Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Elja Arjas

dblp:29/4461 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
0000-0001-6317-1761ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 50% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 50%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured prediction › ranking model
mallows model
0.312017
Probabilistic preference learning with the Mallows rank model · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
preference learning
0.312017
Probabilistic preference learning with the Mallows rank model · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › social choice
rank aggregation
0.112017
Probabilistic preference learning with the Mallows rank model · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology › data integration
bayesian data integration
0.012004
Bayesian integrated functional analysis of microarray data · Bioinform. 2004
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
microarray data analysis
0.012004
Bayesian integrated functional analysis of microarray data · Bioinform. 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

mallows model · 0.6bayesian inference · 0.6hierarchical bayesian model · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Probabilistic preference learning with the Mallows rank model
Valeria Vitelli, Øystein Sørensen, Marta Crispino, Arnoldo Frigessi, Elja Arjas
J. Mach. Learn. Res.5
2010 Bayesian integrated modeling of expression data: a case study on RhoG
abstract
BACKGROUND: DNA microarrays provide an efficient method for measuring activity of genes in parallel and even covering all the known transcripts of an organism on a single array. This has to be balanced against that analyzing data emerging from microarrays involves several consecutive steps, and each of them is a potential source of errors. Errors tend to accumulate when moving from the lower level towards the higher level analyses because of the sequential nature. Eliminating such errors does not seem feasible without completely changing the technologies, but one should nevertheless try to meet the goal of being able to realistically assess degree of the uncertainties that are involved when drawing the final conclusions from such analyses. RESULTS: We present a Bayesian hierarchical model for finding differentially expressed genes between two experimental conditions, proposing an integrated statistical approach where correcting signal saturation, systematic array effects, dye effects, and finding differentially expressed genes, are all modeled jointly. The integration allows all these components, and also the associated errors, to be considered simultaneously. The inference is based on full posterior distribution of gene expression indices and on quantities derived from them rather than on point estimates. The model was applied and tested on two different datasets. CONCLUSIONS: The method presents a way of integrating various steps of microarray analysis into a single joint analysis, and thereby enables extracting information on differential expression in a manner, which properly accounts for various sources of potential error in the process.
Rashi Gupta, Dario Greco, Petri Auvinen, Elja Arjas
BMC Bioinform.4
2007 Estimating genealogies from linked marker data: a Bayesian approach
abstract
BACKGROUND: Answers to several fundamental questions in statistical genetics would ideally require knowledge of the ancestral pedigree and of the gene flow therein. A few examples of such questions are haplotype estimation, relatedness and relationship estimation, gene mapping by combining pedigree and linkage disequilibrium information, and estimation of population structure. RESULTS: We present a probabilistic method for genealogy reconstruction. Starting with a group of genotyped individuals from some population isolate, we explore the state space of their possible ancestral histories under our Bayesian model by using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling techniques. The main contribution of our work is the development of sampling algorithms in the resulting vast state space with highly dependent variables. The main drawback is the computational complexity that limits the time horizon within which explicit reconstructions can be carried out in practice. CONCLUSION: The estimates for IBD (identity-by-descent) and haplotype distributions are tested in several settings using simulated data. The results appear to be promising for a further development of the method.
Dario Gasbarra, Matti Pirinen, Mikko J. Sillanpää, Elja Arjas
BMC Bioinform.4
2004 Bayesian integrated functional analysis of microarray data
abstract
MOTIVATION: The statistical analysis of microarray data usually proceeds in a sequential manner, with the output of the previous step always serving as the input of the next one. However, the methods currently used in such analyses do not properly account for the fact that the intermediate results may not always be correct, then leading to cumulating error in the inferences drawn based on such steps. RESULTS: Here we show that, by an application of hierarchical Bayesian methodology, this sequential procedure can be replaced by a single joint analysis, while systematically accounting for the uncertainties in this process. Moreover, we can also integrate relevant functional information available from databases into such an analysis, thereby increasing the reliability of the biological conclusions that are drawn. We illustrate these points by analysing real data and by showing that the genes can be divided into categories of interest, with the defining characteristic depending on the biological question that is considered. We contend that the proposed method has advantages at two levels. First, there are gains in the statistical and biological results from the analysis of this particular dataset. Second, it opens up new possibilities in analysing microarray data in general.
Madhuchhanda Bhattacharjee, Colin C. Pritchard, Peter S. Nelson, Elja Arjas
Bioinform.4
2001 A Bayesian classification model for sea ice roughness from scatterometer data
abstract
For sea ice in the Baltic Sea, surface scattering can be regarded as the dominant scattering mechanism at C-band. In this paper, a new statistical method is introduced for making statistical inferences about the underlying ice surface roughness on the basis of one-dimensional (1D) scatterometer data y. The central parameter in the hierarchical model applied in the context is a mixture parameter p, which indicates the degree of surface roughness in ice surface. Several questions related to the occurrence of different ice classes on a transect can be solved with the aid of the posterior distribution [p|y]. An empirical approximation for the posterior distribution is computed by using Markov Chain Monte Carlo methodology. The efficiency of the suggested approach is investigated by analyzing a C-band HH-polarization helicopter-borne HUTSCAT scatterometer data. The results provided by the statistical model show good agreement with a video-based ice type classification.
Markku Similä, Elja Arjas, Marko Mäkynen, Martti Hallikainen
IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens.2