Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ruoyi Cai
dblp:292/9943
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 67% Computational science and engineering · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational science and engineering
model selection |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Assessing the fit of the multi-species network coalescent to multi-locus data · Bioinform. 2021 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
phylogenetics |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Assessing the fit of the multi-species network coalescent to multi-locus data · Bioinform. 2021 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › phylogenetics › phylogenetic network
phylogenetic network inference |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Assessing the fit of the multi-species network coalescent to multi-locus data · Bioinform. 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multi-species coalescent · 0.5goodness-of-fit test · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Assessing the fit of the multi-species network coalescent to multi-locus dataabstractMOTIVATION: With growing genome-wide molecular datasets from next-generation sequencing, phylogenetic networks can be estimated using a variety of approaches. These phylogenetic networks include events like hybridization, gene flow or horizontal gene transfer explicitly. However, the most accurate network inference methods are computationally heavy. Methods that scale to larger datasets do not calculate a full likelihood, such that traditional likelihood-based tools for model selection are not applicable to decide how many past hybridization events best fit the data. We propose here a goodness-of-fit test to quantify the fit between data observed from genome-wide multi-locus data, and patterns expected under the multi-species coalescent model on a candidate phylogenetic network. RESULTS: We identified weaknesses in the previously proposed TICR test, and proposed corrections. The performance of our new test was validated by simulations on real-world phylogenetic networks. Our test provides one of the first rigorous tools for model selection, to select the adequate network complexity for the data at hand. The test can also work for identifying poorly inferred areas on a network. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Software for the goodness-of-fit test is available as a Julia package at https://github.com/cecileane/QuartetNetworkGoodnessFit.jl. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Ruoyi Cai, Cécile Ané |
Bioinform. | 1 |