EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Matthew Kelly 0004
dblp:29/4385-4
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
0000-0001-6861-500XORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Legged, aerial and field robots · 77% Motion planning and robot control · 23% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › legged robots
legged robot locomotion |
0.5 | 2 | 2016 | Off-line controller design for reliable walking of ranger · ICRA 2016 Non-linear robust control for inverted-pendulum 2D walking · ICRA 2015 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › bipedal robot
bipedal walking control |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Non-linear robust control for inverted-pendulum 2D walking · ICRA 2015 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
trajectory optimization |
0.1 | 2 | 2016 | Off-line controller design for reliable walking of ranger · ICRA 2016 Non-linear robust control for inverted-pendulum 2D walking · ICRA 2015 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › locomotion control
step planning |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Non-linear robust control for inverted-pendulum 2D walking · ICRA 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
model-based optimization · 0.2hierarchical control · 0.2robust optimization · 0.2inverted pendulum model · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Off-line controller design for reliable walking of rangerabstractWe present a method for designing a walking controller for the walking robot Cornell Ranger. Our goal is a controller that can be designed using model-based optimization, and then transferred directly to the robot without the need for after-the-fact hand-tuning. The structure of the controller is hierarchical, with a high-level balance controller that plans step-to-step motions, and a lower-level joint controller that coordinates the individual joint motors to achieve the desired limb motions. The balance controller is designed through optimization, with the explicit goals of a) achieving a desired walking speed while b) minimizing energy use and c) avoiding falls due to disturbances. We demonstrate this walking controller on the Cornell Ranger, and find that the resulting gait is comparable to that of a previous (hand-tuned) controller, with regard to energy use, speed regulation, and fall prevention. Matthew Kelly 0004, Matthew Sheen, Andy Ruina |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2015 | Non-linear robust control for inverted-pendulum 2D walkingabstractWe present an approach to high-level control for bipedal walking exemplified with a 2D point-mass inextensible-legs inverted-pendulum model. Balance control authority here is only from step position and trailing-leg push-off, both of which are bounded to reflect actuator limits. The controller is defined implicitly as the solution of an optimization problem. The optimization robustly avoids falling for given bounded disturbances and errors and, given that, minimizes the number of steps to reach a given target speed. The optimization can be computed in advance and stored for interpolated real-time use online. The general form of the resulting optimized controller suggests a few simple principles for regulating walking speed: 1) The robot should take bigger steps when speeding up and should also take bigger steps when slowing down 2) push-off is useful for regulating small changes in speed, but it is fully saturated or inactive for larger changes in speed. While the numerically optimized model is simple, the approach should be applicable to, and we plan to use it for, control of bipedal robots in 3D with many degrees of freedom. Matthew Kelly 0004, Andy Ruina |
ICRA | 1 |