Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Dennis Hecker

dblp:290/8612 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-0272-243XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation
gene regulation analysis
1.012026
Predicting gene-specific regulation with transcriptomic and epigenetic single-cell data · Bioinform. 2026
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation › enhancer analysis
enhancer-gene interaction prediction
0.712023
The adapted Activity-By-Contact model for enhancer-gene assignment and its application to single-cell data · Bioinform. 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation
regulatory genomics
0.712023
The adapted Activity-By-Contact model for enhancer-gene assignment and its application to single-cell data · Bioinform. 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology
single-cell analysis
0.312026
Predicting gene-specific regulation with transcriptomic and epigenetic single-cell data · Bioinform. 2026
Bioinformatics and computational biology › single-cell analysis
single-cell epigenomics
0.212023
The adapted Activity-By-Contact model for enhancer-gene assignment and its application to single-cell data · Bioinform. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

regression tree · 1.0transcription factor binding integration · 0.7gene expression prediction · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Predicting gene-specific regulation with transcriptomic and epigenetic single-cell data
abstract
MOTIVATION: Analysis of single cell ATAC-seq and RNA-seq data has allowed to gain unprecedented insights into gene regulation by allowing to define cell type-specific regulatory regions and their effects on gene expression. While powerful, such analysis is challenging due to the inherent sparsity of single cell data. RESULTS: We present a new approach, MetaFR, to learn gene-specific models that link open-chromatin variation from scATAC-seq data to gene expression from scRNA-seq. Using efficient regression trees, we illustrate that accurate expression prediction models can be learned on the single-cell or meta-cell level. Validation was done using fine-mapped eQTLs. Meta-cell models were found to outperform single-cell models for most genes. Comparison to the SOTA method SCARlink revealed advantages of MetaFR in terms of runtime and prediction performance. MetaFR thus allows time-efficient analysis and obtains reliable models of gene expression prediction, which can be used to study gene regulation in any organism for which scRNA-seq and scATAC-seq data is available. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: MetaFR is available under https://github.com/SchulzLab/MetaFR.
Laura Rumpf, Fatemeh Behjati-Ardakani, Dennis Hecker, Marcel H. Schulz
Bioinform.3
2023 The adapted Activity-By-Contact model for enhancer-gene assignment and its application to single-cell data
abstract
MOTIVATION: Identifying regulatory regions in the genome is of great interest for understanding the epigenomic landscape in cells. One fundamental challenge in this context is to find the target genes whose expression is affected by the regulatory regions. A recent successful method is the Activity-By-Contact (ABC) model which scores enhancer-gene interactions based on enhancer activity and the contact frequency of an enhancer to its target gene. However, it describes regulatory interactions entirely from a gene's perspective, and does not account for all the candidate target genes of an enhancer. In addition, the ABC model requires two types of assays to measure enhancer activity, which limits the applicability. Moreover, there is neither implementation available that could allow for an integration with transcription factor (TF) binding information nor an efficient analysis of single-cell data. RESULTS: We demonstrate that the ABC score can yield a higher accuracy by adapting the enhancer activity according to the number of contacts the enhancer has to its candidate target genes and also by considering all annotated transcription start sites of a gene. Further, we show that the model is comparably accurate with only one assay to measure enhancer activity. We combined our generalized ABC model with TF binding information and illustrated an analysis of a single-cell ATAC-seq dataset of the human heart, where we were able to characterize cell type-specific regulatory interactions and predict gene expression based on TF affinities. All executed processing steps are incorporated into our new computational pipeline STARE. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The software is available at https://github.com/schulzlab/STARE. CONTACT: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Dennis Hecker, Fatemeh Behjati-Ardakani, Alexander Karollus, Julien Gagneur, Marcel H. Schulz
Bioinform.1