EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jannis Clausius
dblp:291/4577
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-6128-7071ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
3 papers |
Physical-layer communications · 95% Cellular and mobile networks · 5% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Coding theory · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs · 100% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › decoding
iterative decoding |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Joint Detection and Decoding: A Graph Neural Network Approach · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2025 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › decoding › channel decoding
joint detection and decoding |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Joint Detection and Decoding: A Graph Neural Network Approach · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2025 |
Physical-layer communications
equalization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Learning Joint Detection, Equalization and Decoding for Short-Packet Communications · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2023 |
Physical-layer communications › signal detection › joint detection
joint detection and decoding |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Learning Joint Detection, Equalization and Decoding for Short-Packet Communications · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2023 |
Physical-layer communications › equalization › nonlinear equalization
neural network equalizer |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Learning Joint Detection, Equalization and Decoding for Short-Packet Communications · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2023 |
Physical-layer communications
signal processing for communications |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Learning Joint Detection, Equalization and Decoding for Short-Packet Communications · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2023 |
Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs
FPGA accelerator |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | FPGA-based Trainable Autoencoder for Communication Systems · FPGA 2022 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
LDPC codes |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Joint Detection and Decoding: A Graph Neural Network Approach · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2025 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › LDPC codes
tanner graph |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Joint Detection and Decoding: A Graph Neural Network Approach · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2025 |
Cellular and mobile networks
short packet transmission |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Learning Joint Detection, Equalization and Decoding for Short-Packet Communications · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2023 |
Physical-layer communications › deep learning for communications
autoencoder-based communication |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | FPGA-based Trainable Autoencoder for Communication Systems · FPGA 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sum-product algorithm · 1.7graph neural network · 1.7factor graph · 1.7end-to-end learning · 1.7online training · 1.1artificial neural network · 1.1turbo autoencoder · 0.7neural network · 0.7autoencoder · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Bounds for Joint Detection and Decoding on the Binary-Input AWGN ChannelabstractFor asynchronous transmission of short blocks, preambles for packet detection contribute a non-negligible overhead. To reduce the required preamble length, joint detection and decoding (JDD) techniques have been proposed that additionally utilize the payload part of the packet for detection. In this paper, we analyze two instances of JDD, namely hybrid preamble and energy detection (HyPED) and decoder-aided detection (DAD). While HyPED combines the preamble with energy detection for the payload, DAD also uses the output of a channel decoder. For these systems, we propose novel achievability and converse bounds for the rates over the binary-input additive white Gaussian noise (BI-AWGN) channel. Moreover, we derive a general bound on the required blocklength for JDD. Both the theoretical bound and the simulation of practical codebooks show that the rate of DAD quickly approaches that of synchronous transmission. Simon Obermüller, Jannis Clausius, Marvin Rübenacke, Stephan ten Brink |
WCNC | 2 |
| 2025 | Joint Detection and Decoding: A Graph Neural Network ApproachabstractNarrowing the performance gap between optimal and feasible detection in inter-symbol interference (ISI) channels, this paper proposes to use graph neural networks (GNNs) for detection that can also be used to perform joint detection and decoding (JDD). For detection, the GNN is build upon the factor graph representations of the channel, while for JDD, the factor graph is expanded by the Tanner graph of the parity-check matrix (PCM) of the channel code, sharing the variable nodes (VNs). A particularly advantageous property of the GNN is a) the robustness against cycles in the factor graphs which is the main problem for sum-product algorithm (SPA)-based detection, and b) the robustness against channel state information (CSI) uncertainty at the receiver. Consequently, a fully deep learning-based receiver enables joint optimization instead of individual optimization of the components, so-called end-to-end learning. Furthermore, we propose a parallel flooding schedule that also reduces the latency, which turns out to improve the error correcting performance. The proposed approach is analyzed and compared to state-of-the-art baselines for different modulations and codes in terms of error correcting capability and latency. The gain compared to SPA-based detection might be explained with improved messages between nodes and adaptive damping of messages. For a higher order modulation in a high-rate turbo detection and decoding (TDD) scenario the GNN shows a, at first glance, surprisingly high gain of 6.25 dB compared to the best, feasible non-neural baseline. Jannis Clausius, Marvin Rübenacke, Daniel Tandler, Stephan ten Brink |
IEEE Trans. Commun. | 1 |
| 2024 | Graph Neural Network-Based Joint Equalization and DecodingabstractThis paper proposes to use graph neural networks (GNNs) for equalization, that can also be used to perform joint equalization and decoding (JED). For equalization, the GNN is build upon the factor graph representations of the channel, while for JED, the factor graph is expanded by the Tanner graph of the parity-check matrix (PCM) of the channel code, sharing the variable nodes (VNs). A particularly advantageous property of the GNN is the robustness against cycles in the factor graphs which is the main problem for belief propagation (BP)-based equalization. As a result of having a fully deep learning-based receiver, joint optimization instead of individual optimization of the components is enabled, so-called end-to-end learning. Furthermore, we propose a parallel flooding schedule that further reduces the latency, which turns out to improve also the error correcting performance. The proposed approach is analyzed and compared to state-of-the-art baselines in terms of error correcting capability and latency. At a fixed low latency, the flooding GNN for JED demonstrates a gain of 2.25 dB in bit error rate (BER) compared to an iterative Bahl-Cocke-Jelinek-Raviv (BCJR)-BP baseline. Jannis Clausius, Marvin Geiselhart, Daniel Tandler, Stephan ten Brink |
ISIT | 1 |
| 2023 | Learning Joint Detection, Equalization and Decoding for Short-Packet CommunicationsabstractWe propose and practically demonstrate a joint detection and decoding scheme for short-packet wireless communications in scenarios that require to first detect the presence of a message before actually decoding it. For this, we extend the recently proposed serial Turbo-autoencoder neural network (NN) architecture and train it to find short messages that can be, all “at once”, detected, synchronized, equalized and decoded when sent over an unsynchronized channel with memory. The conceptional advantage of the proposed system stems from a holistic message structure with superimposed pilots for joint detection and decoding without the need of relying on a dedicated preamble. This results not only in a higher spectral efficiency, but also translates into the possibility of shorter messages compared to using a dedicated preamble. We compare the detection error rate (DER), bit error rate (BER) and block error rate (BLER) performance of the proposed system with a hand-crafted state-of-the-art conventional baseline and our simulations show a significant advantage of the proposed autoencoder-based system over the conventional baseline in every scenario up to messages conveying$k\!=\!96$information bits. Finally, we practically evaluate and confirm the improved performance of the proposed system over-the-air (OTA) using a software-defined radio (SDR)-based measurement testbed. Sebastian Dörner, Jannis Clausius, Sebastian Cammerer, Stephan ten Brink |
IEEE Trans. Commun. | 2 |
| 2022 | FPGA-based Trainable Autoencoder for Communication SystemsabstractIn communication systems, autoencoder refers to a system that replaces parts of the traditional transmitter and receiver of the baseband processing chain with artificial neural networks (ANNs). This allows to jointly train the system for an underlying channel model by reconstructing the input symbols at the output. Since the actual behavior of a real communication channel cannot be perfectly reproduced by an abstract model, it is necessary for the autoencoder to adapt to the changing conditions at runtime. Thus, online fine-tuning, in the form of ANN-retraining is of great importance. A platform able to satisfy the low-latency and low-power requirements of embedded communication systems are Field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs). In this paper, we present an online-trainable low-power FPGA architecture for the receiver of an autoencoder-based communication chain. The architecture is embedded into an exploration framework that automatically determines the optimal degree of parallelism to minimize latency or power consumption. Our solutions achieve 2000×higher throughput than a high-performance GPU, draw 5×less power than an embedded CPU and are 5800×more energy efficient compared to an embedded GPU, for a batch size of one. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first FPGA-based autoencoder implementation for communication systems. Jonas Ney, Sebastian Dörner, Matthias Herrmann, Mohammad Hassani Sadi, Jannis Clausius, Stephan ten Brink, Norbert Wehn |
FPGA | 5 |
| 2022 | A Polar Subcode Approach to Belief Propagation List DecodingabstractPermutation decoding gained recent interest as it can exploit the symmetries of a code in a parallel fashion. Moreover, it has been shown that by viewing permuted polar codes as polar subcodes, the set of usable permutations in permutation decoding can be increased. We extend this idea to pre-transformed polar codes, such as cyclic redundancy check (CRC)-aided polar codes, which previously could not be decoded using permutations due to their lack of automorphisms. Using belief propagation (BP)-based subdecoders, we showcase a performance close to CRC-aided SCL (CA-SCL) decoding. The proposed algorithm outperforms the previously best performing iterative CRC-aided belief propagation list (CA-BPL) decoder both in error-rate performance and decoding latency. Marvin Geiselhart, Ahmed Elkelesh, Jannis Clausius, Stephan ten Brink |
ITW | 3 |