Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Byeongjo Park

dblp:292/6324 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0009-7596-8685ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program synthesis and code generation · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data integration and cleaning · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Program synthesis and code generation
code generation with language models
0.812024
DataRecipe - How to Cook the Data for CodeLLM? · ASE 2024
Program synthesis and code generation › code generation with language models
training data quality
0.812024
DataRecipe - How to Cook the Data for CodeLLM? · ASE 2024
Data integration and cleaning
data quality
0.212024
DataRecipe - How to Cook the Data for CodeLLM? · ASE 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

semantic correlation analysis · 1.5metadata analysis · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 DataRecipe - How to Cook the Data for CodeLLM?
abstract
Despite the proliferation of language models, a lack of transparency persists regarding the training datasets used. Security concerns are often cited, but identifying high-quality training data is crucial for optimal model performance. Yet, while significant efforts have been made to improve model performance, dataset quality remains an under-explored area. Our study addresses this gap by comprehensively investigating data-quality properties and processing strategies used to train code generation models. We focus on identifying dataset features that impact model performance and leverage these insights to optimize datasets and enhance model efficacy. Our approach involves a multifaceted analysis encompassing metadata, statistics, data quality issues, semantic correlations between intent and code, and design choices. By manipulating these features, we explore their influence on model performance. Our findings reveal that dataset design choices significantly impact the performance of code generation models. Additionally, semantic correlations between intent and code can also affect performance, although to varying degrees.
Kisub Kim, Jounghoon Kim, Byeongjo Park, Dongsun Kim 0001, Chun Yong Chong, Tiezhu Sun, Daniel Tang, Jacques Klein, Tegawendé F. Bissyandé
ASE3