Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Amy M. Mason
dblp:292/9277
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 67% Computational social science and digital humanities · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational social science and digital humanities › causal inference
causal effect estimation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | MR-Clust: clustering of genetic variants in Mendelian randomization with similar causal estimates · Bioinform. 2021 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics › genetic study design
mendelian randomization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | MR-Clust: clustering of genetic variants in Mendelian randomization with similar causal estimates · Bioinform. 2021 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
statistical genetics |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | MR-Clust: clustering of genetic variants in Mendelian randomization with similar causal estimates · Bioinform. 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
clustering · 0.5bayesian inference · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | MR-Clust: clustering of genetic variants in Mendelian randomization with similar causal estimatesabstractMOTIVATION: Mendelian randomization is an epidemiological technique that uses genetic variants as instrumental variables to estimate the causal effect of a risk factor on an outcome. We consider a scenario in which causal estimates based on each variant in turn differ more strongly than expected by chance alone, but the variants can be divided into distinct clusters, such that all variants in the cluster have similar causal estimates. This scenario is likely to occur when there are several distinct causal mechanisms by which a risk factor influences an outcome with different magnitudes of causal effect. We have developed an algorithm MR-Clust that finds such clusters of variants, and so can identify variants that reflect distinct causal mechanisms. Two features of our clustering algorithm are that it accounts for differential uncertainty in the causal estimates, and it includes 'null' and 'junk' clusters, to provide protection against the detection of spurious clusters. RESULTS: Our algorithm correctly detected the number of clusters in a simulation analysis, outperforming methods that either do not account for uncertainty or do not include null and junk clusters. In an applied example considering the effect of blood pressure on coronary artery disease risk, the method detected four clusters of genetic variants. A post hoc hypothesis-generating search suggested that variants in the cluster with a negative effect of blood pressure on coronary artery disease risk were more strongly related to trunk fat percentage and other adiposity measures than variants not in this cluster. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: MR-Clust can be downloaded from https://github.com/cnfoley/mrclust. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Christopher N. Foley, Amy M. Mason, Paul D. W. Kirk, Stephen Burgess |
Bioinform. | 2 |