Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Peter Güntert

dblp:29/689 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-2911-7574ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › structural biology
NMR spectroscopy
1.022023
NMRtist: an online platform for automated biomolecular NMR spectra analysis · Bioinform. 2023
Noise peak filtering in multi-dimensional NMR spectra using convolutional neural networks · Bioinform. 2018
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics › mass spectrometry data analysis
automated peak picking
0.712023
NMRtist: an online platform for automated biomolecular NMR spectra analysis · Bioinform. 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology › structural bioinformatics
chemical shift assignment
0.712023
NMRtist: an online platform for automated biomolecular NMR spectra analysis · Bioinform. 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology
structural bioinformatics
0.712023
NMRtist: an online platform for automated biomolecular NMR spectra analysis · Bioinform. 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology › structural bioinformatics › protein structure determination
NMR resonance assignment
0.312018
Noise peak filtering in multi-dimensional NMR spectra using convolutional neural networks · Bioinform. 2018
Bioinformatics and computational biology › structural bioinformatics
protein structure determination
0.212023
NMRtist: an online platform for automated biomolecular NMR spectra analysis · Bioinform. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large-scale optimization · 0.7deep learning · 0.7cloud computing · 0.7convolutional neural network · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 NMRtist: an online platform for automated biomolecular NMR spectra analysis
abstract
SUMMARY: We present NMRtist, an online platform that combines deep learning, large-scale optimization and cloud computing to automate protein NMR spectra analysis. Our website provides virtual storage for NMR spectra deposition together with a set of applications designed for automated peak picking, chemical shift assignment and protein structure determination. The system can be used by non-experts and allows protein assignments and structures to be determined within hours after the measurements, strictly without any human intervention. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: NMRtist is freely available to non-commercial users at https://nmrtist.org. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Piotr Klukowski, Roland Riek, Peter Güntert
Bioinform.3
2018 Noise peak filtering in multi-dimensional NMR spectra using convolutional neural networks
abstract
Motivation: Multi-dimensional NMR spectra are generally used for NMR signal assignment and structure analysis. There are several programs that can achieve highly automated NMR signal assignments and structure analysis. On the other hand, NMR spectra tend to have a large number of noise peaks even for data acquired with good sample and machine conditions, and it is still difficult to eliminate these noise peaks. Results: We have developed a method to eliminate noise peaks using convolutional neural networks, implemented in the program package Filt_Robot. The filtering accuracy of Filt_Robot was around 90-95% when applied to 2D and 3D NMR spectra, and the numbers of resulting non-noise peaks were close to those in corresponding manually prepared peaks lists. The filtering can strongly enhance automated NMR spectra analysis. Availability and implementation: The full package of the program, documents and example data are available from http://bmrbdep.pdbj.org/en/nmr_tool_box/Filt_Robot.html. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Naohiro Kobayashi, Yoshikazu Hattori, Takashi Nagata, Shoko Shinya, Peter Güntert, Chojiro Kojima, Toshimichi Fujiwara
Bioinform.5
2014 Peak picking NMR spectral data using non-negative matrix factorization
abstract
BACKGROUND: Simple peak-picking algorithms, such as those based on lineshape fitting, perform well when peaks are completely resolved in multidimensional NMR spectra, but often produce wrong intensities and frequencies for overlapping peak clusters. For example, NOESY-type spectra have considerable overlaps leading to significant peak-picking intensity errors, which can result in erroneous structural restraints. Precise frequencies are critical for unambiguous resonance assignments. RESULTS: To alleviate this problem, a more sophisticated peaks decomposition algorithm, based on non-negative matrix factorization (NMF), was developed. We produce peak shapes from Fourier-transformed NMR spectra. Apart from its main goal of deriving components from spectra and producing peak lists automatically, the NMF approach can also be applied if the positions of some peaks are known a priori, e.g. from consistently referenced spectral dimensions of other experiments. CONCLUSIONS: Application of the NMF algorithm to a three-dimensional peak list of the 23 kDa bi-domain section of the RcsD protein (RcsD-ABL-HPt, residues 688-890) as well as to synthetic HSQC data shows that peaks can be picked accurately also in spectral regions with strong overlap.
Suhas Tikole, Victor Jaravine, Vladimir Rogov, Volker Dötsch, Peter Güntert
BMC Bioinform.5
2012 WeNMR: Structural Biology on the Grid
abstract
The WeNMR ( http://www.wenmr.eu ) project is a European Union funded international effort to streamline and automate analysis of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) and Small Angle X-Ray scattering (SAXS) imaging data for atomic and near-atomic resolution molecular structures. Conventional calculation of structure requires the use of various software packages, considerable user expertise and ample computational resources. To facilitate the use of NMR spectroscopy and SAXS in life sciences the WeNMR consortium has established standard computational workflows and services through easy-to-use web interfaces, while still retaining sufficient flexibility to handle more specific requests. Thus far, a number of programs often used in structural biology have been made available through application portals. The implementation of these services, in particular the distribution of calculations to a Grid computing infrastructure, involves a novel mechanism for submission and handling of jobs that is independent of the type of job being run. With over 450 registered users (September 2012), WeNMR is currently the largest Virtual Organization (VO) in life sciences. With its large and worldwide user community, WeNMR has become the first Virtual Research Community officially recognized by the European Grid Infrastructure (EGI).
Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Marc van Dijk, Nuno Loureiro-Ferreira, Gijs van der Schot, Sjoerd Jacob de Vries, Christophe Schmitz, Johan van der Zwan, Rolf Boelens, Andrea Giachetti 0002, Lucio Ferella, Antonio Rosato, Ivano Bertini, Torsten Herrmann, Hendrik R. A. Jonker, Anurag Bagaria, Victor Jaravine, Peter Güntert, Harald Schwalbe, Wim F. Vranken, Jurgen F. Doreleijers, Gert Vriend, Geerten W. Vuister, Daniel Franke, Alexey Kikhney, Dmitri I. Svergun, Rasmus H. Fogh, John M. C. Ionides, Ernest D. Laue, Chris A. E. M. Spronk, Simonas Jurksa, Marco Verlato, Simone Badoer, Stefano Dal Pra, Mirco Mazzucato, Eric Frizziero, Alexandre M. J. J. Bonvin
J. Grid Comput.17
2011 Objective identification of residue ranges for the superposition of protein structures
abstract
BACKGROUND: The automation of objectively selecting amino acid residue ranges for structure superpositions is important for meaningful and consistent protein structure analyses. So far there is no widely-used standard for choosing these residue ranges for experimentally determined protein structures, where the manual selection of residue ranges or the use of suboptimal criteria remain commonplace. RESULTS: We present an automated and objective method for finding amino acid residue ranges for the superposition and analysis of protein structures, in particular for structure bundles resulting from NMR structure calculations. The method is implemented in an algorithm, CYRANGE, that yields, without protein-specific parameter adjustment, appropriate residue ranges in most commonly occurring situations, including low-precision structure bundles, multi-domain proteins, symmetric multimers, and protein complexes. Residue ranges are chosen to comprise as many residues of a protein domain that increasing their number would lead to a steep rise in the RMSD value. Residue ranges are determined by first clustering residues into domains based on the distance variance matrix, and then refining for each domain the initial choice of residues by excluding residues one by one until the relative decrease of the RMSD value becomes insignificant. A penalty for the opening of gaps favours contiguous residue ranges in order to obtain a result that is as simple as possible, but not simpler. Results are given for a set of 37 proteins and compared with those of commonly used protein structure validation packages. We also provide residue ranges for 6351 NMR structures in the Protein Data Bank. CONCLUSIONS: The CYRANGE method is capable of automatically determining residue ranges for the superposition of protein structure bundles for a large variety of protein structures. The method correctly identifies ordered regions. Global structure superpositions based on the CYRANGE residue ranges allow a clear presentation of the structure, and unnecessary small gaps within the selected ranges are absent. In the majority of cases, the residue ranges from CYRANGE contain fewer gaps and cover considerably larger parts of the sequence than those from other methods without significantly increasing the RMSD values. CYRANGE thus provides an objective and automatic method for standardizing the choice of residue ranges for the superposition of protein structures.
Donata K. Kirchner, Peter Güntert
BMC Bioinform.2
2002 On the Migration of the Scientific Code Dyana from SMPs to Clusters of PCs and on to the Grid
abstract
Dyana is a molecular biology code used in the study of infectious prion proteins. Like many other scientific codes, Dyana was migrated successfully from vector supercomputers to some more cost-effective cluster of commodity PCs. A further migration to a widely distributed grid computing platform looks very tempting because many of these platforms promise the use of nearly free compute-cycles on the Internet. Not all codes are equally suited for all platforms. Even embarrassingly parallel codes might require a significant re-engineering effort for a migration from one platform to another. A better understanding of the performance characteristics of a code is required before a migration is attempted. To address this problem, we present a systematic method to study the viability of a code migration from one platform to another, before it is actually undertaken. We construct an analytic performance model of the application. We use the previous migration from SMPs to commodity clusters of PCs to validate and calibrate the model. Finally, we extrapolate the performance of Dyana widely distributed computing on the grid and we suggest optimizations in the process of migration. Our general model predicts that Dyana can efficiently use up to 42000 processors with its current workload and is therefore well suited for grid computing on the Internet.
Michela Taufer, Thomas Stricker, Gerard Roos, Peter Güntert
CCGRID4