Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Meghavarshini Krishnaswamy
dblp:290/5863
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Collaborative and social computing · 50% Wearable and physiological sensing · 50% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 64% Multi-agent systems · 19% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 17% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Probabilistic Modeling of Interpersonal Coordination Processes · ICML 2024 |
Wearable and physiological sensing › multimodal sensing
multimodal physiological sensing |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | The ToMCAT Dataset · NeurIPS 2023 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › multi-agent coordination
team coordination |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Probabilistic Modeling of Interpersonal Coordination Processes · ICML 2024 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
plan recognition |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | The ToMCAT Dataset · NeurIPS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
fNIRS · 1.3automatic speech recognition · 1.3EEG · 1.3eye-tracking · 0.7eye tracking · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Probabilistic Modeling of Interpersonal Coordination ProcessesabstractWe develop a novel probabilistic model for interpersonal coordination as a latent phenomenon explaining statistical temporal influence between multiple components in a system. For example, the state of one person can influence that of another at a later time, as indicated by their observed behaviors. We characterize coordination as the degree to which the distributions for such states at one time point are merged for the next salient time point. We evaluate our model in the context of three-person teams executing a virtual search and rescue (SAR) mission. We first use synthetic data to confirm that our technical definition of coordination is consistent with expectations and that we can recover generated coordination despite noise. We then show that captured coordination can be predictive of team performance on real data. Here we use speech vocalics and semantics to infer coordination for 36 teams carrying out two successive SAR missions. In two different datasets, we find that coordination is generally predictive of team score for the second mission, but not for the first, where teams are largely learning to play the game. In addition, we found that including a semantic modality improves prediction in some scenarios. This shows that our intuitive technical definition can capture useful explanatory aspects of team behavior. Paulo Soares, Adarsh Pyarelal, Meghavarshini Krishnaswamy, Emily Butler, Kobus Barnard |
ICML | 3 |
| 2023 | The ToMCAT DatasetabstractWe present a rich, multimodal dataset consisting of data from 40 teams of three humans conducting simulated urban search-and-rescue (SAR) missions in a Minecraft-based testbed, collected for the Theory of Mind-based Cognitive Architecture for Teams (ToMCAT) project. Modalities include two kinds of brain scan data---functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and electroencephalography (EEG), as well as skin conductance, heart rate, eye tracking, face images, spoken dialog audio data with automatic speech recognition (ASR) transcriptions, game screenshots, gameplay data, game performance data, demographic data, and self-report questionnaires. Each team undergoes up to six consecutive phases: three behavioral tasks, one mission training session, and two collaborative SAR missions. As time-synchronized multimodal data collected under a variety of circumstances, this dataset will support studying a large variety of research questions on topics including teamwork, coordination, plan recognition, affective computing, physiological linkage, entrainment, and dialog understanding. We provide an initial public release of the de-identified data, along with analyses illustrating the utility of this dataset to both computer scientists and social scientists. Adarsh Pyarelal, Eric Duong, Caleb Shibu, Paulo Soares, Savannah Boyd, Payal Khosla, Valeria A. Pfeifer, Diheng Zhang, Eric Andrews, Rick Champlin, Vincent Raymond, Meghavarshini Krishnaswamy, Clayton T. Morrison, Emily Butler, Kobus Barnard |
NeurIPS | 12 |