EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Dhruba Ghosh
dblp:292/8318
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
5since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-8518-2696ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Vision and language · 26% Generative modeling · 16% Efficient and distributed learning · 16% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
text-to-image generation |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Getting it Right: Improving Spatial Consistency in Text-to-Image Models · ECCV (22) 2024 GenEval: An object-focused framework for evaluating text-to-image alignment · NeurIPS 2023 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Why are Visually-Grounded Language Models Bad at Image Classification? · NeurIPS 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training
language model pretraining |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | DataComp-LM: In search of the next generation of training sets for language models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
spatial consistency |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Getting it Right: Improving Spatial Consistency in Text-to-Image Models · ECCV (22) 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › data curation
training data curation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | DataComp-LM: In search of the next generation of training sets for language models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Why are Visually-Grounded Language Models Bad at Image Classification? · NeurIPS 2024 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › multimodal evaluation
compositional generation evaluation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | GenEval: An object-focused framework for evaluating text-to-image alignment · NeurIPS 2023 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › cross-modal alignment › image-text alignment
text-to-image alignment |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | GenEval: An object-focused framework for evaluating text-to-image alignment · NeurIPS 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training
data mixing |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | DataComp-LM: In search of the next generation of training sets for language models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Why are Visually-Grounded Language Models Bad at Image Classification? · NeurIPS 2024 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | GenEval: An object-focused framework for evaluating text-to-image alignment · NeurIPS 2023 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language pretraining |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | DataComp: In search of the next generation of multimodal datasets · NeurIPS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
model-based filtering · 0.8instruction tuning · 0.8diffusion model · 0.8deduplication · 0.8CLIP · 0.8object detection · 0.7discriminative vision models · 0.7data filtering · 0.7CLIP training · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Getting it Right: Improving Spatial Consistency in Text-to-Image Models
Agneet Chatterjee, Gabriela Ben Melech Stan, Estelle Aflalo, Sayak Paul, Dhruba Ghosh, Tejas Gokhale, Ludwig Schmidt, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, Vasudev Lal, Chitta Baral, Yezhou Yang |
ECCV (22) | 5 |
| 2024 | DataComp-LM: In search of the next generation of training sets for language modelsabstractWe introduce DataComp for Language Models, a testbed for controlled dataset experiments with the goal of improving language models.As part of DCLM, we provide a standardized corpus of 240T tokens extracted from Common Crawl, effective pretraining recipes based on the OpenLM framework, and a broad suite of 53 downstream evaluations.Participants in the DCLM benchmark can experiment with data curation strategies such as deduplication, filtering, and data mixing atmodel scales ranging from 412M to 7B parameters.As a baseline for DCLM, we conduct extensive experiments and find that model-based filtering is key to assembling a high-quality training set.The resulting dataset, DCLM-Baseline, enables training a 7B parameter language model from scratch to 63% 5-shot accuracy on MMLU with 2T training tokens.Compared to MAP-Neo, the previous state-of-the-art in open-data language models, DCLM-Baseline represents a 6 percentage point improvement on MMLU while being trained with half the compute.Our results highlight the importance of dataset design for training language models and offer a starting point for further research on data curation. We release the \dclm benchmark, framework, models, and datasets at https://www.datacomp.ai/dclm/ Jeffrey Li, Alex Fang, Georgios Smyrnis, Maor Ivgi, Matt Jordan, Samir Yitzhak Gadre, Hritik Bansal, Etash Kumar Guha, Sedrick Keh, Kushal Arora, Niklas Muennighoff, Reinhard Heckel, Jean Mercat, Mayee F. Chen, Suchin Gururangan, Mitchell Wortsman, Alon Albalak, Yonatan Bitton, Marianna Nezhurina, Amro Abbas, Cheng-Yu Hsieh, Dhruba Ghosh, Josh Gardner 0001, Maciej Kilian, Hanlin Zhang 0002, Rulin Shao, Sarah M. Pratt, Sunny Sanyal, Gabriel Ilharco, Giannis Daras, Kalyani Marathe, Aaron Gokaslan, Jieyu Zhang 0001, Khyathi Raghavi Chandu, Igor Vasiljevic, Sham M. Kakade, Shuran Song, Sujay Sanghavi, Fartash Faghri, Sewoong Oh, Luke Zettlemoyer, Kyle Lo, Alaaeldin El-Nouby, Hadi Pouransari, Alexander Toshev, Stephanie Wang, Dirk Groeneveld, Luca Soldaini, Pang Wei Koh, Jenia Jitsev, Thomas Kollar, Alexandros G. Dimakis, Yair Carmon, Achal Dave, Ludwig Schmidt, Vaishaal Shankar |
NeurIPS | 24 |
| 2024 | Why are Visually-Grounded Language Models Bad at Image Classification?abstractImage classification is one of the most fundamental capabilities of machine vision intelligence. In this work, we revisit the image classification task using visually-grounded language models (VLMs) such as GPT-4V and LLaVA. We find that existing proprietary and public VLMs, despite often using CLIP as a vision encoder and having many more parameters, significantly underperform CLIP on standard image classification benchmarks like ImageNet. To understand the reason, we explore several hypotheses concerning the inference algorithms, training objectives, and data processing in VLMs. Our analysis reveals that the primary cause is data-related: critical information for image classification is encoded in the VLM's latent space but can only be effectively decoded with enough training data. Specifically, there is a strong correlation between the frequency of class exposure during VLM training and instruction-tuning and the VLM's performance in those classes; when trained with sufficient data, VLMs can match the accuracy of state-of-the-art classification models. Based on these findings, we enhance a VLM by integrating classification-focused datasets into its training, and demonstrate that the enhanced classification performance of the VLM transfers to its general capabilities, resulting in an improvement of 11.8% on the newly collected ImageWikiQA dataset. Alyssa Unell, Dhruba Ghosh, Yuchang Su, Ludwig Schmidt, Serena Yeung-Levy |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2023 | DataComp: In search of the next generation of multimodal datasetsabstractMultimodal datasets are a critical component in recent breakthroughs such as CLIP, Stable Diffusion and GPT-4, yet their design does not receive the same research attention as model architectures or training algorithms. To address this shortcoming in the machine learning ecosystem, we introduce DataComp, a testbed for dataset experiments centered around a new candidate pool of 12.8 billion image-text pairs from Common Crawl. Participants in our benchmark design new filtering techniques or curate new data sources and then evaluate their new dataset by running our standardized CLIP training code and testing the resulting model on 38 downstream test sets. Our benchmark consists of multiple compute scales spanning four orders of magnitude, which enables the study of scaling trends and makes the benchmark accessible to researchers with varying resources. Our baseline experiments show that the DataComp workflow leads to better training sets. Our best baseline, DataComp-1B, enables training a CLIP ViT-L/14 from scratch to 79.2% zero-shot accuracy on ImageNet, outperforming OpenAI's CLIP ViT-L/14 by 3.7 percentage points while using the same training procedure and compute. We release \datanet and all accompanying code at www.datacomp.ai. Samir Yitzhak Gadre, Gabriel Ilharco, Alex Fang, Jonathan Hayase, Georgios Smyrnis, Ryan Marten, Mitchell Wortsman, Dhruba Ghosh, Jieyu Zhang 0001, Eyal Orgad, Rahim Entezari, Giannis Daras, Sarah M. Pratt, Vivek Ramanujan, Yonatan Bitton, Kalyani Marathe, Stephen Mussmann, Richard Vencu, Mehdi Cherti, Ranjay Krishna, Pang Wei Koh, Olga Saukh, Alexander Ratner, Shuran Song, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, Ali Farhadi, Romain Beaumont, Sewoong Oh, Alexandros G. Dimakis, Jenia Jitsev, Yair Carmon, Vaishaal Shankar, Ludwig Schmidt |
NeurIPS | 9 |
| 2023 | GenEval: An object-focused framework for evaluating text-to-image alignmentabstractRecent breakthroughs in diffusion models, multimodal pretraining, and efficient finetuning have led to an explosion of text-to-image generative models. Given human evaluation is expensive and difficult to scale, automated methods are critical for evaluating the increasingly large number of new models. However, most current automated evaluation metrics like FID or CLIPScore only offer a distribution-level measure of image quality or image-text alignment, and are unsuited for fine-grained or instance-level analysis. In this paper, we introduce GenEval, an object-focused framework to evaluate compositional image properties such as object co-occurrence, position, count, and color. We show that current object detection models can be leveraged to evaluate text-to-image models on a variety of generation tasks with strong human agreement, and that other discriminative vision models can be linked to this pipeline to further verify properties like object color. We then evaluate several open-source text-to-image models and analyze their relative reasoning capabilities on our benchmark. We find that recent models demonstrate significant improvement on these tasks, though they are still lacking in complex capabilities such as spatial relations and attribute binding. Finally, we demonstrate how GenEval might be used to help discover existing failure modes, in order to inform development of the next generation of text-to-image models. Our code to run the GenEval framework will be made publicly available at https://github.com/djghosh13/geneval. Dhruba Ghosh, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, Ludwig Schmidt |
NeurIPS | 1 |