Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lena Zou-Williams

dblp:292/5444 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Immersive interaction · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Immersive interaction › virtual reality
cinematic virtual reality
0.512021
Comparing the Neuro-Physiological Effects of Cinematic Virtual Reality with 2D Monitors · VR 2021
Immersive interaction
presence and immersion
0.112021
Comparing the Neuro-Physiological Effects of Cinematic Virtual Reality with 2D Monitors · VR 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user study · 0.5electroencephalography · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Comparing the Neuro-Physiological Effects of Cinematic Virtual Reality with 2D Monitors
abstract
In this work, we explore if the immersion afforded by Virtual Reality can improve the cognitive integration of information in Cinematic Virtual Reality (CVR). We conducted a user study examining participants' cognitive activities (recall performance and cortical response) when consuming visual information of emotional and emotionally neutral scenes in a non-CVR environment (i.e. a monitor) versus a CVR environment (i.e. a head-mounted display). Cortical response was recorded using electroencephalography. The results showed that participants had greater early visual attention with neutral emotions in a CVR environment, and showed higher overall alpha power in a CVR environment. The use of CVR did not significantly affect participants' recall performance.
Ruochen Cao, Lena Zou-Williams, Andrew Cunningham, James A. Walsh, Mark Kohler, Bruce H. Thomas
VR2