Recent work on learning for classical planning has primarily focused on exclusively employing the learned heuristics or policies. However, no purely learning-based method has consistently outperformed state-of-the-art planners to date. To address this, we return to the research paradigm that integrates learned domain knowledge with traditional, non-learned planning techniques. We propose a novel and simple approach for learning transition classifiers, using tree-based statistical learning over description logic features. In experiments, we evaluate various strategies for integrating learned classifiers with the FF heuristic, a state-of-the-art non-learned heuristic. Our results demonstrate that augmenting classical heuristics with transition classifiers leads to substantial performance improvements. The strongest variant combines classifier-based lookahead search with learned knowledge to avoid transitions into unsolvable states, frequently outperforming state-of-the-art traditional and learning-based planners.

Recently, a simple but powerful language for expressing and learning general policies and problem decompositions (sketches) has been introduced in terms of rules defined over a set of Boolean and numerical features. In this work, we consider three extensions of this language aimed at making policies and sketches more flexible and reusable: internal memory states, as in finite state controllers; indexical features, whose values are a function of the state and a number of internal registers that can be loaded with objects; and modules that wrap up policies and sketches and allow them to call each other by passing parameters. In addition, unlike general policies that select state transitions rather than ground actions, the new language allows for the selection of such actions. The expressive power of the resulting language for policies and sketches is illustrated through a number of examples.

State symmetries play an important role in planning and generalized planning. In the first case, state symmetries can be used to reduce the size of the search; in the second, to reduce the size of the training set. In the case of general planning, however, it is also critical to distinguish non-symmetric states, i.e., states that represent non-isomorphic relational structures. However, while the language of first-order logic distinguishes non-symmetric states, the languages and architectures used to represent and learn general policies do not. In particular, recent approaches for learning general policies use state features derived from description logics or learned via graph neural networks (GNNs) that are known to be limited by the expressive power of C2, first-order logic with two variables and counting. In this work, we address the problem of detecting symmetries in planning and generalized planning and use the results to assess the expressive requirements for learning general policies over various planning domains. For this, we map planning states to plain graphs, run off-the-shelf algorithms to determine whether two states are isomorphic with respect to the goal, and run coloring algorithms to determine if C2 features computed logically or via GNNs distinguish non-isomorphic states. Symmetry detection results in more effective learning, while the failure to detect non-symmetries prevents general policies from being learned at all in certain domains.

Width-based planning methods deal with conjunctive goals by decomposing problems into subproblems of low width. Algorithms like SIW thus fail when the goal is not easily serializable in this way or when some of the subproblems have a high width. In this work, we address these limitations by using a simple but powerful language for expressing finer problem decompositions introduced recently by Bonet and Geffner, called policy sketches. A policy sketch R over a set of Boolean and numerical features is a set of sketch rules C → E that express how the values of these features are supposed to change. Like general policies, policy sketches are domain general, but unlike policies, the changes captured by sketch rules do not need to be achieved in a single step. We show that many planning domains that cannot be solved by SIW are provably solvable in low polynomial time with the SIWR algorithm, the version of SIW that employs user-provided policy sketches. Policy sketches are thus shown to be a powerful language for expressing domain-specific knowledge in a simple and compact way and a convenient alternative to languages such as HTNs or temporal logics. Furthermore, they make it easy to express general problem decompositions and prove key properties of them like their width and complexity.

Hierarchical policies are a key ingredient of intelligent behavior, expressing the different levels of abstraction involved in the solution of a problem. Learning hierarchical policies, however, remains a challenge, as no general learning principles have been identified for this purpose, despite the broad interest and vast literature in both model-free reinforcement learning and model-based planning. In this work, we introduce a principled method for learning hierarchical policies over classical planning domains, with no supervision from small instances. The method is based on learning to decompose problems into subproblems so that the subproblems have a lower complexity as measured by their width. Problems and subproblems are captured by means of sketch rules, and the scheme for reducing the width of sketch rules is applied iteratively until the final sketch rules have zero width and encode a general policy. We evaluate the learning method on a number of classical planning domains, analyze the resulting hierarchical policies, and prove their properties. We also show that learning hierarchical policies by learning and refining sketches iteratively is often more efficient than learning flat general policies in one shot.

Width-based planning methods deal with conjunctive goals by decomposing problems into subproblems of low width. Algorithms like SIW thus fail when the goal is not easily serializable in this way or when some of the subproblems have a high width. In this work, we address these limitations by using a simple but powerful language for expressing finer problem decompositions introduced recently by Bonet and Geffner, called policy sketches. A policy sketch R over a set of Boolean and numerical features is a set of sketch rules that express how the values of these features are supposed to change. Like general policies, policy sketches are domain general, but unlike policies, the changes captured by sketch rules do not need to be achieved in a single step. We show that many planning domains that cannot be solved by SIW are provably solvable in low polynomial time with the SIW_R algorithm, the version of SIW that employs user-provided policy sketches. Policy sketches are thus shown to be a powerful language for expressing domain-specific knowledge in a simple and compact way and a convenient alternative to languages such as HTNs or temporal logics. Furthermore, they make it easy to express general problem decompositions and prove key properties of them like their width and complexity.