Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Etan Fisher

dblp:29/7823 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
0009-0000-2450-1940ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Audio and music processing · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Audio and music processing
microphone array processing
0.112011
Near-Field Spherical Microphone Array Processing With Radial Filtering · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2011
Audio and music processing › microphone array processing
spherical microphone array
0.112011
Near-Field Spherical Microphone Array Processing With Radial Filtering · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2011
Audio and music processing › speech analysis
pitch tracking
0.112006
Generalized likelihood ratio test for voiced-unvoiced decision in noisy speech using the harmonic model · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2006
Audio and music processing
speech analysis
0.112006
Generalized likelihood ratio test for voiced-unvoiced decision in noisy speech using the harmonic model · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2006
Audio and music processing › sound synthesis
harmonic plus noise model
0.012006
Generalized likelihood ratio test for voiced-unvoiced decision in noisy speech using the harmonic model · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

radial notch filtering · 0.1dolph-chebyshev filter design · 0.1maximum a posteriori probability · 0.1generalized likelihood ratio test · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 Near-Field Spherical Microphone Array Processing With Radial Filtering
abstract
This paper presents an analysis of spherical microphone array capabilities in the near-field, with an emphasis on radial filtering of sources in a given direction. The near-field of the array is defined in terms of frequency and distance from the array. Directional beamforming is demonstrated given the near-field radial compensation filter, which yields a desired directional beampattern at a chosen distance from the array. This pattern deteriorates as the source draws away from the array. Next, a framework is presented for radial filter design, enabling distance discrimination between sources positioned in the same direction relative to the array. Design examples include Dolph-Chebyshev radial filtering, radial notch filtering, and numerical design. Performance is analyzed in terms of spatial response and robustness to noise. Results show radial filtering is practical for improving attenuation of far-field and near-field interfering sources relative to a desired source positioned in the same direction.
Etan Fisher, Boaz Rafaely
IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process.1
2008 The nearfield spherical microphone array
abstract
A nearfield spherical microphone array is presented. The nearfield criterion of the spherical array is defined in terms of array order, frequency and location. It is shown that given a source in the nearfield, significant attenuation of farfield interference is achieved. Also, nearfield sources may be attenuated relative to farfield sources. Dereverberation of a nearfield source in a reverberant enclosure is demonstrated using the nearfield microphone array.
Etan Fisher, Boaz Rafaely
ICASSP1
2006 Generalized likelihood ratio test for voiced-unvoiced decision in noisy speech using the harmonic model
abstract
In this paper, a novel method for voiced-unvoiced decision within a pitch tracking algorithm is presented. Voiced-unvoiced decision is required for many applications, including modeling for analysis/synthesis, detection of model changes for segmentation purposes and signal characterization for indexing and recognition applications. The proposed method is based on the generalized likelihood ratio test (GLRT) and assumes colored Gaussian noise with unknown covariance. Under voiced hypothesis, a harmonic plus noise model is assumed. The derived method is combined with a maximum a-posteriori probability (MAP) scheme to obtain a pitch and voicing tracking algorithm. The performance of the proposed method is tested using several speech databases for different levels of additive noise and phone speech conditions. Results show that the GLRT is robust to speaker and environmental conditions and performs better than existing algorithms.
Etan Fisher, Joseph Tabrikian, Shlomo Dubnov
IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process.1
2003 Generalized likelihood ratio test for voiced/unvoiced decision using the harmonic plus noise model
abstract
In this paper, a novel method for voiced/invoiced decision in speech and music signals is presented. Voiced/unvoiced decision is required for many applications, including better modeling for analysis/synthesis, detection of model changes for segmentation purposes and better signal characterization for indexing and recognition applications. The proposed method is based on the generalized likelihood ratio test (GLRT) and assumes colored Gaussian noise with unknown covariance. Under voiced hypothesis, a harmonic plus noise model is assumed. The derived method is combined with a maximum a-posteriori probability (MAP) scheme to obtain a voiced unvoiced tracking algorithm. The performance of the proposed method is tested under the Keele University database for different signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs), and the results show that the algorithm performs well even under severe noise conditions.
Etan Fisher, Joseph Tabrikian, Shlomo Dubnov
ICASSP (1)1