Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Andreas Buness

dblp:29/503 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0003-1889-8632ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics
phenotype prediction
0.612022
GenRisk: a tool for comprehensive genetic risk modeling · Bioinform. 2022
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics › genomic prediction
polygenic risk score
0.612022
GenRisk: a tool for comprehensive genetic risk modeling · Bioinform. 2022
Bioinformatics and computational biology
cancer genomics
0.112007
Identification of aberrant chromosomal regions from gene expression microarray studies applied to human breast cancer · Bioinform. 2007
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
microarray data analysis
0.112005
arrayMagic: two-colour cDNA microarray quality control, preprocessing · Bioinform. 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis › microarray data preprocessing
microarray quality control
0.112005
arrayMagic: two-colour cDNA microarray quality control, preprocessing · Bioinform. 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

regression · 0.6classification · 0.6unsupervised learning · 0.1normalization · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 GenRisk: a tool for comprehensive genetic risk modeling
abstract
SUMMARY: The genetic architecture of complex traits can be influenced by both many common regulatory variants with small effect sizes and rare deleterious variants in coding regions with larger effect sizes. However, the two kinds of genetic contributions are typically analyzed independently. Here, we present GenRisk, a python package for the computation and the integration of gene scores based on the burden of rare deleterious variants and common-variants-based polygenic risk scores. The derived scores can be analyzed within GenRisk to perform association tests or to derive phenotype prediction models by testing multiple classification and regression approaches. GenRisk is compatible with VCF input file formats. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: GenRisk is an open source publicly available python package that can be downloaded or installed from Github (https://github.com/AldisiRana/GenRisk). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Rana Aldisi, Emadeldin Hassanin, Sugirthan Sivalingam, Andreas Buness, Hannah Klinkhammer, Andreas Mayr 0001, Holger Fröhlich, Peter M. Krawitz, Carlo Maj
Bioinform.4
2009 Classification across gene expression microarray studies
abstract
BACKGROUND: The increasing number of gene expression microarray studies represents an important resource in biomedical research. As a result, gene expression based diagnosis has entered clinical practice for patient stratification in breast cancer. However, the integration and combined analysis of microarray studies remains still a challenge. We assessed the potential benefit of data integration on the classification accuracy and systematically evaluated the generalization performance of selected methods on four breast cancer studies comprising almost 1000 independent samples. To this end, we introduced an evaluation framework which aims to establish good statistical practice and a graphical way to monitor differences. The classification goal was to correctly predict estrogen receptor status (negative/positive) and histological grade (low/high) of each tumor sample in an independent study which was not used for the training. For the classification we chose support vector machines (SVM), predictive analysis of microarrays (PAM), random forest (RF) and k-top scoring pairs (kTSP). Guided by considerations relevant for classification across studies we developed a generalization of kTSP which we evaluated in addition. Our derived version (DV) aims to improve the robustness of the intrinsic invariance of kTSP with respect to technologies and preprocessing. RESULTS: For each individual study the generalization error was benchmarked via complete cross-validation and was found to be similar for all classification methods. The misclassification rates were substantially higher in classification across studies, when each single study was used as an independent test set while all remaining studies were combined for the training of the classifier. However, with increasing number of independent microarray studies used in the training, the overall classification performance improved. DV performed better than the average and showed slightly less variance. In particular, the better predictive results of DV in across platform classification indicate higher robustness of the classifier when trained on single channel data and applied to gene expression ratios. CONCLUSIONS: We present a systematic evaluation of strategies for the integration of independent microarray studies in a classification task. Our findings in across studies classification may guide further research aiming on the construction of more robust and reliable methods for stratification and diagnosis in clinical practice.
Andreas Buness, Markus Ruschhaupt, Ruprecht Kuner, Achim Tresch
BMC Bioinform.1
2007 Identification of aberrant chromosomal regions from gene expression microarray studies applied to human breast cancer
abstract
MOTIVATION: In cancer, chromosomal imbalances like amplifications and deletions, or changes in epigenetic mechanisms like DNA methylation influence the transcriptional activity. These alterations are often not limited to a single gene but affect several genes of the genomic region and may be relevant for the disease status. For example, the ERBB2 amplicon (17q21) in breast cancer is associated with poor patient prognosis. We present a general, unsupervised method for genome-wide gene expression data to systematically detect tumor patients with chromosomal regions of distinct transcriptional activity. The method aims to find expression patterns of adjacent genes with a consistently decreased or increased level of gene expression in tumor samples. Such patterns have been found to be associated with chromosomal aberrations and clinical parameters like tumor grading and thus can be useful for risk stratification or therapy. RESULTS: Our approach was applied to 12 independent human breast cancer microarray studies comprising 1422 tumor samples. We prioritized chromosomal regions and genes predominantly found across all studies. The result highlighted not only regions which are well known to be amplified like 17q21 and 11q13, but also others like 8q24 (distal to MYC) and 17q24-q25 which may harbor novel putative oncogenes. Since our approach can be applied to any microarray study it may become a valuable tool for the exploration of transcriptional changes in diverse disease types. AVAILABILITY: The R source codes which implement the method and an exemplary analysis are available at http://www.dkfz.de/mga2/people/buness/CTP/. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Andreas Buness, Ruprecht Kuner, Markus Ruschhaupt, Annemarie Poustka, Holger Sültmann, Achim Tresch
Bioinform.1
2005 arrayMagic: two-colour cDNA microarray quality control, preprocessing
abstract
UNLABELLED: arrayMagic is a software package for quality control and preprocessing of two-colour cDNA microarray data. The automated analysis pipeline comprises data import, normalization, replica merging, quality diagnostics and data export. The script-based processing combines reproducibility and flexibility at high-throughput and provides quality-assured and preprocessed microarray data to high-level follow-up analysis. AVAILABILITY: The R package arrayMagic is available with BSD license at http://www.bioconductor.org CONTACT: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The package contains documentation in the form of manual pages and a vignette with a guided tour of a typical workflow.
Andreas Buness, Wolfgang Huber, Klaus Steiner, Holger Sültmann, Annemarie Poustka
Bioinform.1