Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sriram Yenamandra

dblp:291/9224 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
2as first author
7since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 2 first-author · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
6 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 39% Robot navigation and mapping · 8% Question answering and dialogue systems · 8%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 16 heaviest of 20, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
1.322023
LANCE: Stress-testing Visual Models by Generating Language-guided Counterfactual Images · NeurIPS 2023
FACTS: First Amplify Correlations and Then Slice to Discover Bias · ICCV 2023
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
embodied navigation
0.812024
GOAT-Bench: A Benchmark for Multi-Modal Lifelong Navigation · CVPR 2024
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › multimodal question answering
embodied question answering
0.812024
OpenEQA: Embodied Question Answering in the Era of Foundation Models · CVPR 2024
Computer vision › 3D vision
environmental understanding
0.812024
OpenEQA: Embodied Question Answering in the Era of Foundation Models · CVPR 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
bias identification
0.712023
FACTS: First Amplify Correlations and Then Slice to Discover Bias · ICCV 2023
Machine learning › Generative modeling › conditional generative model
counterfactual image generation
0.712023
LANCE: Stress-testing Visual Models by Generating Language-guided Counterfactual Images · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness
0.712023
FACTS: First Amplify Correlations and Then Slice to Discover Bias · ICCV 2023
Computer vision › Vision and language › language-guided learning › language-guided vision
language-guided image editing
0.712023
LANCE: Stress-testing Visual Models by Generating Language-guided Counterfactual Images · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
spurious correlation
0.712023
FACTS: First Amplify Correlations and Then Slice to Discover Bias · ICCV 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › model robustness evaluation
stress testing
0.712023
LANCE: Stress-testing Visual Models by Generating Language-guided Counterfactual Images · NeurIPS 2023
Data mining
clustering
0.712023
FACTS: First Amplify Correlations and Then Slice to Discover Bias · ICCV 2023
Data mining › clustering
mixture modeling
0.712023
FACTS: First Amplify Correlations and Then Slice to Discover Bias · ICCV 2023
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
commonsense reasoning
0.612022
Housekeep: Tidying Virtual Households Using Commonsense Reasoning · ECCV (39) 2022
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › self-supervised representation learning › masked modeling
masked image modeling
0.612022
Adapting Self-Supervised Vision Transformers by Probing Attention-Conditioned Masking Consistency · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain adaptation
visual domain adaptation
0.612022
Adapting Self-Supervised Vision Transformers by Probing Attention-Conditioned Masking Consistency · NeurIPS 2022
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object recognition
0.212022
Adapting Self-Supervised Vision Transformers by Probing Attention-Conditioned Masking Consistency · NeurIPS 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

strongly regularized empirical risk minimization · 1.3mixture modeling · 1.3correlation-aware slicing · 1.3reinforcement learning · 0.8modular navigation · 0.8large language model evaluation · 0.8foundation model · 0.8text-based image editing · 0.7large language model · 0.7virtual household simulation · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 GOAT-Bench: A Benchmark for Multi-Modal Lifelong Navigation
abstract
The Embodied AI community has made significant strides in visual navigation tasks, exploring targets from 3D coordinates, objects, language descriptions, and images. However, these navigation models often handle only a single input modality as the target. With the progress achieved so for, it is time to move towards universal navigation models capable of handling various goal types, enabling more effective user interaction with robots. To facilitate this goal, we propose GOAT-Bench, a benchmark for the universal navigation task referred to as GO to AnyThing (GOAT). In this task, the agent is directed to navigate to a sequence of targets specified by the category name, language description, or image in an open-vocabulary fashion. We benchmark monolithic RL and modular methods on the GOAT task, analyzing their performance across modalities, the role of explicit and implicit scene memories, their robustness to noise in goal specifications, and the impact of memory in lifelong scenarios.
Mukul Khanna, Ram Ramrakhya, Gunjan Chhablani, Sriram Yenamandra, Théophile Gervet, Matthew Chang, Zsolt Kira, Devendra Singh Chaplot, Dhruv Batra, Roozbeh Mottaghi
CVPR4
2024 OpenEQA: Embodied Question Answering in the Era of Foundation Models
abstract
We present a modern formulation of Embodied Question Answering (EQA) as the task of understanding an environment well enough to answer questions about it in natural language. An agent can achieve such an understanding by either drawing upon episodic memory, exemplified by agents on smart glasses, or by actively exploring the environment, as in the case of mobile robots. We accompany our formulation with OpenEQA - the first open-vocabulary benchmark dataset for EQA supporting both episodic memory and active exploration use cases. OpenEQA contains over 1600 high-quality human generated questions drawn from over 180 real-world environments. In addition to the dataset, we also provide an automatic LLM-powered evaluation protocol that has excellent correlation with human judgement. Using this dataset and evaluation protocol, we evaluate several state-of-the-art foundation models including GPT-4V, and find that they significantly lag behind human-level performance. Consequently, OpenEQA stands out as a straightforward, measurable, and practically rele-vant benchmark that poses a considerable challenge to current generation offoundation models. We hope this inspires and stimulates future research at the intersection of Embod-ied AI, conversational agents, and world models.
Arjun Majumdar, Anurag Ajay, Xiaohan Zhang 0002, Pranav Putta, Sriram Yenamandra, Mikael Henaff, Sneha Silwal, Paul McVay, Oleksandr Maksymets, Sergio Arnaud, Karmesh Yadav, Qiyang Li, Ben Newman, Mohit Sharma 0001, Vincent-Pierre Berges, Shiqi Zhang 0001, Pulkit Agrawal 0001, Yonatan Bisk, Dhruv Batra, Mrinal Kalakrishnan, Franziska Meier, Chris Paxton 0001, Alexander Sax, Aravind Rajeswaran
CVPR5
2023 FACTS: First Amplify Correlations and Then Slice to Discover Bias
abstract
Computer vision datasets frequently contain spurious correlations between task-relevant labels and (easy to learn) latent task-irrelevant attributes (e.g. context). Models trained on such datasets learn "shortcuts" and underperform on bias-conflicting slices of data where the correlation does not hold. In this work, we study the problem of identifying such slices to inform downstream bias mitigation strategies. We propose First Amplify Correlations and Then Slice (FACTS), wherein we first amplify correlations to fit a simple bias-aligned hypothesis via strongly regularized empirical risk minimization. Next, we perform correlation-aware slicing via mixture modeling in bias-aligned feature space to discover underperforming data slices that capture distinct correlations. Despite its simplicity, our method considerably improves over prior work (by as much as 35% precision@10) in correlation bias identification across a range of diverse evaluation settings. Code: https://github.com/yvsriram/FACTS.
Sriram Yenamandra, Pratik Ramesh, Viraj Prabhu, Judy Hoffman
ICCV1
2023 LANCE: Stress-testing Visual Models by Generating Language-guided Counterfactual Images
abstract
We propose an automated algorithm to stress-test a trained visual model by generating language-guided counterfactual test images (LANCE). Our method leverages recent progress in large language modeling and text-based image editing to augment an IID test set with a suite of diverse, realistic, and challenging test images without altering model weights. We benchmark the performance of a diverse set of pre-trained models on our generated data and observe significant and consistent performance drops. We further analyze model sensitivity across different types of edits, and demonstrate its applicability at surfacing previously unknown class-level model biases in ImageNet. Code is available at https://github.com/virajprabhu/lance.
Viraj Prabhu, Sriram Yenamandra, Prithvijit Chattopadhyay, Judy Hoffman
NeurIPS2
2022 Housekeep: Tidying Virtual Households Using Commonsense Reasoning
Yash Kant, Arun Ramachandran, Sriram Yenamandra, Igor Gilitschenski, Dhruv Batra, Andrew Szot, Harsh Agrawal
ECCV (39)3
2022 Adapting Self-Supervised Vision Transformers by Probing Attention-Conditioned Masking Consistency
abstract
Visual domain adaptation (DA) seeks to transfer trained models to unseen, unlabeled domains across distribution shift, but approaches typically focus on adapting convolutional neural network architectures initialized with supervised ImageNet representations. In this work, we shift focus to adapting modern architectures for object recognition -- the increasingly popular Vision Transformer (ViT) -- initialized with modern pretraining based on self-supervised learning (SSL). Inspired by the design of recent SSL approaches based on learning from partial image inputs generated via masking or cropping -- either by learning to predict the missing pixels, or learning representational invariances to such augmentations -- we propose PACMAC, a two-stage adaptation algorithm for self-supervised ViTs. PACMAC first performs in-domain SSL on pooled source and target data to learn task-discriminative features, and then probes the model's predictive consistency across a set of partial target inputs generated via a novel attention-conditioned masking strategy, to identify reliable candidates for self-training. Our simple approach leads to consistent performance gains over competing methods that use ViTs and self-supervised initializations on standard object recognition benchmarks. Our code is available at https://github.com/virajprabhu/PACMAC.
Viraj Prabhu, Sriram Yenamandra, Aaditya Singh, Judy Hoffman
NeurIPS2
2021 FaaSter: Accelerated Functions-as-a-Service with Heterogeneous GPUs
abstract
In this work, we present FaaSter, an Accelerated Functions as a Service (AFaaS) offering that unifies the function-as-a-service model with GPU acceleration resources. FaaSter provides an acceleration function library as a service, which in turn is provisioned on heterogeneous GPUs. To provide seamless access to these accelerated functions and ensure that each function has the best possible response time, we utilize GPU kernel slicing to split and execute an accelerated function instance across multiple heterogeneous GPUs. The central challenge is to be able to quickly decide the number of slices to split each function into and then map the slices to the right GPUs. To this end, we present a scheduling heuristic that is able to significantly reduce the average turn-around time of functions when compared to a non-sliceable full GPU scheduling approach. Our evaluation results show that the FaaSter scheduler achieves 62 % mean and up to 80 % improvement in average turn-around time and always performs equal to or better than non-sliceable GPU scheduling.
Anshuj Garg, Purushottam Kulkarni, Umesh Bellur, Sriram Yenamandra
HiPC4
2020 Learning Image Inpainting from Incomplete Images using Self-Supervision
abstract
Current approaches for semantic image inpainting rely on deep neural networks (DNNs) that learn under full supervision, i.e., using a training set comprising pairs of (i) corrupted images with holes and (ii) corresponding uncorrupted images. However, for several real-world applications, obtaining large sets of uncorrupted images is challenging or infeasible. Current methods also rely on adversarial training involving min-max optimization that is prone to instability during learning. We propose a novel self-supervised image-inpainting DNN framework that can learn in both completely unsupervised and semi-supervised modes. Moreover, our DNN learning formulation bypasses adversarial training and, thereby, lends itself to more stable training. Results on the publicly available CelebA dataset show that our method, even when learning unsupervisedly, outperforms the state of the art that learns with full supervision.
Sriram Yenamandra, Ansh Khurana, Rohit Jena, Suyash P. Awate
ICPR1