Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shiming Guo
dblp:290/8479
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Generative modeling · 100% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video processing · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › image diffusion model
diffusion-based image generation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | SGMHand: Structure-Guided Modulation for Structure-Aware Hand Inpainting · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | SGMHand: Structure-Guided Modulation for Structure-Aware Hand Inpainting · AAAI 2026 |
Image and video processing › image restoration
image inpainting |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | SGMHand: Structure-Guided Modulation for Structure-Aware Hand Inpainting · AAAI 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
structure-guided modulation · 2.0keypoint-aware loss · 2.0diffusion model · 2.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | SGMHand: Structure-Guided Modulation for Structure-Aware Hand InpaintingabstractDiffusion-based generative models have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in image synthesis, yet realistic hand generation remains a persistent challenge due to complex articulations, self-occlusion, and the lack of explicit structural guidance. To address these issues, we present SGMHand, a novel structure-guided hand inpainting framework that explicitly injects topological priors to enhance structural fidelity and spatial precision. Specifically, we present a structure-guided modulation (SGM) module that synergistically combines structure spatial attention with global feature calibration, enabling fine-grained geometric control over the generative process. Then, we devise a keypoint-aware (KA) loss that enforces topological coherence by aligning attention activations with structures, thereby bridging the gap between high-level semantics and low-level geometry. By jointly optimizing over structural constraints in both representation and learning objectives, SGMHand achieves semantically consistent and geometrically plausible hand synthesis, even under severe occlusion. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness and strong generalization ability of SGMHand across various foundation models, significantly enhancing the quality and realism of human image synthesis in diverse scenarios. Chuancheng Shi, Shiming Guo, Ke Shui, Fei Shen 0004 |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2020 | Defect Report Severity Prediction Based on Genetic Algorithms and Convolutional Neural NetworkabstractIn software maintainence, defect report severity prediction is an important task which can effectively help developer judge the urgency of defects. However, manually classifying the severity of defect reports is very time consuming and tedious. Recently, researchers have proposed many advanced methods to automate the severity prediction of defect reports. But there is still room for improvement in performance. Therefore, in this paper, we propose a distinctive method for automatically identifying the severity of software defect reports using convolutional neural network (CNN). We first preprocess defect reports and select textual features by genetic algorithms (GA). Then, the Word2Vec model is employed to generate word vectors for the selected features in each defect report. Finally we train the classifier based on CNN and leverage the trained classifier to predict the severity of defect reports. To validate the performance of our method, we experiment with defect reports from four open source projects and compare our method with three common machine learning methods. The experimental results show that our method achieves 77.38% in terms of precision, 62.09% in terms of recall and 68.76% in terms of Fl-score on average, and outperforms the best baseline method by 11.61%, 7.23% and 9.32%, respectively. Shiming Guo, Xin Chen 0032, Dongjin Yu |
TASE | 1 |