Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Steven Sleder

dblp:290/6025 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 3 · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
2 papers
Cellular and mobile networks · 67% Vehicular, aerial and satellite networks · 16% Transport protocols and congestion control · 9%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cellular and mobile networks
5g
1.822026
Teleoperating Autonomous Vehicles Over Commercial 5G Networks: Are We There Yet? · IEEE Trans. Netw. 2026
Dissecting Carrier Aggregation in 5G Networks: Measurement, QoE Implications and Prediction · SIGCOMM 2024
Vehicular, aerial and satellite networks › intelligent transportation systems
remote driving
1.012026
Teleoperating Autonomous Vehicles Over Commercial 5G Networks: Are We There Yet? · IEEE Trans. Netw. 2026
Cellular and mobile networks › low-latency communication
ultra-reliable low-latency communication
1.012026
Teleoperating Autonomous Vehicles Over Commercial 5G Networks: Are We There Yet? · IEEE Trans. Netw. 2026
Cellular and mobile networks › multi-connectivity
carrier aggregation
0.812024
Dissecting Carrier Aggregation in 5G Networks: Measurement, QoE Implications and Prediction · SIGCOMM 2024
Edge and fog computing
edge cloud
0.312026
Teleoperating Autonomous Vehicles Over Commercial 5G Networks: Are We There Yet? · IEEE Trans. Netw. 2026
Transport protocols and congestion control › real-time communication
real-time streaming
0.312026
Teleoperating Autonomous Vehicles Over Commercial 5G Networks: Are We There Yet? · IEEE Trans. Netw. 2026
Transport protocols and congestion control › real-time communication
WebRTC
0.312026
Teleoperating Autonomous Vehicles Over Commercial 5G Networks: Are We There Yet? · IEEE Trans. Netw. 2026
Content delivery and video streaming
quality of experience
0.212024
Dissecting Carrier Aggregation in 5G Networks: Measurement, QoE Implications and Prediction · SIGCOMM 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

qoe analysis · 1.0end-to-end measurement · 1.0cross-layer measurement · 1.0deep learning · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Teleoperating Autonomous Vehicles Over Commercial 5G Networks: Are We There Yet?
abstract
Remote driving, orteleoperating AutonomousVehicles (AVs), is a key application that emerging 5G networks aim to support. In this paper, we conduct a systematic feasibility study of AV teleoperation over commercial 5G networks from bothcross-layerandend-to-end (E2E)perspectives. Given the critical importance oftimely delivery of sensor data, such as camera and LiDAR data, for AV teleoperation, we focus in particular on the performance of uplink sensor data delivery. We analyze the impact of Physical Layer (PHY layer) 5G radio network factors, including channel conditions, radio resource allocation, and Handovers (HOs), on E2E latency performance. We also examine the impact of 5G networks on the performance of upper-layer protocols and E2E application Quality-of-Experience (QoE) of the adaptation mechanisms used for real-time sensor data delivery, such as Real-Time Streaming Protocol (RTSP) and Web Real Time Communication (WebRTC). Our study reveals the challenges posed by today’s 5G networks and the limitations of existing sensor data streaming mechanisms. The insights gained will help inform the co-design of future-generation wireless networks, edge cloud systems, and applications to overcome the low-latency barriers in AV teleoperation.
Rostand A. K. Fezeu, Jason Carpenter, Rushikesh Zende, Sree Ganesh Lalitaditya Divakarla, Nitin Varyani, Faaiq Bilal, Steven Sleder, Nanditha Naik, Duncan Joly, Eman Ramadan, Ajay Kumar Gurumadaiah, Zhi-Li Zhang
IEEE Trans. Netw.7
2024 Dissecting Carrier Aggregation in 5G Networks: Measurement, QoE Implications and Prediction
abstract
By aggregating multiple channels, Carrier Aggregation (CA) is an important technology for boosting cellular network bandwidth. Given diverse radio bands made available in 5G networks, CA plays a particularly critical role in achieving the goal of multi-Gbps throughput performance. In this paper, we carry out a timely comprehensive measurement study of CA deployment in commercial 5G networks (as well as 4G networks). We identify the key factors that influence whether CA is deployed and when, as well as which band combinations are used. Thus, we reveal the challenges posed by CA in 5G performance analysis and prediction as well as their implications in application quality-of-experience (QoE). We argue for and develop a novel CA-aware deep learning framework, dubbed Prism5G, which explicitly accounts for the complexity introduced by CA to more effectively predict 5G network throughput performance. Through extensive evaluations, we demonstrate the superiority of Prism5G over existing throughput prediction algorithms. Prism5G improves 5G throughput prediction accuracy by over 14% on average and a maximum of 22%. Using two use cases as examples, we further illustrate how Prism5G can aid applications in optimizing QoE performance.
Wei Ye 0009, Steven Sleder, Anlan Zhang, Udhaya Kumar Dayalan, Ahmad Hassan 0004, Rostand A. K. Fezeu, Akshay Jajoo, Myungjin Lee, Eman Ramadan, Feng Qian 0001, Zhi-Li Zhang
SIGCOMM3
2024 Bayesian Active Learning for Sample Efficient 5G Radio Map Reconstruction
abstract
The advent of diverse frequency bands in 5G networks has promoted measurement studies focused on 5G signal propagation, aiming to understand its pathloss, coverage, and channel quality characteristics. Nonetheless, conducting a thorough 5G measurement campaign is markedly laborious given the large number of samples that must be collected. To alleviate this burden, the present contribution leverages principled active learning (AL) methods to prudently select only a few, yet most informative locations to collect samples. The core idea is to rely on a Gaussian Process (GP) model to efficiently extrapolate measurements throughout the coverage area. Specifically, an ensemble (E) of GP models is adopted that not only provides a rich learning function space, but also quantifies uncertainty, and can offer accurate predictions. Building on this EGP model, a suite of acquisition functions (AFs) are advocated to query new locations on-the-fly. To account for realistic scenaria, the proposed AFs are augmented with a novel distance-based AL rule that selects informative samples, while penalizing queries at long distances. Numerical tests on 5G data generated by the Sionna simulator and on real urban and suburban datasets, showcase the merits of the novel EGP-AL approaches.
Konstantinos D. Polyzos, Wei Ye 0009, Steven Sleder, Kodjo Houssou, Jeff Calder, Zhi-Li Zhang, Georgios B. Giannakis
IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun.4
2021 Building representative and balanced datasets of OpenMP parallel regions
abstract
Incorporating machine learning into automatic performance analysis and tuning tools is a promising path to tackle the increasing heterogeneity of current HPC applications. However, this introduces the need for generating balanced and representative datasets of parallel applications' executions. This work proposes a methodology for building datasets of OpenMP parallel code regions patterns. It allows for determining whether a given code region covers a unique part of the pattern input space not covered by the patterns already included in the dataset. The proposed methodology uses hardware performance counters to represent the execution of the region, which is referred to as the region signature for a given number of cores. Then, a complete representation of the region is built by joining the signatures for every different thread configuration in the system. Next, correlation analysis is performed between this representation and the representation of all the patterns already in the training set. Finally, if this correlation is below a given threshold, the region is considered to cover a unique part of the pattern input space and is subsequently added to the dataset. For validating this methodology, an example dataset, obtained from well known benchmarks, has been used to train a carefully designed neural network model to demonstrate that it is able to classify different patterns of OpenMP parallel regions.
Jordi Alcaraz, Steven Sleder, Ali TehraniJamsaz, Anna Sikora, Ali Jannesari, Joan Sorribes, Eduardo César
PDP2