NIST’s Privacy Risk Assessment Methodology (PRAM) provides a structured framework for privacy experts to assess privacy risks. However, its complexity and reliance on expert knowledge make it difficult for novice developers to use effectively. This paper explores methods to lower these barriers. We first performed an observational study with 12 participants using PRAM in real-world scenarios, and found that novice developers struggled most with articulating privacy-related design decisions. We then developed PrivacyAkinator, an interactive tool that helps developers articulate key privacy decisions by answering LLM-generated multiple-choice questions. PrivacyAkinator introduces three innovations: a universal privacy representation that abstracts privacy-related design decisions into data flows and stakeholder interactions; a domain-aware design space mined from 10K privacy-related news articles; and a dynamic question-generation workflow to prioritize relevant questions. Our user study with 24 participants suggests that developers using PrivacyAkinator identified 47% more key decisions in 73% less time compared to PRAM.

Longxuan Yu, Delin Chen, Siheng Xiong, Qingyang Wu, Dawei Li, Zhikai Chen, Xiaoze Liu, Liangming Pan. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025.

We present Moderator, a policy-based model management system that allows administrators to specify fine-grained content moderation policies and modify the weights of a text-to-image (TTI) model to make it significantly more challenging for users to produce images that violate the policies. In contrast to existing general-purpose model editing techniques, which unlearn concepts without considering the associated contexts, Moderator allows admins to specify what content should be moderated, under which context, how it should be moderated, and why moderation is necessary. Given a set of policies, Moderator first prompts the original model to generate images that need to be moderated, then uses these self-generated images to reverse fine-tune the model to compute task vectors for moderation and finally negates the original model with the task vectors to decrease its performance in generating moderated content. We evaluated Moderator with 14 participants to play the role of admins and found they could quickly learn and author policies to pass unit tests in approximately 2.29 policy iterations. Our experiment with 32 stable diffusion users suggested that Moderator can prevent 65% of users from generating moderated content under 15 attempts and require the remaining users an average of 8.3 times more attempts to generate undesired content.