Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hwanil Choi

dblp:290/1183 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Generative modeling · 62% Vision and language · 18% Learning theory · 16%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visual content generation and editing · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative adversarial network
1.122022
Can We Find Neurons that Cause Unrealistic Images in Deep Generative Networks? · IJCAI 2022
Automatic Correction of Internal Units in Generative Neural Networks · CVPR 2021
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
0.712023
Rarity Score : A New Metric to Evaluate the Uncommonness of Synthesized Images · ICLR 2023
Computer vision › Vision and language › multimodal evaluation
text-to-image generation evaluation
0.712023
Rarity Score : A New Metric to Evaluate the Uncommonness of Synthesized Images · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory
neural network analysis
0.612022
Can We Find Neurons that Cause Unrealistic Images in Deep Generative Networks? · IJCAI 2022
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › image restoration
artifact correction
0.512021
Automatic Correction of Internal Units in Generative Neural Networks · CVPR 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.112021
Automatic Correction of Internal Units in Generative Neural Networks · CVPR 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

rarity score · 1.3sequential ablation · 0.6neuron statistics analysis · 0.6generative adversarial network · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Rarity Score : A New Metric to Evaluate the Uncommonness of Synthesized Images
Jiyeon Han 0001, Hwanil Choi, Yunjey Choi, Jung-Woo Ha 0001, Jaesik Choi
ICLR2
2022 Can We Find Neurons that Cause Unrealistic Images in Deep Generative Networks?
abstract
Even though Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) have shown a remarkable ability to generate high-quality images, GANs do not always guarantee the generation of photorealistic images. Occasionally, they generate images that have defective or unnatural objects, which are referred to as `artifacts'. Research to investigate why these artifacts emerge and how they can be detected and removed has yet to be sufficiently carried out. To analyze this, we first hypothesize that rarely activated neurons and frequently activated neurons have different purposes and responsibilities for the progress of generating images. In this study, by analyzing the statistics and the roles for those neurons, we empirically show that rarely activated neurons are related to the failure results of making diverse objects and inducing artifacts. In addition, we suggest a correction method, called `Sequential Ablation’, to repair the defective part of the generated images without high computational cost and manual efforts.
Hwanil Choi, Wonjoon Chang, Jaesik Choi
IJCAI1
2021 Automatic Correction of Internal Units in Generative Neural Networks
abstract
Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) have shown satisfactory performance in synthetic image generation by devising complex network structure and adversarial training scheme. Even though GANs are able to synthesize realistic images, there exists a number of generated images with defective visual patterns which are known as artifacts. While most of the recent work tries to fix artifact generations by perturbing latent code, few investigate internal units of a generator to fix them. In this work, we devise a method that automatically identifies the internal units generating various types of artifact images. We further propose the sequential correction algorithm which adjusts the generation flow by modifying the detected artifact units to improve the quality of generation while preserving the original outline. Our method outperforms the baseline method in terms of FID-score and shows satisfactory results with human evaluation.
Ali Tousi, Haedong Jeong, Jiyeon Han 0001, Hwanil Choi, Jaesik Choi
CVPR4