Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hwanil Choi
dblp:290/1183
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Generative modeling · 62% Vision and language · 18% Learning theory · 16% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Visual content generation and editing · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative adversarial network |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Can We Find Neurons that Cause Unrealistic Images in Deep Generative Networks? · IJCAI 2022 Automatic Correction of Internal Units in Generative Neural Networks · CVPR 2021 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Rarity Score : A New Metric to Evaluate the Uncommonness of Synthesized Images · ICLR 2023 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › multimodal evaluation
text-to-image generation evaluation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Rarity Score : A New Metric to Evaluate the Uncommonness of Synthesized Images · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory
neural network analysis |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Can We Find Neurons that Cause Unrealistic Images in Deep Generative Networks? · IJCAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › image restoration
artifact correction |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Automatic Correction of Internal Units in Generative Neural Networks · CVPR 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Automatic Correction of Internal Units in Generative Neural Networks · CVPR 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
rarity score · 1.3sequential ablation · 0.6neuron statistics analysis · 0.6generative adversarial network · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Rarity Score : A New Metric to Evaluate the Uncommonness of Synthesized Images
Jiyeon Han 0001, Hwanil Choi, Yunjey Choi, Jung-Woo Ha 0001, Jaesik Choi |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2022 | Can We Find Neurons that Cause Unrealistic Images in Deep Generative Networks?abstractEven though Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) have shown a remarkable ability to generate high-quality images, GANs do not always guarantee the generation of photorealistic images. Occasionally, they generate images that have defective or unnatural objects, which are referred to as `artifacts'. Research to investigate why these artifacts emerge and how they can be detected and removed has yet to be sufficiently carried out. To analyze this, we first hypothesize that rarely activated neurons and frequently activated neurons have different purposes and responsibilities for the progress of generating images. In this study, by analyzing the statistics and the roles for those neurons, we empirically show that rarely activated neurons are related to the failure results of making diverse objects and inducing artifacts. In addition, we suggest a correction method, called `Sequential Ablation’, to repair the defective part of the generated images without high computational cost and manual efforts. Hwanil Choi, Wonjoon Chang, Jaesik Choi |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2021 | Automatic Correction of Internal Units in Generative Neural NetworksabstractGenerative Adversarial Networks (GANs) have shown satisfactory performance in synthetic image generation by devising complex network structure and adversarial training scheme. Even though GANs are able to synthesize realistic images, there exists a number of generated images with defective visual patterns which are known as artifacts. While most of the recent work tries to fix artifact generations by perturbing latent code, few investigate internal units of a generator to fix them. In this work, we devise a method that automatically identifies the internal units generating various types of artifact images. We further propose the sequential correction algorithm which adjusts the generation flow by modifying the detected artifact units to improve the quality of generation while preserving the original outline. Our method outperforms the baseline method in terms of FID-score and shows satisfactory results with human evaluation. Ali Tousi, Haedong Jeong, Jiyeon Han 0001, Hwanil Choi, Jaesik Choi |
CVPR | 4 |