Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Keisuke Fujii 0002
dblp:29/7383-2
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Quantum computing and quantum information · 67% Computational complexity · 33% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 87% Efficient and distributed learning · 13% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | GPflow: A Gaussian Process Library using TensorFlow · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | GPflow: A Gaussian Process Library using TensorFlow · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 |
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum algorithms › quantum sampling
fourier sampling |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Power of Quantum Computation with Few Clean Qubits · ICALP 2016 |
Computational complexity › complexity classes
polynomial hierarchy |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Power of Quantum Computation with Few Clean Qubits · ICALP 2016 |
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum algorithms
quantum sampling |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Power of Quantum Computation with Few Clean Qubits · ICALP 2016 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › hardware acceleration
GPU acceleration |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | GPflow: A Gaussian Process Library using TensorFlow · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variational inference · 0.3automatic differentiation · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | GPflow: A Gaussian Process Library using TensorFlowabstractGPflow is a Gaussian process library that uses TensorFlow for its core computations and Python for its front end. The distinguishing features of GPflow are that it uses variational inference as the primary approximation method, provides concise code through the use of automatic differentiation, has been engineered with a particular emphasis on software testing and is able to exploit GPU hardware. Alexander G. de G. Matthews, Mark van der Wilk, Tom Nickson, Keisuke Fujii 0002, Alexis Boukouvalas, Pablo León-Villagrá, Zoubin Ghahramani, James Hensman |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 4 |
| 2016 | Power of Quantum Computation with Few Clean QubitsabstractA line of work initiated by Terhal and DiVincenzo and Bremner, Jozsa, and Shepherd, shows that quantum computers can efficiently sample from probability distributions that cannot be exactly sampled efficiently on a classical computer, unless the PH collapses. Aaronson and Arkhipov take this further by considering a distribution that can be sampled efficiently by linear optical quantum computation, that under two feasible conjectures, cannot even be approximately sampled classically within bounded total variation distance, unless the PH collapses. In this work we use Quantum Fourier Sampling to construct a class of distributions that can be sampled by a quantum computer. We then argue that these distributions cannot be approximately sampled classically, unless the PH collapses, under variants of the Aaronson and Arkhipov conjectures. In particular, we show a general class of quantumly sampleable distributions each of which is based on an "Efficiently Specifiable" polynomial, for which a classical approximate sampler implies an average-case approximation. This class of polynomials contains the Permanent but also includes, for example, the Hamiltonian Cycle polynomial, and many other familiar #P-hard polynomials. Although our construction, unlike that proposed by Aaronson and Arkhipov, likely requires a universal quantum computer, we are able to use this additional power to weaken the conjectures needed to prove approximate sampling hardness results. Keisuke Fujii 0002, Hirotada Kobayashi, Tomoyuki Morimae, Harumichi Nishimura, Shuhei Tamate, Seiichiro Tani |
ICALP | 1 |