Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Maximilian Reimer
dblp:293/6876
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Optimization for machine learning · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › hyperparameter optimization
dynamic algorithm configuration |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | DACBench: A Benchmark Library for Dynamic Algorithm Configuration · IJCAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
hyperparameter optimization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | DACBench: A Benchmark Library for Dynamic Algorithm Configuration · IJCAI 2021 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | DACBench: A Benchmark Library for Dynamic Algorithm Configuration · IJCAI 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
dynamic algorithm configuration · 1.0benchmarking · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | DACBench: A Benchmark Library for Dynamic Algorithm ConfigurationabstractDynamic Algorithm Configuration (DAC) aims to dynamically control a target algorithm's hyperparameters in order to improve its performance. Several theoretical and empirical results have demonstrated the benefits of dynamically controlling hyperparameters in domains like evolutionary computation, AI Planning or deep learning. Replicating these results, as well as studying new methods for DAC, however, is difficult since existing benchmarks are often specialized and incompatible with the same interfaces. To facilitate benchmarking and thus research on DAC, we propose DACBench, a benchmark library that seeks to collect and standardize existing DAC benchmarks from different AI domains, as well as provide a template for new ones. For the design of DACBench, we focused on important desiderata, such as (i) flexibility, (ii) reproducibility, (iii) extensibility and (iv) automatic documentation and visualization. To show the potential, broad applicability and challenges of DAC, we explore how a set of six initial benchmarks compare in several dimensions of difficulty. Theresa Eimer, André Biedenkapp, Maximilian Reimer, Steven Adriaensen, Frank Hutter, Marius Lindauer |
IJCAI | 3 |