Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Amaya Dharmasiri

dblp:292/2540 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-6190-8317ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 61% Efficient and distributed learning · 17% Representation and self-supervised learning · 11%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-AI interaction · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › data selection
coreset selection
0.912025
The Impact of Coreset Selection on Spurious Correlations and Group Robustness · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness
0.912025
The Impact of Coreset Selection on Spurious Correlations and Group Robustness · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
group robustness
0.912025
The Impact of Coreset Selection on Spurious Correlations and Group Robustness · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
spurious correlation
0.912025
The Impact of Coreset Selection on Spurious Correlations and Group Robustness · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning
multimodal contrastive learning
0.612022
CrossPoint: Self-Supervised Cross-Modal Contrastive Learning for 3D Point Cloud Understanding · CVPR 2022
Computer vision › 3D vision
point cloud analysis
0.612022
CrossPoint: Self-Supervised Cross-Modal Contrastive Learning for 3D Point Cloud Understanding · CVPR 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
dataset bias
0.312025
The Impact of Coreset Selection on Spurious Correlations and Group Robustness · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.312025
The Impact of Coreset Selection on Spurious Correlations and Group Robustness · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

randomized experiment · 1.0sample difficulty scoring · 0.9empirical analysis · 0.9data selection policies · 0.9contrastive learning · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Presenting Large Language Models as Companions Affects What Mental Capacities People Attribute to Them
abstract
How might messages about large language models (LLMs) found in public discourse influence the way people think about and interact with these models? To explore this question, we randomly assigned participants (N = 470) to watch short informational videos presenting LLMs as either machines, tools, or companions -- or to watch no video. We then assessed how strongly they believed LLMs to possess various mental capacities, such as the ability to have intentions or remember things. We found that participants who watched video messages presenting LLMs as companions reported believing that LLMs more fully possessed these capacities than did participants in other groups. In a follow-up study (N = 604), we replicated these findings and found nuanced effects on how these videos also impact people's reliance on LLM-generated responses when seeking out factual information. Together, these studies suggest that messages about LLMs -- beyond technical advances -- may shape what people believe about these systems and how they rely on LLM-generated responses.
Allison Chen, Sunnie S. Y. Kim, Angel Nathaniel Franyutti-Cintron, Amaya Dharmasiri, Kushin Mukherjee, Olga Russakovsky, Judith E. Fan
CHI4
2025 Portraying Large Language Models as Machines, Tools, or Companions Affects What Mental Capacities People Attribute to Them
Allison Chen, Sunnie S. Y. Kim, Amaya Dharmasiri, Olga Russakovsky, Judith E. Fan
CogSci3
2025 The Impact of Coreset Selection on Spurious Correlations and Group Robustness
abstract
Coreset selection methods have shown promise in reducing the training data size while maintaining model performance for data-efficient machine learning. However, many large real-world datasets suffer from unknown spurious correlations and hidden biases. Therefore, it is crucial to understand how such biases would affect downstream tasks via the selected coresets. In this work, we conduct the first comprehensive analysis of the implications of data selection on the bias levels of the selected coresets and the robustness of downstream models trained on them. We use an extensive experimental setting spanning ten different spurious correlations benchmarks, five score metrics to characterize sample importance/ difficulty, and five data selection policies across a broad range of coreset sizes to identify important patterns and derive insights. Thereby, we unravel a series of nontrivial nuances in well-known interactions between sample difficulty and bias alignment, as well as dataset bias and resultant model robustness. For example, we show that embedding-based sample characterizations run a comparatively lower risk of inadvertently exacerbating bias when used for selecting coresets compared to characterizations based on learning dynamics. Our analysis also reveals that lower bias levels achieved by coresets of difficult samples do not reliably guarantee downstream robustness. Most importantly, we show that special considerations need to be made when the coreset size is very small, since there is a unique risk of highly prototypical coresets reaching high average performance while obscuring their low group-robustness.
Amaya Dharmasiri, William Yang, Polina Kirichenko, Lydia T. Liu, Olga Russakovsky
NeurIPS1
2022 CrossPoint: Self-Supervised Cross-Modal Contrastive Learning for 3D Point Cloud Understanding
abstract
Manual annotation of large-scale point cloud dataset for varying tasks such as 3D object classification, segmentation and detection is often laborious owing to the irregular structure of point clouds. Self-supervised learning, which operates without any human labeling, is a promising approach to address this issue. We observe in the real world that humans are capable of mapping the visual concepts learnt from 2D images to understand the 3D world. Encouraged by this insight, we propose CrossPoint, a simple cross-modal contrastive learning approach to learn transferable 3D point cloud representations. It enables a 3D-2D correspondence of objects by maximizing agreement between point clouds and the corresponding rendered 2D image in the invariant space, while encouraging invariance to transformations in the point cloud modality. Our joint training objective combines the feature correspondences within and across modalities, thus ensembles a rich learning signal from both 3D point cloud and 2D image modalities in a self-supervised fashion. Experimental results show that our approach outperforms the previous unsupervised learning methods on a diverse range of downstream tasks including 3D object classification and segmentation. Further, the ablation studies validate the potency of our approach for a better point cloud understanding. Code and pretrained models are available at https://github.com/MohamedAfham/CrossPoint.
Mohamed Afham, Isuru Dissanayake, Dinithi Dissanayake, Amaya Dharmasiri, Kanchana Thilakarathna, Ranga Rodrigo
CVPR4
2021 Viewport-aware dynamic 360° video segment categorization
abstract
Unlike conventional videos, 360° videos give freedom to users to turn their heads, watch and interact with the content owing to its immersive spherical environment. Although these movements are arbitrary, similarities can be observed between viewport patterns of different users and different videos. Identifying such patterns can assist both content and network providers to enhance the 360° video streaming process, eventually increasing the end-user Quality of Experience (QoE). But a study on how viewport patterns display similarities across different video content, and their potential applications has not yet been done. In this paper, we present a comprehensive analysis of a dataset of 88 360° videos and propose a novel video categorization algorithm that is based on similarities of viewports. First, we propose a novel viewport clustering algorithm that outperforms the existing algorithms in terms of clustering viewports with similar positioning and speed. Next, we develop a novel and unique dynamic video segment categorization algorithm that shows notable improvement in similarity for viewport distributions within the clusters when compared to that of existing static video categorizations.
Amaya Dharmasiri, Chamara Manoj Madarasingha Kattadige, Kanchana Thilakarathna
NOSSDAV1