Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Na You

dblp:29/8023 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
0000-0001-8014-7229ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
4 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Parallel and multicore computing · 100%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics
0.422016
MultiGeMS: detection of SNVs from multiple samples using model selection on high-throughput sequencing data · Bioinform. 2016
SNP calling using genotype model selection on high-throughput sequencing data · Bioinform. 2012
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
variant calling
0.422016
MultiGeMS: detection of SNVs from multiple samples using model selection on high-throughput sequencing data · Bioinform. 2016
SNP calling using genotype model selection on high-throughput sequencing data · Bioinform. 2012
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
high-throughput sequencing data analysis
0.212016
MultiGeMS: detection of SNVs from multiple samples using model selection on high-throughput sequencing data · Bioinform. 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology › population genetics
population genomics
0.212016
An empirical Bayes method for genotyping and SNP detection using multi-sample next-generation sequencing data · Bioinform. 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence variation analysis
single nucleotide variant detection
0.212016
MultiGeMS: detection of SNVs from multiple samples using model selection on high-throughput sequencing data · Bioinform. 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics
genotype calling
0.112012
SNP calling using genotype model selection on high-throughput sequencing data · Bioinform. 2012
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › computational genomics
SNP detection
0.112012
SNP calling using genotype model selection on high-throughput sequencing data · Bioinform. 2012
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics › genetic mapping
genetic map construction
0.112010
Single feature polymorphism detection using recombinant inbred line microarray expression data · Bioinform. 2010
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › variant analysis
polymorphism detection
0.112010
Single feature polymorphism detection using recombinant inbred line microarray expression data · Bioinform. 2010
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics
quantitative trait locus mapping
0.112010
Single feature polymorphism detection using recombinant inbred line microarray expression data · Bioinform. 2010
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
genome sequencing
0.112016
An empirical Bayes method for genotyping and SNP detection using multi-sample next-generation sequencing data · Bioinform. 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology
next-generation sequencing
0.112016
An empirical Bayes method for genotyping and SNP detection using multi-sample next-generation sequencing data · Bioinform. 2016
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel computing › parallel bioinformatics
parallel sequence analysis
0.112016
MultiGeMS: detection of SNVs from multiple samples using model selection on high-throughput sequencing data · Bioinform. 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical error modeling · 0.5model selection · 0.5high-performance computing · 0.5empirical bayes · 0.2ECM algorithm · 0.2maximum likelihood · 0.1genotype model selection · 0.1robust multi-array analysis · 0.1dip statistic · 0.1bootstrap hypothesis testing · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 An empirical Bayes method for genotyping and SNP detection using multi-sample next-generation sequencing data
abstract
MOTIVATION: The development of next generation sequencing technology provides an efficient and powerful approach to rare variant detection. To identify genetic variations, the essential question is how to quantity the sequencing error rate in the data. Because of the advantage of easy implementation and the ability to integrate data from different sources, the empirical Bayes method is popularly employed to estimate the sequencing error rate for SNP detection. RESULTS: We propose a novel statistical model to fit the observed non-reference allele frequency data, and utilize the empirical Bayes method for both genotyping and SNP detection, where an ECM algorithm is implemented to estimate the model parameters. The performance of our proposed method is investigated via simulations and real data analysis. It is shown that our method makes less genotype-call errors, and with the parameter estimates from the ECM algorithm, it attains high detection power with FDR being well controlled. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The proposed algorithm is wrapped in the R package ebGenotyping, which can be downloaded from http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ebGenotyping/ CONTACT: [email protected] information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Gongyi Huang, Shaoli Wang, Na You
Bioinform.4
2016 MultiGeMS: detection of SNVs from multiple samples using model selection on high-throughput sequencing data
abstract
MOTIVATION: Single nucleotide variant (SNV) detection procedures are being utilized as never before to analyze the recent abundance of high-throughput DNA sequencing data, both on single and multiple sample datasets. Building on previously published work with the single sample SNV caller genotype model selection (GeMS), a multiple sample version of GeMS (MultiGeMS) is introduced. Unlike other popular multiple sample SNV callers, the MultiGeMS statistical model accounts for enzymatic substitution sequencing errors. It also addresses the multiple testing problem endemic to multiple sample SNV calling and utilizes high performance computing (HPC) techniques. RESULTS: A simulation study demonstrates that MultiGeMS ranks highest in precision among a selection of popular multiple sample SNV callers, while showing exceptional recall in calling common SNVs. Further, both simulation studies and real data analyses indicate that MultiGeMS is robust to low-quality data. We also demonstrate that accounting for enzymatic substitution sequencing errors not only improves SNV call precision at low mapping quality regions, but also improves recall at reference allele-dominated sites with high mapping quality. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The MultiGeMS package can be downloaded from https://github.com/cui-lab/multigems CONTACT: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Gabriel H. Murillo, Na You, Xiaoquan Su, Muredach P. Reilly, Mingyao Li, Kang Ning 0001, Xinping Cui
Bioinform.2
2012 SNP calling using genotype model selection on high-throughput sequencing data
abstract
MOTIVATION: A review of the available single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) calling procedures for Illumina high-throughput sequencing (HTS) platform data reveals that most rely mainly on base-calling and mapping qualities as sources of error when calling SNPs. Thus, errors not involved in base-calling or alignment, such as those in genomic sample preparation, are not accounted for. RESULTS: A novel method of consensus and SNP calling, Genotype Model Selection (GeMS), is given which accounts for the errors that occur during the preparation of the genomic sample. Simulations and real data analyses indicate that GeMS has the best performance balance of sensitivity and positive predictive value among the tested SNP callers. AVAILABILITY: The GeMS package can be downloaded from https://sites.google.com/a/bioinformatics.ucr.edu/xinping-cui/home/software or http://computationalbioenergy.org/software.html. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Na You, Gabriel H. Murillo, Xiaoquan Su, Xiaowei Zeng, Jian Xu 0020, Kang Ning 0001, Shoudong Zhang, Jiankang Zhu, Xinping Cui
Bioinform.1
2010 Single feature polymorphism detection using recombinant inbred line microarray expression data
abstract
MOTIVATION: The Affymetrix GeneChip microarray is currently providing a high-density and economical platform for discovery of genetic polymorphisms. Microarray data for single feature polymorphism (SFP) detection in recombinant inbred lines (RILs) can capitalize on the high level of replication available for each locus in the RIL population. It was suggested that the binding affinities from all of the RILs would form a multimodal distribution for a SFP. This motivated us to estimate the binding affinities from the robust multi-array analysis (RMA) method and formulate the SFP detection problem as a hypothesis testing problem, i.e. testing whether the underlying distribution of the estimated binding affinity (EBA) values of a probe is unimodal or multimodal. RESULTS: We developed a bootstrap-based hypothesis testing procedure using the 'dip' statistic. Our simulation studies show that the proposed procedure can reach satisfactory detection power with false discovery rate controlled at a desired level and is robust to the unimodal distribution assumption, which facilitates wide application of the proposed procedure. Our analysis of the real data identified more than four times the SFPs compared to the previous studies, covering 96% of their findings. The constructed genetic map using the SFP markers predicted from our procedure shows over 99% concordance of the genetic orders of these markers with their known physical locations on the genome sequence. AVAILABILITY: The R package 'dipSFP' can be downloaded from http://sites.google.com/a/bioinformatics.ucr.edu/xinping-cui/home/software.
Xinping Cui, Na You, Thomas Girke, Richard Michelmore, Allen Van Deynze
Bioinform.2