Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Maximilian Reimer

dblp:293/6876 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Optimization for machine learning · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › hyperparameter optimization
dynamic algorithm configuration
0.512021
DACBench: A Benchmark Library for Dynamic Algorithm Configuration · IJCAI 2021
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
hyperparameter optimization
0.512021
DACBench: A Benchmark Library for Dynamic Algorithm Configuration · IJCAI 2021
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking
0.512021
DACBench: A Benchmark Library for Dynamic Algorithm Configuration · IJCAI 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

dynamic algorithm configuration · 1.0benchmarking · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 DACBench: A Benchmark Library for Dynamic Algorithm Configuration
abstract
Dynamic Algorithm Configuration (DAC) aims to dynamically control a target algorithm's hyperparameters in order to improve its performance. Several theoretical and empirical results have demonstrated the benefits of dynamically controlling hyperparameters in domains like evolutionary computation, AI Planning or deep learning. Replicating these results, as well as studying new methods for DAC, however, is difficult since existing benchmarks are often specialized and incompatible with the same interfaces. To facilitate benchmarking and thus research on DAC, we propose DACBench, a benchmark library that seeks to collect and standardize existing DAC benchmarks from different AI domains, as well as provide a template for new ones. For the design of DACBench, we focused on important desiderata, such as (i) flexibility, (ii) reproducibility, (iii) extensibility and (iv) automatic documentation and visualization. To show the potential, broad applicability and challenges of DAC, we explore how a set of six initial benchmarks compare in several dimensions of difficulty.
Theresa Eimer, André Biedenkapp, Maximilian Reimer, Steven Adriaensen, Frank Hutter, Marius Lindauer
IJCAI3