Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Neal Madras

dblp:29/5675 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-2981-3577ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Information theory · 75% Algorithms and data structures · 25%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100%
Computer networks
3 papers
Wireless networking · 38% Internet architecture and protocols · 28% Network performance modeling · 17%

Topics — the 16 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
bayesian network
0.112009
Strong Limit Theorems for the Bayesian Scoring Criterion in Bayesian Networks · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2009
Information theory › probability theory
limit theorems
0.112009
Strong Limit Theorems for the Bayesian Scoring Criterion in Bayesian Networks · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2009
Algorithms and data structures › randomized algorithms › sampling
markov chain monte carlo
0.011996
Factoring Graphs to Bound Mixing Rates · FOCS 1996
Algorithms and data structures › markov chains
mixing time
0.011996
Factoring Graphs to Bound Mixing Rates · FOCS 1996
Network performance modeling › protocol performance analysis
fairness analysis
0.011992
How Fair is Fair Queuing? · J. ACM 1992
Internet architecture and protocols › packet scheduling
fair queueing
0.011992
How Fair is Fair Queuing? · J. ACM 1992
Routing and switching › service disciplines
processor sharing
0.011992
How Fair is Fair Queuing? · J. ACM 1992
Wireless networking › scheduling
queueing discipline
0.011992
How Fair is Fair Queuing? · J. ACM 1992
Wireless networking › multiple access protocols
binary exponential backoff
0.021988
Stability of binary exponential backoff · J. ACM 1988
On the Stability of the Ethernet · STOC 1985
Internet architecture and protocols › local area network
ethernet
0.021988
Stability of binary exponential backoff · J. ACM 1988
On the Stability of the Ethernet · STOC 1985
Wireless networking
medium access control
0.011988
Stability of binary exponential backoff · J. ACM 1988
Wireless networking › broadcast
multiple access broadcast networks
0.011988
Stability of binary exponential backoff · J. ACM 1988
Computational science and engineering
statistical physics
0.011996
Factoring Graphs to Bound Mixing Rates · FOCS 1996
Internet architecture and protocols
local area network
0.011985
On the Stability of the Ethernet · STOC 1985
Physical-layer communications › multiple access
multiple access channel
0.011985
On the Stability of the Ethernet · STOC 1985
Network performance modeling
stability analysis
0.011985
On the Stability of the Ethernet · STOC 1985

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

bayesian scoring · 0.2asymptotic analysis · 0.2temperature factorization · 0.0markov chain decomposition · 0.0simulation · 0.0stochastic modeling · 0.0sample path comparison · 0.0stochastic analysis · 0.0queueing theory · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Bounds on Kemeny's constant of a graph and the Nordhaus-Gaddum problem
abstract
We study Nordhaus–Gaddum problems for Kemeny’s constant K ( G ) of a connected graph G . We prove bounds on min { K ( G ) , K ( G ¯ ) } and the product K ( G ) K ( G ¯ ) for various families of graphs. In particular, we show that if the maximum degree of a graph G on n vertices is n − O ( 1 ) or n − Ω ( n ) , then min { K ( G ) , K ( G ¯ ) } is at most O ( n ) .
Sooyeong Kim, Neal Madras, Ada Chan, Mark Kempton, Stephen J. Kirkland, Adam Knudson
Discret. Appl. Math.2
2009 Strong Limit Theorems for the Bayesian Scoring Criterion in Bayesian Networks
Nikolai Slobodianik, Dmitry Yu. Zaporozhets, Neal Madras
J. Mach. Learn. Res.3
1996 Factoring Graphs to Bound Mixing Rates
abstract
This paper develops a new technique for bounding the mixing rate of a Markov chain by decomposing the state space into factors. The first application is an efficient Monte Carlo Markov chain algorithm for generating random three-colorings of 2-dimensional lattice regions. This provides a rigorous tool for studying some properties of the 3-state Potts model and the ice model from statistical mechanics. As a second application, we develop similar techniques to bound the mixing rate of a Metropolis sampling algorithm by a type of "temperature factorization". Both factorization theorems work by using known mixing properties of related Markov chains to establish the efficiency of a new sampling algorithm.
Neal Madras, Dana Randall
FOCS1
1992 How Fair is Fair Queuing?
abstract
Abstract. Fair Queuing is a novel queuing discipline with important applications to data networks that support variable-size packets and to systems where the cost of preempting jobs from service is high. The disciphne controls a single server shared by N job arrival streams with each stream allotted a separate queue. After every job completion, the server is assigned to serve, without possibihty of interruption, the job at the head of one of the queues (as soon as at least one job appears in the system). Fair Queuing is designed to handle arbitrary job arrival sequences with essentially no a priori knowledge of their attributes. such that each stream receives its ‘Lfam share ” of serwce. In this paper, we consider two variants of the fair queuing discipline, and rigorously establish their fairness wa sample path comparisons with the head-of-line processor sharing disclphne, a mathematical idealization that prowdes a fairness paradigm. An efficient Implementation of one of the fair queuing disciplines is presented, In passing, a new, fast method for simulating processor sharing is derived. Simulation results are presented to further explore the comparison between fair queuing and processor sharing.
Albert G. Greenberg, Neal Madras
J. ACM2
1990 Comparison of a Fair Queueing Discipline to Processor Sharing
Albert G. Greenberg, Neal Madras
Performance2
1988 Stability of binary exponential backoff
abstract
Binary exponential backoff is a randomized protocol for regulating transmissions on a multiple-access broadcast channel. Ethernet, a local-area network, is built upon this protocol. The fundamental theoretical issue is stability: Does the backlog of packets awaiting transmission remain bounded in time, provided the rates of new packet arrivals are small enough? It is assumedn≥ 2 stations share the channel, each having an infinite buffer where packets accumulate while the station attempts to transmit the first from the buffer. Here, it is established that binary exponential backoff is stable if the sum of the arrival rates is sufficiently small. Detailed results are obtained on which rates lead to stability whenn= 2 stations share the channel. In passing, several other results are derived bearing on the efficiency of the conflict resolution process. Simulation results are reported that, in particular, indicate alternative retransmission protocols can significantly improve performance.
Jonathan Goodman, Albert G. Greenberg, Neal Madras, Peter March
J. ACM3
1985 On the Stability of the Ethernet
abstract
We consider the stochastic behavior of binary exponential backoff, a probabilistic algorithm for regulating transmissions on a multiple access channel. Ethernet, a local area network, is built upon this algorithm. The fundamental theoretical issue is stability: does the backlog of packets awaiting transmission remain bounded in time, provided the rates of new packet arrivals are small enough?
Jonathan Goodman, Albert G. Greenberg, Neal Madras, Peter March
STOC3