Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jiaxun Ye

dblp:293/4149 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Efficient and distributed learning · 93% Trustworthy machine learning · 7%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › pruning
dynamic pruning
0.912025
FedRTS: Federated Robust Pruning via Combinatorial Thompson Sampling · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning
0.912025
FedRTS: Federated Robust Pruning via Combinatorial Thompson Sampling · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning
federated pruning
0.912025
FedRTS: Federated Robust Pruning via Combinatorial Thompson Sampling · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
0.912025
FedRTS: Federated Robust Pruning via Combinatorial Thompson Sampling · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
robustness to data heterogeneity
0.312025
FedRTS: Federated Robust Pruning via Combinatorial Thompson Sampling · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

thompson sampling-based adjustment · 0.9combinatorial thompson sampling · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 FedRTS: Federated Robust Pruning via Combinatorial Thompson Sampling
abstract
Federated Learning (FL) enables collaborative model training across distributed clients without data sharing, but its high computational and communication demands strain resource-constrained devices. While existing methods use dynamic pruning to improve efficiency by periodically adjusting sparse model topologies while maintaining sparsity, these approaches suffer from issues such as **greedy adjustments**, **unstable topologies**, and **communication inefficiency**, resulting in less robust models and suboptimal performance under data heterogeneity and partial client availability. To address these challenges, we propose **Fed**erated **R**obust pruning via combinatorial **T**hompson **S**ampling (FedRTS),a novel framework designed to develop robust sparse models. FedRTS enhances robustness and performance through its Thompson Sampling-based Adjustment (TSAdj) mechanism, which uses probabilistic decisions informed by stable and farsighted information, instead of deterministic decisions reliant on unstable and myopic information in previous methods. Extensive experiments demonstrate that FedRTS achieves state-of-the-art performance in computer vision and natural language processing tasks while reducing communication costs, particularly excelling in scenarios with heterogeneous data distributions and partial client participation. Our codes are available at: https://github.com/Little0o0/FedRTS.
Hong Huang 0005, Jinhai Yang 0006, Jiaxun Ye, Dapeng Oliver Wu
NeurIPS4