Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Markus Ekvall

dblp:290/0028 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
GPUs and heterogeneous computing · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biostatistics
statistical bioinformatics
0.512021
Parallelized calculation of permutation tests · Bioinform. 2021
GPUs and heterogeneous computing
GPU computing
0.512021
Parallelized calculation of permutation tests · Bioinform. 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

dynamic programming · 1.0GPU parallelization · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Parallelized calculation of permutation tests
abstract
MOTIVATION: Permutation tests offer a straightforward framework to assess the significance of differences in sample statistics. A significant advantage of permutation tests are the relatively few assumptions about the distribution of the test statistic are needed, as they rely on the assumption of exchangeability of the group labels. They have great value, as they allow a sensitivity analysis to determine the extent to which the assumed broad sample distribution of the test statistic applies. However, in this situation, permutation tests are rarely applied because the running time of naïve implementations is too slow and grows exponentially with the sample size. Nevertheless, continued development in the 1980s introduced dynamic programming algorithms that compute exact permutation tests in polynomial time. Albeit this significant running time reduction, the exact test has not yet become one of the predominant statistical tests for medium sample size. Here, we propose a computational parallelization of one such dynamic programming-based permutation test, the Green algorithm, which makes the permutation test more attractive. RESULTS: Parallelization of the Green algorithm was found possible by non-trivial rearrangement of the structure of the algorithm. A speed-up-by orders of magnitude-is achievable by executing the parallelized algorithm on a GPU. We demonstrate that the execution time essentially becomes a non-issue for sample sizes, even as high as hundreds of samples. This improvement makes our method an attractive alternative to, e.g. the widely used asymptotic Mann-Whitney U-test. AVAILABILITYAND IMPLEMENTATION: In Python 3 code from the GitHub repository https://github.com/statisticalbiotechnology/parallelPermutationTest under an Apache 2.0 license. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Markus Ekvall, Michael Höhle, Lukas Käll
Bioinform.1