Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kathryn J. Lum

dblp:292/6350 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-8221-2458ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 3 · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
3 papers
Accessibility and assistive technology · 42% User interface design and tools · 26% Collaborative and social computing · 26%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video coding · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization
design optimization
0.822023
Maptimizer: Using Optimization to Tailor Tactile Maps to Users Needs · CHI 2022
OPTIMISM: Enabling Collaborative Implementation of Domain Specific Metaheuristic Optimization · CHI 2023
Collaborative and social computing
collaborative design
0.712023
OPTIMISM: Enabling Collaborative Implementation of Domain Specific Metaheuristic Optimization · CHI 2023
User interface design and tools
design tools
0.712023
OPTIMISM: Enabling Collaborative Implementation of Domain Specific Metaheuristic Optimization · CHI 2023
Accessibility and assistive technology › assistive technology for visual impairment
tactile maps
0.612022
Maptimizer: Using Optimization to Tailor Tactile Maps to Users Needs · CHI 2022
Mathematical optimization › design optimization
generative design
0.612022
Maptimizer: Using Optimization to Tailor Tactile Maps to Users Needs · CHI 2022
Mathematical optimization
metaheuristic optimization
0.212023
OPTIMISM: Enabling Collaborative Implementation of Domain Specific Metaheuristic Optimization · CHI 2023
Image and video coding › image compression
spatial coding
0.212022
Maptimizer: Using Optimization to Tailor Tactile Maps to Users Needs · CHI 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user study · 1.7two-stage optimization · 1.7metaheuristic optimization · 1.3interview study · 0.5design case study · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 OPTIMISM: Enabling Collaborative Implementation of Domain Specific Metaheuristic Optimization
abstract
For non-technical domain experts and designers it can be a substantial challenge to create designs that meet domain specific goals. This presents an opportunity to create specialized tools that produce optimized designs in the domain. However, implementing domain-specific optimization methods requires a rare combination of programming and domain expertise. Creating flexible design tools with re-configurable optimizers that can tackle a variety of problems in a domain requires even more domain and programming expertise. We present OPTIMISM, a toolkit which enables programmers and domain experts to collaboratively implement an optimization component of design tools. OPTIMISM supports the implementation of metaheuristic optimization methods by factoring them into easy to implement and reuse components: objectives that measure desirable qualities in the domain, modifiers which make useful changes to designs, design and modifier selectors which determine how the optimizer steps through the search space, and stopping criteria that determine when to return results. Implementing optimizers with OPTIMISM shifts the burden of domain expertise from programmers to domain experts.
Megan Hofmann, Nayha Auradkar, Jessica Birchfield, Jerry Cao, Autumn G. Hughes, Gene S.-H. Kim, Shriya Kurpad, Kathryn J. Lum, Kelly Mack, Anisha Nilakantan, Margaret Ellen Seehorn, Emily Warnock, Jennifer Mankoff, Scott E. Hudson
CHI8
2022 Maptimizer: Using Optimization to Tailor Tactile Maps to Users Needs
abstract
Tactile maps can help people who are blind or have low-vision navigate and familiarize themselves with unfamiliar locations. Ideally, tactile maps can be customized to an individual’s unique needs and abilities because of their limited space for representation. We present Maptimizer, a tool that generates tactile maps based on users’ preferences and requirements. Maptimizer uses a two stage optimization process to pair representations with geographic information and tune those representations to present that information more clearly. In a small user study, Maptimizer helped participants more successfully and efficiently identify locations of interest in unknown areas. These results demonstrate the utility of optimization techniques and generative design in complex accessibility domains.
Megan Hofmann, Kelly Mack, Jessica Birchfield, Jerry Cao, Autumn G. Hughes, Shriya Kurpad, Kathryn J. Lum, Emily Warnock, Anat Caspi, Scott E. Hudson, Jennifer Mankoff
CHI7
2021 Stitching Together the Experiences of Disabled Knitters
abstract
Knitting is a popular craft that can be used to create customized fabric objects such as household items, clothing and toys. Additionally, many knitters find knitting to be a relaxing and calming exercise. Little is known about how disabled knitters use and benefit from knitting, and what accessibility solutions and challenges they create and encounter. We conducted interviews with 16 experienced, disabled knitters and analyzed 20 threads from six forums that discussed accessible knitting to identify how and why disabled knitters knit, and what accessibility concerns remain. We additionally conducted an iterative design case study developing knitting tools for a knitter who found existing solutions insufficient. Our innovations improved the range of stitches she could produce. We conclude by arguing for the importance of improving tools for both pattern generation and modification as well as adaptations or modifications to existing tools such as looms to make it easier to track progress
Taylor Gotfrid, Kelly Mack, Kathryn J. Lum, Evelyn Yang, Jessica K. Hodgins, Scott E. Hudson, Jennifer Mankoff
CHI3