Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Junlong Lian

dblp:292/7115 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0007-3167-1236ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithms and data structures · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software testing › random testing
adaptive random testing
0.812024
Toward Cost-Effective Adaptive Random Testing: An Approximate Nearest Neighbor Approach · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2024
Software testing
random testing
0.812024
Toward Cost-Effective Adaptive Random Testing: An Approximate Nearest Neighbor Approach · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2024
Software testing
test generation
0.812024
Toward Cost-Effective Adaptive Random Testing: An Approximate Nearest Neighbor Approach · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2024
Algorithms and data structures › similarity search › nearest neighbor search
approximate nearest neighbor search
0.212024
Toward Cost-Effective Adaptive Random Testing: An Approximate Nearest Neighbor Approach · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2024
Algorithms and data structures › similarity search
nearest neighbor search
0.212024
Toward Cost-Effective Adaptive Random Testing: An Approximate Nearest Neighbor Approach · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

locality-sensitive hashing · 1.5approximate nearest neighbor · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Toward Cost-Effective Adaptive Random Testing: An Approximate Nearest Neighbor Approach
abstract
Adaptive Random Testing(ART) enhances the testing effectiveness (including fault-detection capability) ofRandom Testing(RT) by increasing the diversity of the random test cases throughout the input domain. Many ART algorithms have been investigated such asFixed-Size-Candidate-Set ART(FSCS) andRestricted Random Testing(RRT), and have been widely used in many practical applications. Despite its popularity, ART suffers from the problem of high computational costs during test-case generation, especially as the number of test cases increases. Although several strategies have been proposed to enhance the ART testing efficiency, such as theforgetting strategyand thek-dimensional tree strategy, these algorithms still face some challenges, including: (1) Although these algorithms can reduce the computation time, their execution costs are still very high, especially when the number of test cases is large; and (2) To achieve low computational costs, they may sacrifice some fault-detection capability. In this paper, we propose an approach based onApproximate Nearest Neighbors(ANNs), calledLocality-Sensitive Hashing ART(LSH-ART). When calculating distances among different test inputs, LSH-ART identifies the approximate (not necessarily exact) nearest neighbors for candidates in an efficient way. LSH-ART attempts to balance ART testing effectiveness and efficiency.
Rubing Huang, Chenhui Cui, Junlong Lian, Dave Towey, Weifeng Sun 0004, Haibo Chen 0005
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.3
2023 VPP-ART: An Efficient Implementation of Fixed-Size-Candidate-Set Adaptive Random Testing Using Vantage Point Partitioning
abstract
Adaptive random testing(ART) is an enhancement ofrandom testing(RT), and aims to improve the RT failure-detection effectiveness by distributing test cases more evenly in the input domain. Many ART algorithms have been proposed, withfixed-size-candidate-setART (FSCS-ART) being one of the most effective and popular. FSCS-ART ensures high failure-detection effectiveness by selecting as the next test case the candidate farthest from previously executed test cases. Although FSCS-ART has good failure-detection effectiveness, it also faces some challenges, including heavy computational overheads. In this article, we propose an enhanced version of FSCS-ART,vantage point partitioning ART(VPP-ART). VPP-ART addresses the FSCS-ART computational overhead problem using VPP, while maintaining the failure-detection effectiveness. VPP-ART partitions the input domain space using amodified vantage point tree(VP-tree) and finds the approximate nearest executed test cases of a candidate test case in the partitioned subdomains—thereby significantly reducing the time overheads compared with the searches required for FSCS-ART. To enable the FSCS-ART dynamic insertion process, we modify the traditional VP-tree to support dynamic data. The simulation results show that VPP-ART has a much lower time overhead compared to FSCS-ART, but also delivers similar (or better) failure-detection effectiveness, especially in the higher dimensional input domains. According to statistical analyses, VPP-ART can improve on the FSCS-ART failure-detection effectiveness by approximately 50–58%. VPP-ART also compares favorably with theKD-tree-enhanced fixed-size-candidate-set ART(KDFC-ART) algorithms (a series of enhanced ART algorithms based on the KD-tree). Our experiments also show that VPP-ART is more cost-effective than FSCS-ART and KDFC-ART.
Rubing Huang, Chenhui Cui, Dave Towey, Weifeng Sun 0004, Junlong Lian
IEEE Trans. Reliab.5