Block-structured integer linear programs (ILPs) play an important role in various application fields. We address n-fold ILPs where the matrix 𝒜 has a specific structure, i.e., where the blocks in the lower part of 𝒜 consist only of the row vectors (1,… ,1). In this paper, we propose an approach tailored to exactly these combinatorial n-folds. We utilize a divide and conquer approach to separate the original problem such that the right-hand side iteratively decreases in size. We show that this decrease in size can be calculated such that we only need to consider a bounded amount of possible right-hand sides. This, in turn, lets us efficiently combine solutions of the smaller right-hand sides to solve the original problem. We can decide the feasibility of, and also optimally solve, such problems in time (n r Δ)^O(r) log(‖b‖_∞), where n is the number of blocks, r the number of rows in the upper blocks and Δ = ‖A‖_∞. We complement the algorithm by discussing applications of the n-fold ILPs with the specific structure we require. We consider the problems of (i) scheduling on uniform machines, (ii) closest string and (iii) (graph) imbalance. Regarding (i), our algorithm results in running times of p_max^O(d)|I|^O(1), matching a lower bound derived via ETH. For (ii) we achieve running times matching the current state-of-the-art in the general case. In contrast to the state-of-the-art, our result can leverage a bounded number of column-types to yield an improved running time. For (iii), we improve the parameter dependency on the size of the vertex cover.

We settle the pseudo-polynomial complexity of the Demand Strip Packing (DSP) problem: Given a strip of fixed width and a set of items with widths and heights, the items must be placed inside the strip with the objective of minimizing the peak height. This problem has gained significant scientific interest due to its relevance in smart grids~[Deppert~et~al. APPROX'21, Gálvez~et~al. APPROX'21]. Smart Grids are a modern form of electrical grid that provide opportunities for optimization. They are forecast to impact the future of energy provision significantly. Algorithms running in pseudo-polynomial time lend themselves to these applications as considered time intervals, such as days, are small. Moreover, such algorithms can provide superior approximation guarantees over those running in polynomial time. Consequently, they evoke scientific interest in related problems~[Jansen and Rau ESA'19]. We prove that Demand Strip Packing is strongly NP-hard for approximation ratios below~5/4. Through this proof, we provide novel insights into the relation of packing and scheduling problems. Using these insights, we show a series of frameworks that solve both Demand Strip Packing and Parallel Task Scheduling optimally when increasing the strip's width or number of machines. Such alterations to problems are known as resource augmentation. Applications are found when penalty costs are prohibitively large. Finally, we provide a pseudo-polynomial time approximation algorithm for DSP with an approximation ratio of (5/4+ε), which is nearly optimal assuming P≠neq NP. The construction of this algorithm provides several insights into the structure of DSP solutions and uses novel techniques to restructure optimal solutions.

We present a fast and efficient 3/2 dual approximation algorithm for CPU/GPU scheduling under the objective of makespan minimization. In CPU/GPU scheduling tasks can be scheduled on two different architectures. When executed on the CPU, a task is moldable and can be assigned to multiple cores. The running time becomes a function in the assigned cores. On a GPU, the task is a classical job with a set processing time. Both settings have drawn recent independent scientific interest. For the moldable CPU scheduling, the current best known constant rate approximation is a 3/2 approximation algorithm [Wu et al. EJOR volume 306]. The best efficient algorithm for this setting is a 3/2+ε approximation [Mounie et al. SIAM '07] whereas GPU scheduling admits a 13/11 approximation [Coffman, Garey, Johnson SIAM'78]. We improve upon the current best known algorithms for CPU/GPU scheduling by Bleuse et al. by formulating a novel multidimensional multiple choice knapsack to allot tasks to either architecture and schedule them there with known algorithms. This yields an improved running time over the current state of the art. We complement our theoretical results with experimentation that shows a significant speedup by using practical optimizations and explore their efficacy.

Abstract We study the Non-preemptive Peak Demand Minimization (NPDM) problem, where we are given a set of jobs, specified by their processing times and energy requirements. The goal is to schedule all jobs within a fixed time period such that the peak load (the maximum total energy requirement at any time) is minimized. This problem has recently received significant attention due to its relevance in smart-grids. Theoretically, the problem is related to the classical strip packing problem (SP). In SP, a given set of axis-aligned rectangles must be packed into a fixed-width strip, such that the height of the strip is minimized. NPDM can be modeled as strip packing with slicing and stacking constraint: each rectangle may be cut vertically into multiple slices and the slices may be packed into the strip as individual pieces. The stacking constraint forbids solutions where two slices of the same rectangle are intersected by the same vertical line. Non-preemption enforces the slices to be placed in contiguous horizontal locations (but may be placed at different vertical locations). We obtain a $$(5/3+\varepsilon )$$ (5/3+ε) -approximation algorithm for the problem. We also provide an asymptotic efficient polynomial-time approximation scheme (AEPTAS) which generates a schedule for almost all jobs with energy consumption $$(1+\varepsilon ) {\textrm{OPT}}$$ (1+ε)OPT . The remaining jobs fit into a thin container of height 1. This AEPTAS is used as a subroutine to acquire the $$(5/3+\varepsilon )$$ (5/3+ε) -approximation algorithm. The previous best result for NPDM was a 2.7-approximation based on FFDH (Ranjan et al., in: 2015 IEEE symposium on computers and communication (ISCC), pp 758–763, IEEE, 2015). One of our key ideas is providing several new lower bounds on the optimal solution of a geometric packing, which could be useful in other related problems. These lower bounds help us to obtain approximative solutions based on Steinberg’s algorithm in many cases. In addition, we show how to split schedules generated by the AEPTAS into few segments and to rearrange the corresponding jobs to insert the thin container mentioned above, such that it does not exceed the bound of $$(5/3+\varepsilon ) {\textrm{OPT}}$$ (5/3+ε)OPT .

We study the Nonpreemptive Peak Demand Minimization (NPDM) problem, where we are given a set of jobs, specified by their processing times and energy requirements. The goal is to schedule all jobs within a fixed time period such that the peak load (the maximum total energy requirement at any time) is minimized. This problem has recently received significant attention due to its relevance in smart-grids. Theoretically, the problem is related to the classical strip packing problem (SP). In SP, a given set of axis-aligned rectangles must be packed into a fixed-width strip, such that the height of the strip is minimized. NPDM can be modeled as strip packing with slicing and stacking constraint: each rectangle may be cut vertically into multiple slices and the slices may be packed into the strip as individual pieces. The stacking constraint forbids solutions where two slices of the same rectangle are intersected by the same vertical line. Nonpreemption enforces the slices to be placed in contiguous horizontal locations (but may be placed at different vertical locations). We obtain a (5/3+ε)-approximation algorithm for the problem. We also provide an asymptotic efficient polynomial-time approximation scheme (AEPTAS) which generates a schedule for almost all jobs with energy consumption (1+ε) OPT. The remaining jobs fit into a thin container of height 1. The previous best result for NPDM was a 2.7 approximation based on FFDH [Ranjan et al., 2015]. One of our key ideas is providing several new lower bounds on the optimal solution of a geometric packing, which could be useful in other related problems. These lower bounds help us to obtain approximative solutions based on Steinberg’s algorithm in many cases. In addition, we show how to split schedules generated by the AEPTAS into few segments and to rearrange the corresponding jobs to insert the thin container mentioned above.