Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Shushant Kumar

dblp:292/6621 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0000-6412-238XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 77% Data mining · 23%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining › text mining › information extraction
citation attribution
1.012026
What Gets Cited: Competitive GEO in AI Answer Engines · SIGIR 2026
Information retrieval
generative engine optimization
1.012026
What Gets Cited: Competitive GEO in AI Answer Engines · SIGIR 2026
Information retrieval › user behavior › search behavior › click model
position bias
1.012026
What Gets Cited: Competitive GEO in AI Answer Engines · SIGIR 2026
Information retrieval
retrieval-augmented generation
1.012026
What Gets Cited: Competitive GEO in AI Answer Engines · SIGIR 2026
Information retrieval › ranking › result ranking
search result ranking
0.312026
What Gets Cited: Competitive GEO in AI Answer Engines · SIGIR 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

mixed-effects model · 1.0factorial experiment · 1.0counterbalanced design · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 What Gets Cited: Competitive GEO in AI Answer Engines
abstract
AI answer engines generate answers from retrieved pages but cite only a few sources. This makes visibility depend not just on ranking, but on being cited. We study competitive Generative Engine Optimization (GEO): when two retrieved candidates compete, what makes one more likely to be cited first? We build a controlled two-document retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) testbed that injects exactly two candidate sources into the model context and measures which source is referenced by the first citation marker in the output. Across six LLMs we execute 252,000 trials, repeated paired comparisons under one factorial program over 18 content factors. In each trial the two sources differ in exactly one factor; we use brand anonymization and counterbalanced source order to separate content effects from position bias. Mixed-effects models show that topical relevance and list position are the biggest drivers of being cited first. Including explicit price information and a recent timestamp also helps consistently. Completeness and trust cues add smaller gains, while formatting-only edits have little impact. We release a reproducible evaluation protocol and a prioritized GEO checklist for practitioners, and we exercised it in an early internal pilot at Sprinklr, where teams reported positive qualitative feedback on workflow usability.
Shushant Kumar, Ratnesh Jamidar
SIGIR2
2021 Multi-Res-Attention UNet: A CNN Model for the Segmentation of Focal Cortical Dysplasia Lesions from Magnetic Resonance Images
abstract
In this work, we have focused on the segmentation of Focal Cortical Dysplasia (FCD) regions from MRI images. FCD is a congenital malformation of brain development that is considered as the most common causative of intractable epilepsy in adults and children. To our knowledge, the latest work concerning the automatic segmentation of FCD was proposed using a fully convolutional neural network (FCN) model based on UNet. While there is no doubt that the model outperformed conventional image processing techniques by a considerable margin, it suffers from several pitfalls. First, it does not account for the large semantic gap of feature maps passed from the encoder to the decoder layer through the long skip connections. Second, it fails to leverage the salient features that represent complex FCD lesions and suppress most of the irrelevant features in the input sample. We propose Multi-Res-Attention UNet; a novel hybrid skip connection-based FCN architecture that addresses these drawbacks. Moreover, we have trained it from scratch for the detection of FCD from 3 T MRI 3D FLAIR images and conducted 5-fold cross-validation to evaluate the model. FCD detection rate (Recall) of 92% was achieved for patient wise analysis.
Edwin Thomas, S. J. Pawan, Shushant Kumar, Anmol Horo, S. Niyas, S. Vinayagamani, Chandrasekharan Kesavadas, Jeny Rajan
IEEE J. Biomed. Health Informatics3