Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Andreas Ziehe
dblp:29/6702
· DBLP profile ↗
16ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 13 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
9 papers |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 37% Graph learning · 27% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 21% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
4 papers |
Medical and health informatics · 50% Bioinformatics and computational biology · 50% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Algorithms and data structures · 54% Mathematical optimization · 46% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Audio and music processing · 100% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
blind source separation |
0.2 | 4 | 2005 | Analyzing Coupled Brain Sources: Distinguishing True from Spurious Interaction · NIPS 2005 A Fast Algorithm for Joint Diagonalization with Non-orthogonal Transformations and its Application to Blind Source Separation · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2004 Blind Separation of Post-nonlinear Mixtures using Linearizing Transformations and Temporal Decorrelation · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2003 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › molecular representation learning › molecular graph learning
molecular graph representation learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Learning Invariant Representations of Molecules for Atomization Energy Prediction · NIPS 2012 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
molecular property prediction |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Learning Invariant Representations of Molecules for Atomization Energy Prediction · NIPS 2012 |
Medical and health informatics
neuroimaging |
0.1 | 2 | 2008 | Estimating vector fields using sparse basis field expansions · NIPS 2008 Analyzing Coupled Brain Sources: Distinguishing True from Spurious Interaction · NIPS 2005 |
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra › matrix factorization
matrix diagonalization |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Analyzing Coupled Brain Sources: Distinguishing True from Spurious Interaction · NIPS 2005 |
Mathematical optimization › numerical analysis
joint diagonalization |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | A Fast Algorithm for Joint Diagonalization with Non-orthogonal Transformations and its Application to Blind Source Separation · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2004 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › blind source separation
independent component analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Estimating the Reliability of ICA Projections · NIPS 2001 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel methods |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Kernel Feature Spaces and Nonlinear Blind Souce Separation · NIPS 2001 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
resampling |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Estimating the Reliability of ICA Projections · NIPS 2001 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › parameter estimation
variance estimation |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Estimating the Reliability of ICA Projections · NIPS 2001 |
Audio and music processing › source separation
blind source separation |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Kernel Feature Spaces and Nonlinear Blind Souce Separation · NIPS 2001 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
online learning |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | Adaptive On-line Learning in Changing Environments · NIPS 1996 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
invariant representation learning · 0.3graph neural network · 0.3sparse basis field expansion · 0.2second-order cone programming · 0.2diagonalization · 0.2cross-correlation matrix · 0.2blind source separation · 0.2non-orthogonal transformation · 0.1joint diagonalization · 0.1linearizing transformation · 0.0variance estimation · 0.0resampling · 0.0orthonormal basis construction · 0.0kernel methods · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | Approximate rank-detecting factorization of low-rank tensorsabstractWe present an algorithm, AROFAC2, which detects the (CP-)rank of a degree 3 tensor and calculates its factorization into rank-one components. We provide generative conditions for the algorithm to work and demonstrate on both synthetic and real world data that AROFAC2 is a potentially outperforming alternative to the gold standard PARAFAC over which it has the advantages that it can intrinsically detect the true rank, avoids spurious components, and is stable with respect to outliers and non-Gaussian noise. Franz J. Király, Andreas Ziehe |
ICASSP | 2 |
| 2012 | Learning Invariant Representations of Molecules for Atomization Energy PredictionabstractThe accurate prediction of molecular energetics in chemical compound space is a crucial ingredient for rational compound design. The inherently graph-like, non-vectorial nature of molecular data gives rise to a unique and difficult machine learning problem. In this paper, we adopt a learning-from-scratch approach where quantum-mechanical molecular energies are predicted directly from the raw molecular geometry. The study suggests a benefit from setting flexible priors and enforcing invariance stochastically rather than structurally. Our results improve the state-of-the-art by a factor of almost three, bringing statistical methods one step closer to the holy grail of ''chemical accuracy''. Grégoire Montavon, Katja Hansen, Siamac Fazli, Matthias Rupp, Franziska Biegler, Andreas Ziehe, Alexandre Tkatchenko, O. Anatole von Lilienfeld, Klaus-Robert Müller |
NIPS | 6 |
| 2011 | Music algorithm to localize sources with unknown directivity in acoustic imagingabstractThe Multiple Signal Classification (MUSIC) algorithm for acoustic imaging most commonly assumes that all sources have undirectional radiation pattern. We here propose a modification of this algorithm such that the concept is applicable for arbitrary directional characteristics of the sources. This is accomplished by fitting for each frequency the real valued amplitudes of the acoustic model rather than assuming a fixed functional form. The mathematical problem can be solved analytically resulting in an eigenvalue problem of a real valued Hamiltonian matrix. The performance is illustrated in simulations using pure monopolar, dipolar and quadrupolar sources. Forooz Shahbazi Avarvand, Andreas Ziehe, Guido Nolte |
ICASSP | 2 |
| 2008 | Estimating vector fields using sparse basis field expansionsabstractWe introduce a novel framework for estimating vector fields using sparse basis field expansions (S-FLEX). The notion of basis fields, which are an extension of scalar basis functions, arises naturally in our framework from a rotational invariance requirement. We consider a regression setting as well as inverse problems. All variants discussed lead to second-order cone programming formulations. While our framework is generally applicable to any type of vector field, we focus in this paper on applying it to solving the EEG/MEG inverse problem. It is shown that significantly more precise and neurophysiologically more plausible location and shape estimates of cerebral current sources from EEG/MEG measurements become possible with our method when comparing to the state-of-the-art. Stefan Haufe, Vadim V. Nikulin, Andreas Ziehe, Klaus-Robert Müller, Guido Nolte |
NIPS | 3 |
| 2005 | Analyzing Coupled Brain Sources: Distinguishing True from Spurious InteractionabstractWhen trying to understand the brain, it is of fundamental importance to analyse (e.g. from EEG/MEG measurements) what parts of the cortex interact with each other in order to infer more accurate models of brain activity. Common techniques like Blind Source Separation (BSS) can estimate brain sources and single out artifacts by using the underlying assumption of source signal independence. However, physiologically interesting brain sources typically interact, so BSS will--by construction-- fail to characterize them properly. Noting that there are truly interacting sources and signals that only seemingly interact due to effects of volume conduction, this work aims to contribute by distinguishing these effects. For this a new BSS technique is proposed that uses anti-symmetrized cross-correlation matrices and subsequent diagonalization. The resulting decomposition consists of the truly interacting brain sources and suppresses any spurious interaction stemming from volume conduction. Our new concept of interacting source analysis (ISA) is successfully demonstrated on MEG data. Guido Nolte, Andreas Ziehe, Frank C. Meinecke, Klaus-Robert Müller |
NIPS | 2 |
| 2004 | A Fast Algorithm for Joint Diagonalization with Non-orthogonal Transformations and its Application to Blind Source Separation
Andreas Ziehe, Pavel Laskov, Guido Nolte, Klaus-Robert Müller |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2003 | Optimizing Property Codes in Protein Data Reveals Structural Characteristics
Olaf Weiss, Andreas Ziehe, Hanspeter Herzel |
ICANN | 2 |
| 2003 | Blind Separation of Post-nonlinear Mixtures using Linearizing Transformations and Temporal Decorrelation
Andreas Ziehe, Motoaki Kawanabe, Stefan Harmeling, Klaus-Robert Müller |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2003 | Kernel-Based Nonlinear Blind Source SeparationabstractWe propose kTDSEP, a kernel-based algorithm for nonlinear blind source separation (BSS). It combines complementary research fields: kernel feature spaces and BSS using temporal information. This yields an efficient algorithm for nonlinear BSS with invertible nonlinearity. Key assumptions are that the kernel feature space is chosen rich enough to approximate the nonlinearity and that signals of interest contain temporal information. Both assumptions are fulfilled for a wide set of real-world applications. The algorithm works as follows: First, the data are (implicitly) mapped to a high (possibly infinite)—dimensional kernel feature space. In practice, however, the data form a smaller submanifold in feature space—even smaller than the number of training data points—a fact that has already been used by, for example, reduced set techniques for support vector machines. We propose to adapt to this effective dimension as a preprocessing step and to construct an orthonormal basis of this submanifold. The latter dimension-reduction step is essential for making the subsequent application of BSS methods computationally and numerically tractable. In the reduced space, we use a BSS algorithm that is based on second-order temporal decorrelation. Finally, we propose a selection procedure to obtain the original sources from the extracted nonlinear components automatically. Experiments demonstrate the excellent performance and efficiency of our kTDSEP algorithm for several problems of nonlinear BSS and for more than two sources. Stefan Harmeling, Andreas Ziehe, Motoaki Kawanabe, Klaus-Robert Müller |
Neural Comput. | 2 |
| 2002 | On-line learning in changing environments with applications in supervised and unsupervised learning
Noboru Murata, Motoaki Kawanabe, Andreas Ziehe, Klaus-Robert Müller, Shun-ichi Amari |
Neural Networks | 3 |
| 2001 | Kernel Feature Spaces and Nonlinear Blind Souce SeparationabstractIn kernel based learning the data is mapped to a kernel feature space of a dimension that corresponds to the number of training data points. In practice, however, the data forms a smaller submanifold in feature space, a fact that has been used e.g. by reduced set techniques for SVMs. We propose a new mathematical construction that permits to adapt to the in- trinsic dimension and to find an orthonormal basis of this submanifold. In doing so, computations get much simpler and more important our theoretical framework allows to derive elegant kernelized blind source separation (BSS) algorithms for arbitrary invertible nonlinear mixings. Experiments demonstrate the good performance and high computational efficiency of our kTDSEP algorithm for the problem of nonlinear BSS. Stefan Harmeling, Andreas Ziehe, Motoaki Kawanabe, Klaus-Robert Müller |
NIPS | 2 |
| 2001 | Estimating the Reliability of ICA ProjectionsabstractWhen applying unsupervised learning techniques like ICA or tem(cid:173) poral decorrelation, a key question is whether the discovered pro(cid:173) jections are reliable. In other words: can we give error bars or can we assess the quality of our separation? We use resampling meth(cid:173) ods to tackle these questions and show experimentally that our proposed variance estimations are strongly correlated to the sepa(cid:173) ration error. We demonstrate that this reliability estimation can be used to choose the appropriate ICA-model, to enhance signifi(cid:173) cantly the separation performance, and, most important, to mark the components that have a actual physical meaning. Application to 49-channel-data from an magneto encephalography (MEG) ex(cid:173) periment underlines the usefulness of our approach. Frank C. Meinecke, Andreas Ziehe, Motoaki Kawanabe, Klaus-Robert Müller |
NIPS | 2 |
| 2001 | An approach to blind source separation based on temporal structure of speech signals
Noboru Murata, Shiro Ikeda, Andreas Ziehe |
Neurocomputing | 3 |
| 1999 | Unmixing Hyperspectral Data
Lucas C. Parra, Clay Spence, Paul Sajda, Andreas Ziehe, Klaus-Robert Müller |
NIPS | 4 |
| 1998 | Combining time-delayed decorrelation and ICA: towards solving the cocktail party problemabstractWe present methods to separate blindly mixed signals recorded in a room. The learning algorithm is based on the information maximization in a single layer neural network. We focus on the implementation of the learning algorithm and on issues that arise when separating speakers in room recordings. We used an infomax approach in a feedforward neural network implemented in the frequency domain using the polynomial filter matrix algebra technique. A fast convergence speed was achieved by using a time-delayed decorrelation method as a preprocessing step. Under minimum-phase mixing conditions this preprocessing step was sufficient for the separation of signals. These methods successfully separated a recorded voice with music in the background (cocktail party problem). Finally, we discuss problems that arise in real world recordings and their potential solutions. Te-Won Lee, Andreas Ziehe, Reinhold Orglmeister, Terrence J. Sejnowski |
ICASSP | 2 |
| 1996 | Adaptive On-line Learning in Changing Environments
Noboru Murata, Klaus-Robert Müller, Andreas Ziehe, Shun-ichi Amari |
NIPS | 3 |