EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Soumyadeep Thakur
dblp:293/1035
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 50% Deep learning architectures and training · 50% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization
gradient regularization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Training for the Future: A Simple Gradient Interpolation Loss to Generalize Along Time · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain generalization
temporal domain generalization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Training for the Future: A Simple Gradient Interpolation Loss to Generalize Along Time · NeurIPS 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
gradient interpolation loss · 0.5adversarial learning · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Training for the Future: A Simple Gradient Interpolation Loss to Generalize Along TimeabstractIn several real world applications, machine learning models are deployed to make predictions on data whose distribution changes gradually along time, leading to a drift between the train and test distributions. Such models are often re-trained on new data periodically, and they hence need to generalize to data not too far into the future. In this context, there is much prior work on enhancing temporal generalization, e.g. continuous transportation of past data, kernel smoothed time-sensitive parameters and more recently, adversarial learning of time-invariant features. However, these methods share several limitations, e.g, poor scalability, training instability, and dependence on unlabeled data from the future. Responding to the above limitations, we propose a simple method that starts with a model with time-sensitive parameters but regularizes its temporal complexity using a Gradient Interpolation (GI) loss. GI allows the decision boundary to change along time and can still prevent overfitting to the limited training time snapshots by allowing task-specific control over changes along time. We compare our method to existing baselines on multiple real-world datasets, which show that GI outperforms more complicated generative and adversarial approaches on the one hand, and simpler gradient regularization methods on the other. Anshul Nasery, Soumyadeep Thakur, Vihari Piratla, Abir De, Sunita Sarawagi |
NeurIPS | 2 |