Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Byeongjo Park
dblp:292/6324
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0009-7596-8685ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program synthesis and code generation · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data integration and cleaning · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Program synthesis and code generation
code generation with language models |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | DataRecipe - How to Cook the Data for CodeLLM? · ASE 2024 |
Program synthesis and code generation › code generation with language models
training data quality |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | DataRecipe - How to Cook the Data for CodeLLM? · ASE 2024 |
Data integration and cleaning
data quality |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | DataRecipe - How to Cook the Data for CodeLLM? · ASE 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
semantic correlation analysis · 1.5metadata analysis · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | DataRecipe - How to Cook the Data for CodeLLM?abstractDespite the proliferation of language models, a lack of transparency persists regarding the training datasets used. Security concerns are often cited, but identifying high-quality training data is crucial for optimal model performance. Yet, while significant efforts have been made to improve model performance, dataset quality remains an under-explored area. Our study addresses this gap by comprehensively investigating data-quality properties and processing strategies used to train code generation models. We focus on identifying dataset features that impact model performance and leverage these insights to optimize datasets and enhance model efficacy. Our approach involves a multifaceted analysis encompassing metadata, statistics, data quality issues, semantic correlations between intent and code, and design choices. By manipulating these features, we explore their influence on model performance. Our findings reveal that dataset design choices significantly impact the performance of code generation models. Additionally, semantic correlations between intent and code can also affect performance, although to varying degrees. Kisub Kim, Jounghoon Kim, Byeongjo Park, Dongsun Kim 0001, Chun Yong Chong, Tiezhu Sun, Daniel Tang, Jacques Klein, Tegawendé F. Bissyandé |
ASE | 3 |