Abstract Leapfrog Triejoin (LTJ) is arguably the most practical and popular worst-case-optimal (wco) algorithm for solving basic graph patterns in graph databases. Its main drawback is that it needs the database triples (subject, predicate, object) represented as paths in a trie, for each of the six orders of subject, predicate, and object. The resulting blowup in space makes most systems disregard LTJ or implement it only partially, which makes their corresponding algorithms non-wco. In this paper we show that, by using compact data structures, it is possible to build an index that at the same time matches the query time performance of the fastest classic wco index, and uses a fraction of the space of non-wco indices (which are much slower). Concretely, we make use of compact tree representations to store functional tries using one bit per trie edge, instead of one pointer, and further reduce the space by storing partial tries. Our most compact variant uses 5–6 times less space than classic wco implementations and 2–3 times less than classic non-wco systems. At solving queries, it is on par with the fastest classic wco system, and 30–40 times faster than non-wco systems. We further incorporate improved query resolution strategies into CompactLTJ variants, which makes it considerably faster than classic wco systems as well, on queries that do not output too many results. Finally, we show how CompactLTJ can incorporate dynamism without altering its performance, even under very demanding update regimes. We leave a public fully-functional implementation of CompactLTJ that can be directly used by practitioners.

We present a representation of trajectories moving through the space without any constraint. It combines an in-memory cached index based on compact data structures and a classic disk-based strategy. The first structure allows some loss of precision that is refined with the second component. This approach reduces the number of accesses to disk. Comparing it with a classical index like the MVR-tree, this structure obtains competitive times in queries like time slice and knn, and sharply outperforms it in time interval queries. In addition it can solve other queries not supported with the MVR-tree. The space usage of our structure is 24 times less than that of the classical spatio-temporal index.