Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yuna Hur

dblp:291/4254 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-5997-1627ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Question answering and dialogue systems · 68% Language models and text generation · 18% Information extraction and text analysis · 14%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › table question answering
multi-table question answering
1.012026
EASE: Entity-Aware Sub-table Generation for Real-world Multi-table QA · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
table question answering
1.012026
EASE: Entity-Aware Sub-table Generation for Real-world Multi-table QA · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
entity discovery
0.712023
Post-hoc Utterance Refining Method by Entity Mining for Faithful Knowledge Grounded Conversations · EMNLP 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
faithful generation
0.712023
Post-hoc Utterance Refining Method by Entity Mining for Faithful Knowledge Grounded Conversations · EMNLP 2023
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
knowledge-grounded dialogue
0.712023
Post-hoc Utterance Refining Method by Entity Mining for Faithful Knowledge Grounded Conversations · EMNLP 2023
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
task-oriented dialogue
0.612022
Call for Customized Conversation: Customized Conversation Grounding Persona and Knowledge · AAAI 2022
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
pre-trained language model
0.212022
Call for Customized Conversation: Customized Conversation Grounding Persona and Knowledge · AAAI 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

entity-aware sub-table generation · 1.0post-hoc refinement · 0.7GPT-2 · 0.6BART · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 EASE: Entity-Aware Sub-table Generation for Real-world Multi-table QA
abstract
Myunghoon Kang, Dahyun Jung, Suhyune Son, Seonmin Koo, Changwoo Chun, Daniel Rim, Haeyoung Kwon, Yuna Hur, Heuiseok Lim. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026.
Myunghoon Kang, Dahyun Jung, Suhyune Son, Seonmin Koo, Changwoo Chun, Daniel Rim, Haeyoung Kwon, Yuna Hur, Heuiseok Lim
ACL (1)8
2023 Post-hoc Utterance Refining Method by Entity Mining for Faithful Knowledge Grounded Conversations
abstract
Yoonna Jang, Suhyune Son, Jeongwoo Lee, Junyoung Son, Yuna Hur, Jungwoo Lim, Hyeonseok Moon, Kisu Yang, Heuiseok Lim. Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2023.
Yoonna Jang, Suhyune Son, Junyoung Son, Yuna Hur, Jungwoo Lim, Hyeonseok Moon, Kisu Yang, Heuiseok Lim
EMNLP5
2022 Call for Customized Conversation: Customized Conversation Grounding Persona and Knowledge
abstract
Humans usually have conversations by making use of prior knowledge about a topic and background information of the people whom they are talking to. However, existing conversational agents and datasets do not consider such comprehensive information, and thus they have a limitation in generating the utterances where the knowledge and persona are fused properly. To address this issue, we introduce a call For Customized conversation (FoCus) dataset where the customized answers are built with the user's persona and Wikipedia knowledge. To evaluate the abilities to make informative and customized utterances of pre-trained language models, we utilize BART and GPT-2 as well as transformer-based models. We assess their generation abilities with automatic scores and conduct human evaluations for qualitative results. We examine whether the model reflects adequate persona and knowledge with our proposed two sub-tasks, persona grounding (PG) and knowledge grounding (KG). Moreover, we show that the utterances of our data are constructed with the proper knowledge and persona through grounding quality assessment.
Yoonna Jang, Jungwoo Lim, Yuna Hur, Dongsuk Oh, Suhyune Son, Yeonsoo Lee, Dong-Hoon Shin, Seungryong Kim, Heuiseok Lim
AAAI3