Huancheng Puyang

dblp:292/3240 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Storage systems · 76% Parallel and multicore computing · 19% Cloud and datacenter computing · 6%
Computer networks
1 paper
Software-defined and programmable networks · 77% Internet architecture and protocols · 23%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Storage systems
distributed storage
0.912025
Toward Load-Balanced Redundancy Transitioning for Erasure-Coded Storage · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2025
Storage systems › storage reliability
erasure coding
0.912025
Toward Load-Balanced Redundancy Transitioning for Erasure-Coded Storage · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2025
Parallel and multicore computing
load balancing
0.912025
Toward Load-Balanced Redundancy Transitioning for Erasure-Coded Storage · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2025
Storage systems › repair
redundancy transitioning
0.912025
Toward Load-Balanced Redundancy Transitioning for Erasure-Coded Storage · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2025
Storage systems
storage reliability
0.912025
Toward Load-Balanced Redundancy Transitioning for Erasure-Coded Storage · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2025
Software-defined and programmable networks
programmable data plane
0.712023
FarReach: Write-back Caching in Programmable Switches · USENIX ATC 2023
Cloud and datacenter computing › cluster resource management and scheduling
cluster resource management
0.312025
Toward Load-Balanced Redundancy Transitioning for Erasure-Coded Storage · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2025
Internet architecture and protocols › information-centric networking
in-network caching
0.212023
FarReach: Write-back Caching in Programmable Switches · USENIX ATC 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

heuristic algorithm · 0.9programmable switch caching · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Toward Load-Balanced Redundancy Transitioning for Erasure-Coded Storage
abstract
Redundancy transitioning enables erasure-coded storage to adapt to varying performance and reliability requirements by re-encoding data with new coding parameters on-the-fly. Existing studies focus on bandwidth-driven redundancy transitioning that reduces the transitioning bandwidth across storage nodes, yet the actual redundancy transitioning performance remains bottlenecked by the most loaded node. We present BART, a load-balanced redundancy transitioning scheme that aims to reduce the redundancy transitioning time via carefully scheduled parallelization. We show that finding an optimal load-balanced solution is difficult due to the large solution space. Given this challenge, BART decomposes the redundancy transitioning problem into multiple sub-problems and solves the sub-problems via efficient heuristics. We evaluate BART using both simulations for large-scale storage and HDFS prototype experiments on Alibaba Cloud. We show that BART significantly reduces the redundancy transitioning time compared with the bandwidth-driven approach.
Keyun Cheng, Huancheng Puyang, Xiaolu Li 0002, Patrick P. C. Lee, Yuchong Hu, Jie Li 0019, Ting-Yi Wu
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst.2
2023 FarReach: Write-back Caching in Programmable Switches
Siyuan Sheng, Huancheng Puyang, Qun Huang 0001, Lu Tang 0004, Patrick P. C. Lee
USENIX ATC2
2021 Citadel: Protecting Data Privacy and Model Confidentiality for Collaborative Learning
abstract
Many organizations own data but have limited machine learning expertise (data owners). On the other hand, organizations that have expertise need data from diverse sources to train truly generalizable models (model owners). With the advancement of machine learning (ML) and its growing awareness, the data owners would like to pool their data and collaborate with model owners, such that both entities can benefit from the obtained models. In such a collaboration, the data owners want to protect the privacy of its training data, while the model owners desire the confidentiality of the model and the training method that may contain intellectual properties. Existing private ML solutions, such as federated learning and split learning, cannot simultaneously meet the privacy requirements of both data and model owners.
Chengliang Zhang, Junzhe Xia, Baichen Yang, Huancheng Puyang, Wei Wang 0030, Ruichuan Chen, Istemi Ekin Akkus, Paarijaat Aditya, Feng Yan 0001
SoCC4