Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Markus Ekvall
dblp:290/0028
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
GPUs and heterogeneous computing · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biostatistics
statistical bioinformatics |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Parallelized calculation of permutation tests · Bioinform. 2021 |
GPUs and heterogeneous computing
GPU computing |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Parallelized calculation of permutation tests · Bioinform. 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
dynamic programming · 1.0GPU parallelization · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Parallelized calculation of permutation testsabstractMOTIVATION: Permutation tests offer a straightforward framework to assess the significance of differences in sample statistics. A significant advantage of permutation tests are the relatively few assumptions about the distribution of the test statistic are needed, as they rely on the assumption of exchangeability of the group labels. They have great value, as they allow a sensitivity analysis to determine the extent to which the assumed broad sample distribution of the test statistic applies. However, in this situation, permutation tests are rarely applied because the running time of naïve implementations is too slow and grows exponentially with the sample size. Nevertheless, continued development in the 1980s introduced dynamic programming algorithms that compute exact permutation tests in polynomial time. Albeit this significant running time reduction, the exact test has not yet become one of the predominant statistical tests for medium sample size. Here, we propose a computational parallelization of one such dynamic programming-based permutation test, the Green algorithm, which makes the permutation test more attractive. RESULTS: Parallelization of the Green algorithm was found possible by non-trivial rearrangement of the structure of the algorithm. A speed-up-by orders of magnitude-is achievable by executing the parallelized algorithm on a GPU. We demonstrate that the execution time essentially becomes a non-issue for sample sizes, even as high as hundreds of samples. This improvement makes our method an attractive alternative to, e.g. the widely used asymptotic Mann-Whitney U-test. AVAILABILITYAND IMPLEMENTATION: In Python 3 code from the GitHub repository https://github.com/statisticalbiotechnology/parallelPermutationTest under an Apache 2.0 license. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Markus Ekvall, Michael Höhle, Lukas Käll |
Bioinform. | 1 |