Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jeffrey Bennett
dblp:29/6486
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Storage systems · 38% High-performance computing · 38% Memory systems · 12% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
High-performance computing
data-intensive computing |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | DASH: a Recipe for a Flash-based Data Intensive Supercomputer · SC 2010 |
Storage systems
flash and SSD |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | DASH: a Recipe for a Flash-based Data Intensive Supercomputer · SC 2010 |
Information retrieval › information filtering
document filtering |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Optimizing term vectors for efficient and robust filtering · SIGIR 2003 |
Information retrieval › query formulation
term selection |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Optimizing term vectors for efficient and robust filtering · SIGIR 2003 |
Memory systems › shared memory
distributed shared memory |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | DASH: a Recipe for a Flash-based Data Intensive Supercomputer · SC 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
performance evaluation · 0.1term-score normalization · 0.0beta-gamma regulation · 0.0SVM · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | DASH: a Recipe for a Flash-based Data Intensive SupercomputerabstractData intensive computing can be defined as computation involving large datasets and complicated I/O patterns. Data intensive computing is challenging because there is a five-orders-of-magnitude latency gap between main memory DRAM and spinning hard disks; the result is that an inordinate amount of time in data intensive computing is spent accessing data on disk. To address this problem we designed and built a prototype data intensive supercomputer named DASH that exploits flash-based Solid State Drive (SSD) technology and also virtually aggregated DRAM to fill the latency gap . DASH uses commodity parts including Intel® X25-E flash drives and distributed shared memory (DSM) software from ScaleMP®. The system is highly competitive with several commercial offerings by several metrics including achieved IOPS (input output operations per second), IOPS per dollar of system acquisition cost, IOPS per watt during operation, and IOPS per gigabyte (GB) of available storage. We present here an overview of the design of DASH, an analysis of its cost efficiency, then a detailed recipe for how we designed and tuned it for high data-performance, lastly show that running data-intensive scientific applications from graph theory, biology, and astronomy, we achieved as much as two orders-of- magnitude speedup compared to the same applications run on traditional architectures. Jiahua He, Arun Jagatheesan, Sandeep K. S. Gupta, Jeffrey Bennett, Allan Snavely |
SC | 4 |
| 2003 | Optimizing term vectors for efficient and robust filteringabstractWe describe an efficient, robust method for selecting and optimizing terms for a classification or filtering task. Terms are extracted from positive examples in training data based on several alternative term-selection algorithms, then combined additively after a simple term-score normalization step to produce a merged and ranked master term vector. The score threshold for the master vector is set via beta-gamma regulation over all the available training data. The process avoids para-meter calibrations and protracted training. It also results in compact profiles for run-time evaluation of test (new) documents. Results on TREC-2002 filtering-task datasets demonstrate substantial improvements over TREC-median results and rival both idealized IR-based results and optimized (and expensive) SVM-based classifiers in general effectiveness. David A. Evans 0001, Jeffrey Bennett, David A. Hull |
SIGIR | 2 |