local Differential Privacy · ICML 2020 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › distributed differential privacy
shuffle model |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Secure Single-Server Aggregation with (Poly)Logarithmic Overhead · CCS 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Practical Secure Aggregation for Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning · CCS 2017 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning
privacy-preserving federated learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Practical Secure Aggregation for Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning · CCS 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
secret sharing · 1.0secure aggregation · 0.6randomized response · 0.4minimax estimation · 0.4k-regular graph · 0.4information-theoretic lower bounds · 0.4hashed k-ary randomized response · 0.2RAPPOR · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Towards Sparse Federated Analytics: Location Heatmaps under Distributed Differential Privacy with Secure AggregationabstractWe design a scalable algorithm to privately generate location heatmaps over decentralized data from millions of user devices. It aims to ensure differential privacy before data becomes visible to a service provider while maintaining high data accuracy and minimizing resource consumption on users’ devices. To achieve this, we revisit distributed differential privacy based on recent results in secure multiparty computation, and we design a scalable and adaptive distributed differential privacy approach for location analytics. Evaluation on public location datasets shows that this approach successfully generates metropolitan-scale heatmaps from millions of user samples with a worstcase client communication overhead that is significantly smaller than existing state-of-the-art private protocols of similar accuracy. Eugene Bagdasarian, Peter Kairouz, Stefan Mellem, Adrià Gascón, Kallista A. Bonawitz, Deborah Estrin, Marco Gruteser |
Proc. Priv. Enhancing Technol. | 5 |
| 2020 | Secure Single-Server Aggregation with (Poly)Logarithmic OverheadabstractSecure aggregation is a cryptographic primitive that enables a server to learn the sum of the vector inputs of many clients. Bonawitz et al. (CCS 2017) presented a construction that incurs computation and communication for each client linear in the number of parties. While this functionality enables a broad range of privacy preserving computational tasks, scaling concerns limit its scope of use. We present the first constructions for secure aggregation that achieve polylogarithmic communication and computation per client. Our constructions provide security in the semi-honest and the semi-malicious settings where the adversary controls the server and a δ-fraction of the clients, and correctness with up to δ-fraction dropouts among the clients. Our constructions show how to replace the complete communication graph of Bonawitz et al., which entails the linear overheads, with a k-regular graph of logarithmic degree while maintaining the security guarantees. Beyond improving the known asymptotics for secure aggregation, our constructions also achieve very efficient concrete parameters. The semi-honest secure aggregation can handle a billion clients at the per-client cost of the protocol of Bonawitz et al. for a thousand clients. In the semi-malicious setting with 10 4 clients, each client needs to communicate only with 3% of the clients to have a guarantee that its input has been added together with the inputs of at least 5000 other clients, while withstanding up to 5% corrupt clients and 5% dropouts. We also show an application of secure aggregation to the task of secure shuffling which enables the first cryptographically secure instantiation of the shuffle model of differential privacy. James Bell-Clark, Kallista A. Bonawitz, Adrià Gascón, Tancrède Lepoint, Mariana Raykova 0001 |
CCS | 2 |
| 2020 | Context Aware Local Differential PrivacyabstractLocal differential privacy (LDP) is a strong notion of privacy that often leads to a significant drop in utility. The original definition of LDP assumes that all the elements in the data domain are equally sensitive. However, in many real-life applications, some elements are more sensitive than others. We propose a context-aware framework for LDP that allows the privacy level to vary across the data domain, enabling system designers to place privacy constraints where they matter without paying the cost where they do not. For binary data domains, we provide a universally optimal privatization scheme and highlight its connections to Warner’s randomized response and Mangat’s improved response. Motivated by geo-location and web search applications, for k-ary data domains, we consider two special cases of context-aware LDP: block-structured LDP and high-low LDP. We study minimax discrete distribution estimation under both cases and provide communication-efficient, sample-optimal schemes, and information-theoretic lower bounds. We show, using worst-case analyses and experiments on Gowalla’s 3.6 million check-ins to 43,750 locations, that context-aware LDP achieves a far better accuracy under the same number of samples. Jayadev Acharya, Kallista A. Bonawitz, Peter Kairouz, Daniel Ramage, Ziteng Sun |
ICML | 2 |
| 2017 | Practical Secure Aggregation for Privacy-Preserving Machine LearningabstractWe design a novel, communication-efficient, failure-robust protocol for secure aggregation of high-dimensional data. Our protocol allows a server to compute the sum of large, user-held data vectors from mobile devices in a secure manner (i.e. without learning each user's individual contribution), and can be used, for example, in a federated learning setting, to aggregate user-provided model updates for a deep neural network. We prove the security of our protocol in the honest-but-curious and active adversary settings, and show that security is maintained even if an arbitrarily chosen subset of users drop out at any time. We evaluate the efficiency of our protocol and show, by complexity analysis and a concrete implementation, that its runtime and communication overhead remain low even on large data sets and client pools. For 16-bit input values, our protocol offers $1.73 x communication expansion for 210 users and 220-dimensional vectors, and 1.98 x expansion for 214 users and 224-dimensional vectors over sending data in the clear. Kallista A. Bonawitz, Ben Kreuter, Antonio Marcedone, H. Brendan McMahan, Sarvar Patel, Daniel Ramage, Aaron Segal, Karn Seth |
CCS | 1 |
| 2016 | Discrete Distribution Estimation under Local PrivacyabstractThe collection and analysis of user data drives improvements in the app and web ecosystems, but comes with risks to privacy. This paper examines discrete distribution estimation under local privacy, a setting wherein service providers can learn the distribution of a categorical statistic of interest without collecting the underlying data. We present new mechanisms, including hashed k-ary Randomized Response (KRR), that empirically meet or exceed the utility of existing mechanisms at all privacy levels. New theoretical results demonstrate the order-optimality of KRR and the existing RAPPOR mechanism at different privacy regimes. Peter Kairouz, Kallista A. Bonawitz, Daniel Ramage |
ICML | 2 |
| 2008 | Church: a language for generative models
Noah D. Goodman, Vikash Mansinghka 0001, Daniel M. Roy 0001, Kallista A. Bonawitz, Josh Tenenbaum |
UAI | 4 |