EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Haozhe Tian
dblp:290/9100
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-author · 5 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 53% Graph learning · 47% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Learning Network Dismantling Without Handcrafted Inputs · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
message passing |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Learning Network Dismantling Without Handcrafted Inputs · AAAI 2026 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › network analysis › network reliability
critical node identification |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Learning Network Dismantling Without Handcrafted Inputs · AAAI 2026 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › network analysis
network dismantling |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Learning Network Dismantling Without Handcrafted Inputs · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reinforcement learning for control |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Reinforcement Learning with Adaptive Regularization for Safe Control of Critical Systems · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › safe reinforcement learning
safe exploration |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Reinforcement Learning with Adaptive Regularization for Safe Control of Critical Systems · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
safe reinforcement learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Reinforcement Learning with Adaptive Regularization for Safe Control of Critical Systems · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
message iteration · 2.0attention mechanism · 2.0policy regularization · 0.8adaptive regularization · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Learning Network Dismantling Without Handcrafted InputsabstractThe application of message-passing Graph Neural Networks has been a breakthrough for important network science problems. However, the competitive performance often relies on using handcrafted structural features as inputs, which increases computational cost and introduces bias into the otherwise purely data-driven network representations. Here, we eliminate the need for handcrafted features by introducing an attention mechanism and utilizing message-iteration profiles, in addition to an effective algorithmic approach to generate a structurally diverse training set of small synthetic networks. Thereby, we build an expressive message-passing framework and use it to efficiently solve the NP-hard problem of Network Dismantling, virtually equivalent to vital node identification, with significant real-world applications. Trained solely on diversified synthetic networks, our proposed model—MIND: Message Iteration Network Dismantler—generalizes to large, unseen real networks with millions of nodes, outperforming state-of-the-art network dismantling methods. Increased efficiency and generalizability of the proposed model can be leveraged beyond dismantling in a range of complex network problems. Haozhe Tian, Pietro Ferraro, Robert Shorten, Mahdi Jalili, Homayoun Hamedmoghadam |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2026 | Enhancing visual inertial odometry with efficient dynamic PerceptionNet and consistency improvement fusion
Ganchao Liu, Haozhe Tian, Yuan Yuan 0001 |
Pattern Recognit. | 2 |
| 2024 | Reinforcement Learning with Adaptive Regularization for Safe Control of Critical SystemsabstractReinforcement Learning (RL) is a powerful method for controlling dynamic systems, but its learning mechanism can lead to unpredictable actions that undermine the safety of critical systems. Here, we propose RL with Adaptive Regularization (RL-AR), an algorithm that enables safe RL exploration by combining the RL policy with a policy regularizer that hard-codes the safety constraints. RL-AR performs policy combination via a "focus module," which determines the appropriate combination depending on the state—relying more on the safe policy regularizer for less-exploited states while allowing unbiased convergence for well-exploited states. In a series of critical control applications, we demonstrate that RL-AR not only ensures safety during training but also achieves a return competitive with the standards of model-free RL that disregards safety. Haozhe Tian, Homayoun Hamedmoghadam, Robert Shorten, Pietro Ferraro |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2023 | CGP: Centroid-guided Graph Poisoning for Link Inference Attacks in Graph Neural NetworksabstractGraph Neural Network (GNN) is the state-of-the-art machine learning model on graph data, which many modern big data applications rely on. However, GNN’s potential leakage of sensitive graph node relationships (i.e., links) could cause severe user privacy infringements. An attacker might infer the sensitive graph links from the posteriors of a GNN. Such attacks are named graph link inference attacks. While most existing research considers attack settings without malicious users, this work considers the setting where some malicious nodes are established by the attacker. This setting enables link inference without relying on the estimation of the number of links in the target graph, which significantly enhances the practicality of link inference attacks. This work further proposes centroid-guided graph poisoning (CGP). Without participating in the training process of the target model, CGP operates on links between malicious nodes to make the target model more vulnerable to graph link inference attacks. Experiment results in this work demonstrate that using less than 5% of malicious nodes, i.e. modifying approximately 0.25% of all links, CGP can increase the F-1 of graph link inference attacks by up to 4%. Haozhe Tian, Haibo Hu 0001, Qingqing Ye 0001 |
IEEE Big Data | 1 |
| 2023 | A review of deep learning segmentation methods for carotid artery ultrasound images
Qinghua Huang, Haozhe Tian, Lizhi Jia, Zishu Zhou 0002 |
Neurocomputing | 2 |