International audience

A MICRO 2024 best paper runner-up publication (the Mess paper [1]) with all three artifact badges awarded (including “Reproducible”) proposes a new benchmark to evaluate real and simulated memory system performance. The publication contends that Ramulator 2.0 [2] and DAMOV [3] (ZSim+Ramulator) (along with other existing memory system simulators) “poorly resemble the actual system performance” and asserts that their simulator is better.In this paper, we show that the Mess paper [1] has 1) demonstrable technical misconfigurations, 2) methodological errors in interpreting simulation statistics, and 3) an incomplete artifact that makes its key results irreproducible. We demonstrate that the Ramulator 2.0 simulation results reported in [1] are incorrect due to multiple configuration errors instead of inherent simulation inaccuracy claimed by the Mess paper. We show that by correctly configuring Ramulator 2.0, Ramulator 2.0’s simulated memory system performance actually resembles real system characteristics well, and thus a key claimed contribution of [1] is factually incorrect. We also identify that the DAMOV simulation results in [1] use wrong simulation statistics that are unrelated to the simulated DRAM performance. By using correct DRAM simulation statistics, we show that DAMOV’s simulated DRAM latency is not constant, in contrast to [1]’s claim. Moreover, the Mess paper’s artifact repository [4, 5] lacks the necessary sources (simulator code, system configurations, memory traces, etc.) to fully reproduce all the Mess paper’s results. We find that the experiment scripts in [4, 5] use simulator executables and other resources that are neither described in the Mess paper nor found in the artifact repository [4, 5].Our work identifies important issues in [1]’s memory simulator evaluation methodology regarding Ramulator 2.0 and DAMOV. We present results that validate the real-system modeling accuracy of Ramulator 2.0, and describe the reasons why [1]’s results with respect to these two simulators are incorrect. We emphasize the importance of carefully and rigorously validating simulation results to avoid publishing factually incorrect results and contributions. We strongly encourage the computer architecture community to consider our corrections to the Ramulator 2.0 and DAMOV results of the Mess paper [1] to prevent the propagation of inaccurate and misleading results and to maintain the reliability of the scientific record. Our investigation also aims to stimulate discussion on artifact evaluation practices and on mechanisms for correcting results and artifacts after publication. To aid future works and reproduction of all our results, we open source all our code and scripts. We also discuss best practices and add sanity checks to aid users and developers of simulation tools.

The unprecedented growth in data demand from emerging applications has turned virtual memory (VM) into a major performance bottleneck. VM's overheads are expected to persist as memory requirements continue to increase. Researchers explore new hardware/OS co-designs to optimize VM across diverse applications and systems. To evaluate such designs, researchers rely on various simulation methodologies to model VM components. Unfortunately, current simulation tools (i) either lack the desired accuracy in modeling VM's software components or (ii) are too slow and complex to prototype and evaluate schemes that span across the hardware/software boundary.

We introduce IMPACT, a set of high-throughput main memory-based timing attacks that leverage characteristics of processing-in-memory (PiM) architectures to establish covert and side channels. IMPACT enables high-throughput communication and private information leakage by exploiting the shared DRAM row buffer. To achieve high throughput, IMPACT (i) eliminates expensive cache bypassing steps required by processor-centric memory-based timing attacks and (ii) leverages the intrinsic parallelism of PiM operations. We showcase two applications of IMPACT. First, we build two covert channels that leverage different PiM approaches (i.e., processing-near-memory and processing-using-memory) to establish high-throughput covert communication channels. Our covert channels achieve 8.2 Mb/s and 14.8 Mb/s communication throughput, respectively, which is 3.6 × and 6.5 × higher than the state-of-the-art main memory-based covert channel. Second, we showcase a side-channel attack that leaks private information of concurrently-running victim applications with a low error rate. Our source-code is openly and freely available at https://github.com/CMU-SAFARI/IMPACT.

Read disturbance in modern DRAM is an important robustness (security, safety, and reliability) problem, where repeatedly accessing (hammering) a row of DRAM cells (DRAM row) induces bitflips in other physically nearby DRAM rows. Shrinking technology node size exacerbates DRAM read disturbance over generations. To help mitigate read disturbance, the latest DDR5 specifications (as of April 2024) introduced a new RowHammer mitigation framework, called Per Row Activation Counting (PRAC). PRAC 1) enables the DRAM chip to accurately track row activations by allocating an activation counter per row and 2) provides the DRAM chip with the necessary time window to perform RowHammer-preventive refreshes by introducing a new back-off signal. Unfortunately, no prior work rigorously studies PRAC’s security guarantees and overheads. In this paper, we 1) present the first rigorous security, performance, energy, and cost analyses of PRAC and 2) propose Chronus, a new mechanism that addresses PRAC’s two major weaknesses. Our analysis shows that PRAC’s system performance overhead on benign applications is non-negligible for modern DRAM chips and prohibitively large for future DRAM chips that are more vulnerable to read disturbance. We identify two weaknesses of PRAC that cause these overheads. First, PRAC increases critical DRAM access latency parameters due to the additional time required to increment activation counters. Second, PRAC performs a constant number of preventive refreshes at a time, making it vulnerable to an adversarial access pattern, known as the wave attack, and consequently requiring it to be configured for significantly smaller activation thresholds. To address PRAC’s two weaknesses, we propose a new on-DRAM-die RowHammer mitigation mechanism, Chronus. Chronus 1) updates row activation counters concurrently while serving accesses by separating counters from the data and 2) prevents the wave attack by dynamically controlling the number of preventive refreshes performed. Our performance analysis shows that Chronus’s system performance overhead is near-zero for modern DRAM chips and very low for future DRAM chips. Chronus outperforms three variants of PRAC and three other state-of-the-art read disturbance solutions. We discuss Chronus’s and PRAC’s implications for future systems and foreshadow future research directions. To aid future research, we open-source our Chronus implementation at https://github.com/CMU-SAFARI/Chronus.

Modern DRAM chips are subject to read disturbance errors. These errors manifest as security-critical bitflips in a victim DRAM row that is physically nearby a repeatedly activated (opened) aggressor row (RowHammer) or an aggressor row that is kept open for a long time (RowPress). State-of-the-art read disturbance mitigations rely on accurate and exhaustive characterization of the read disturbance threshold ($R D T$) (e.g., the number of aggressor row activations needed to induce the first RowHammer or RowPress bitflip) of every DRAM row (of which there are millions or billions in a modern system) to prevent read disturbance bitflips securely and with low overhead. We experimentally demonstrate for the first time that the RDT of a DRAM row significantly and unpredictably changes over time. We call this new phenomenon variable read disturbance (VRD). Our extensive experiments using 160 DDR4 chips and 4 HBM2 chips from three major manufacturers yield three key observations. First, it is very unlikely that relatively few RDT measurements can accurately identify the RDT of a DRAM row. The minimum RDT of a DRAM row appears after tens of thousands of measurements (e.g., up to 94,467), and the minimum RDT of a DRAM row is $3.5 \times$ smaller than the maximum RDT observed for that row. Second, the probability of accurately identifying a row’s RDT with a relatively small number of measurements reduces with increasing chip density or smaller technology node size. Third, data pattern, the amount of time an aggressor row is kept open, and temperature can affect the probability of accurately identifying a DRAM row’s RDT. Our empirical results have implications for the security guarantees of read disturbance mitigation techniques: if the RDT of a DRAM row is not identified accurately, these techniques can easily become insecure. We discuss and evaluate using a guardband for RDT and error-correcting codes for mitigating read disturbance bitflips in the presence of RDTs that change unpredictably over time. We conclude that $a\gt 10 \%$ guardband for the minimum observed RDT combined with SECDED or Chipkill-like SSC error-correcting codes could prevent read disturbance bitflips at the cost of large read disturbance mitigation performance overheads (e.g., 45% performance loss for an RDT guardband of $50 \%$). We hope and believe future work on efficient online profiling mechanisms and configurable read disturbance mitigation techniques could remedy the challenges imposed on today’s read disturbance mitigations by the variable read disturbance phenomenon.

Read disturbance in modern DRAM chips is a widespread weakness that is used for breaking memory isolation, one of the fundamental building blocks of system security and privacy. RowHammer is a prime example of read disturbance in DRAM where repeatedly accessing (hammering) a row of DRAM cells (DRAM row) induces bitflips in physically nearby DRAM rows (victim rows). Unfortunately, shrinking technology node size exacerbates RowHammer and as such, significantly fewer accesses can induce bitflips in newer DRAM chip generations. To ensure robust DRAM operation, state-of-the-art mitigation mechanisms restore the charge in potential victim rows (i.e., they perform preventive refresh or charge restoration). With newer DRAM chip generations, these mechanisms perform preventive refresh more aggressively and cause larger performance, energy, or area overheads. Therefore, it is essential to develop a better understanding and in-depth insights into the preventive refresh to secure real DRAM chips at low cost. In this paper, our goal is to mitigate RowHammer at low cost by understanding the preventive refresh latency and the impact of reduced refresh latency on RowHammer. To this end, we present the first rigorous experimental study on the interactions between refresh latency and RowHammer characteristics in real DRAM chips. Our experimental characterization using 388 real DDR4 DRAM chips from three major manufacturers demonstrates that a preventive refresh latency can be significantly reduced (by 64%) at the expense of requiring slightly more (by 0.54%) preventive refreshes. To investigate the impact of reduced preventive refresh latency on system performance and energy efficiency, we reduce the preventive refresh latency and adjust the aggressiveness of existing RowHammer solutions by developing a new mechanism, Partial Charge Restoration for Aggressive Mitigation (PaCRAM). Our results show that by reducing the preventive refresh latency, PaCRAM reduces the performance and energy overheads induced by five state-of-the-art RowHammer mitigation mechanisms with small additional area overhead. Thus, PaCRAM introduces a novel perspective into addressing RowHammer vulnerability at low cost by leveraging our experimental observations. To aid future research, we open-source our PaCRAM implementation at https://github.com/CMU-SAFARI/PaCRAM.

In this work, we experimentally demonstrate that it is possible to generate true random numbers at high throughput and low latency in commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) DRAM chips by leveraging simultaneous multiple-row activation (SiMRA) via an extensive characterization of 96 DDR4 DRAM chips. We rigorously analyze SiMRA's true random generation potential in terms of entropy, latency, and throughput for varying numbers of simultaneously activated DRAM rows (i.e., 2, 4, 8, 16, and 32), data patterns, temperature levels, and spatial variations. Among our 11 key experimental observations, we highlight four key results. First, we evaluate the quality of our TRNG designs using the commonly-used NIST statistical test suite for randomness and find that all SiMRA-based TRNG designs successfully pass each test. Second, 2-, 8-, 16-, and 32-row activation-based TRNG designs outperform the state-of-theart DRAM-based TRNG in throughput by up to 1.15×, 1.99×, 1.82×, and 1.39×, respectively. Third, SiMRA's entropy tends to increase with the number of simultaneously activated DRAM rows. For example, for most of the tested modules, the average entropy of 32-row activation is 2.51× higher than that of 2-row activation. Fourth, operational parameters and conditions (e.g., data pattern and temperature) significantly affect entropy. For example, increasing temperature from 50°C to 90°C decreases SiMRA's entropy by 1.53× for 32-row activation. To aid future research and development, we open-source our infrastructure at https://github.com/CMU-SAFARI/SiMRA-TRNG.

Processing-using-DRAM (PuD) is a promising paradigm for alleviating the data movement bottleneck using a DRAM array's massive internal parallelism and bandwidth to execute very wide dataparallel operations.Performing a PuD operation involves activating multiple DRAM rows in quick succession or simultaneously, i.e., multiple-row activation.Multiple-row activation is fundamentally different from conventional memory access patterns that activate one DRAM row at a time.However, repeatedly activating even one DRAM row (e.g., RowHammer) can induce bitflips in unaccessed DRAM rows because modern DRAM is subject to read disturbance, a worsening safety, security, and reliability issue.Unfortunately, no prior work investigates the effects of multiple-row activation, as commonly used by PuD operations, on DRAM read disturbance.In this paper, we present the first characterization study of read disturbance effects of multiple-row activation-based PuD (which we call PuDHammer) using 316 real DDR4 DRAM chips from four major DRAM manufacturers.Our detailed characterization results covering various operational conditions and parameters (i.e., temperature, data patterns, access patterns, timing parameters, and spatial variation) show that 1) PuDHammer significantly exacerbates the read disturbance vulnerability, causing up to 158.58× reduction in the minimum hammer count required to induce the first bitflip (𝐻𝐶 𝑓 𝑖𝑟𝑠𝑡 ), compared to RowHammer, 2) PuDHammer is affected by various operational conditions and parameters, 3) combining RowHammer with PuDHammer is more effective than using

DRAM chips are increasingly vulnerable to read disturbance phenomena (e.g., RowHammer and RowPress), where repeatedly accessing or keeping open a DRAM row causes bitflips in nearby rows, due to DRAM density scaling.Attackers can exploit RowHammer bitflips in real systems to compromise security, which has motivated many prior works on RowHammer defenses.To enable such defenses, recent DDR specifications introduce new defense frameworks (e.g., PRAC and RFM).For robust (i.e., secure, safe, and reliable) operation, it is critical to analyze security implications of widely-adopted RowHammer defenses.Yet, no prior work analyzes the timing covert channel and side channel vulnerabilities RowHammer defenses introduce.This paper presents the first analysis and evaluation of timing covert channel and side channel vulnerabilities introduced by stateof-the-art RowHammer defenses.We demonstrate that RowHammer defenses' preventive actions (e.g., preventively refreshing potential victim rows) have two fundamental features that allow an attacker to exploit RowHammer defenses for timing leakage.First, preventive actions often reduce DRAM bandwidth availability because they block access to DRAM, thereby resulting in significantly longer memory access latencies.Second, users can intentionally trigger preventive actions because preventive actions highly depend on application memory access patterns.We introduce LeakyHammer, a new class of attacks that leverage the RowHammer defense-induced memory latency differences to establish communication channels between processes and leak secrets from victim processes.First, we build two covert channel attacks exploiting two state-of-the-art RowHammer defenses (i.e., PRAC and RFM), achieving 39.0 Kbps and 48.7 Kbps channel capacity.Second, we demonstrate a proof-of-concept website

We experimentally demonstrate a new widespread read disturbance phenomenon, ColumnDisturb, in real commodity DRAM chips.By repeatedly opening or keeping a DRAM row (aggressor row) open, we show that it is possible to disturb DRAM cells through a DRAM column (i.e., bitline) and induce bitflips in DRAM cells sharing the same columns as the aggressor row (across multiple DRAM subarrays).With ColumnDisturb, the activation of a single row concurrently disturbs DRAM cells across as many as three DRAM subarrays (e.g., up to 3072 DRAM rows in tested DDR4 DRAM chips) as opposed to RowHammer & RowPress, which affect only a few neighboring rows of the aggressor row in a single subarray.We rigorously and comprehensively characterize ColumnDisturb and its characteristics under various operational conditions (i.e., temperature, data pattern, DRAM timing parameters, average voltage level of the bitline, memory access pattern, and spatial variation) using 216 DDR4 and 4 HBM2 chips from three major DRAM manufacturers.Among our 27 key experimental observations, we highlight two major results and their implications.First, ColumnDisturb affects chips from all three major DRAM manufacturers and worsens as DRAM technology scales down to smaller node sizes (e.g., the minimum time to induce the first Col-umnDisturb bitflip reduces by up to 5.06x and 2.96x on average across all tested modules).We observe that, even in existing DRAM chips, ColumnDisturb induces bitflips within a nominal DDR4 refresh window (e.g., in 63.6 ms) in multiple cells from one module.We predict that, as DRAM technology node size reduces, ColumnDisturb would worsen in future DRAM chips, likely causing many more bitflips in the nominal refresh window.Second, beyond the nominal refresh window, ColumnDisturb induces bitflips in many (up to 198x) more DRAM rows than retention failures.Therefore, Column-Disturb has strong implications for existing retention-aware refresh mechanisms that aim to improve system performance and energy efficiency by leveraging the heterogeneity in DRAM cell retention

We experimentally analyze the computational capability of commercial off-the-shelf(COTS) DRAM chips and the robustness of these capabilities under various timing delays between DRAM commands, data patterns, temperature, and voltage levels. We extensively characterize 120 COTS DDR4 chips from two major manufacturers. We highlight four key results of our study. First, COTS DRAM chips are capable of 1) simultaneously activating up to 32 rows (i.e., simultaneous many-row activation), 2) executing a majority of X (MAJX) operation where X>3 (i.e., MAJ5, MAJ7, and MAJ9 operations), and 3) copying a DRAM row (concurrently) to up to 31 other DRAM rows, which we call Multi-RowCopy. Second, storing multiple copies of MAJX's input operands on all simultaneously activated rows drastically increases the success rate (i.e., the percentage of DRAM cells that correctly perform the computation) of the MAJX operation. For example, MAJ3 with 32-row activation (i.e., replicating each MAJ3's input operands 10 times) has a 30.81% higher average success rate than MAJ3 with 4-row activation (i.e., no replication). Third, data pattern affects the success rate of MAJX and MUlti-RowCopy operations by 11.52% and 0.07% on average. Fourth, simultaneous many-row activation, MAJX, and Multi-RowCopy operations are highly resilient to temperature and voltage changes, with small success rate variations of at most 2.13% among all tested operations. We believe these empirical results demonstrate the promising potential of using DRAM as a computation substrate. To aid future research and development, we open-source our infrastructure at https://github.com/CMU-SAFARI/SiMRA-DRAM.

DRAM chips are increasingly more vulnerable to read-disturbance phenomena (e.g., RowHammer and RowPress), where repeatedly accessing DRAM rows causes bitflips in nearby rows due to DRAM density scaling. Under low RowHammer thresholds, existing RowHammer mitigations either incur high area overheads or degrade performance significantly. We propose a new RowHammer mitigation mechanism, CoMeT, that prevents RowHammer bitflips with low area, performance, and energy costs in DRAM-based systems at very low RowHammer thresholds. The key idea of CoMeT is to use low-cost and scalable hash-based counters to track DRAM row activations. CoMeT uses the Count-Min Sketch technique that maps each DRAM row to a group of counters, as uniquely as possible, using multiple hash functions. When a DRAM row is activated, CoMeT increments the counters mapped to that DRAM row. Because the mapping from DRAM rows to counters is not completely unique, activating one row can increment one or more counters mapped to another row. Thus, CoMeT may overestimate, but never underestimates, a DRAM row's activation count. This property of CoMeT allows it to securely prevent RowHammer bitflips while properly configuring its hash functions reduces overestimations. As a result, CoMeT 1) implements substantially fewer counters (e.g., thousands of counters) than the number of DRAM rows in a DRAM bank (e.g., 128K rows) and 2) does not significantly overestimate a DRAM row's activation count. We demonstrate that CoMeT securely prevents RowHammer bitflips at low area, performance, and energy cost. Our comprehensive evaluations show that CoMeT prevents RowHammer bitflips with an average performance overhead of only 0.19% and 4.01 % across 61 benign single-core workloads for a RowHammer threshold of 1K and a very low RowHammer threshold of 125, respectively, normalized to a system with no RowHammer mitigation. CoMeT achieves a good trade-off between performance, energy, and area overheads. Compared to the best prior performance- and energy-efficient RowHammer mitigation mechanism, CoMeT requires 5.4x and 74.2x less area overhead at RowHammer thresholds of 1K and 125, respectively, and incurs a small (≤ 1.75%) performance overhead on average, for all RowHammer thresholds. Compared to the best prior low-area-cost mitigation mechanism, at a very low RowHammer threshold of 125, CoMeT improves performance by up to 39.1% while incurring a similar area overhead. CoMeT is openly and freely available at https://github.com/CMU-SAFARI/CoMeT.

Processing-using-DRAM (PUD) is a processing-in-memory (PIM) approach that uses a DRAM array's massive internal parallelism to execute very-wide (e.g., 16,384-262,144-bit-wide) data-parallel operations, in a single-instruction multiple-data (SIMD) fashion. However, DRAM rows' large and rigid granularity limit the effectiveness and applicability of PUD in three ways. First, since applications have varying degrees of SIMD parallelism (which is often smaller than the DRAM row granularity), PUD execution often leads to underutilization, through-put loss, and energy waste. Second, due to the high area cost of implementing interconnects that connect columns in a wide DRAM row, most PUD architectures are limited to the execution of parallel map operations, where a single operation is performed over equally-sized input and output arrays. Third, the need to feed the wide DRAM row with tens of thousands of data elements combined with the lack of adequate compiler support for PUD systems create a programmability barrier, since programmers need to manually extract SIMD parallelism from an application and map computation to the PUD hardware. Our goal is to design a flexible PUD system that overcomes the limitations caused by the large and rigid granularity of PUD. To this end, we propose MIMDRAM, a hardware/software co-designed PUD system that introduces new mechanisms to allocate and control only the necessary resources for a given PUD operation. The key idea of MIMDRAM is to leverage fine-grained DRAM (i.e., the ability to independently access smaller segments of a large DRAM row) for PUD computation. MIMDRAM exploits this key idea to enable a multiple-instruction multiple-data (MIMD) execution model in each DRAM subarray (and SIMD execution within each DRAM row segment). We evaluate MIMDRAM using twelve real-world applications and 495 multi-programmed application mixes. Our evaluation shows that MIMDRAM provides 34 × the performance, 14.3 × the energy efficiency, 1.7 × the throughput, and 1.3 × the fairness of a state-of-the-art PUD framework, along with 30.6 × and 6.8 × the energy efficiency of a high-end CPU and GPU, respectively. MIMDRAM adds small area cost to a DRAM chip (1.11%) and CPU die (0.6%). We hope and believe that MIMDRAM's ideas and results will help to enable more efficient and easy-to-program PUD systems. To this end, we open source MIMDRAM at https://glthub.com/CMU-SAFARI/MIMDRAM.

Processing-using-DRAM (PuD) is an emerging paradigm that leverages the analog operational properties of DRAM circuitry to enable massively parallel in-DRAM computation. PuD has the potential to significantly reduce or eliminate costly data movement between processing elements and main memory. A common approach for PuD architectures is to make use of bulk bitwise computation (e.g., AND, OR, NOT). Prior works experimentally demonstrate three-input MAJ (i.e., MAJ3) and two-input AND and OR operations in commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) DRAM chips. Yet, demonstrations on COTS DRAM chips do not provide a functionally complete set of operations (e.g., NAND or AND and NOT). We experimentally df performing 1) functionally-complete Boolean operations: NOT, NAND, and NOR and 2) many-input (i.e., more than two-input) AND and OR operations. We present an extensive characterization of new bulk bitwise operations in 256 off-theshelf modern DDR4 DRAM chips. We evaluate the reliability of these operations using a metric called success rate: the fraction of correctly performed bitwise operations. Among our 19 new observations, we highlight four major results. First, we can perform the NOT operation on COTS DRAM chips with a 98.37% success rate on average. Second, we can perform up to 16-input NAND, NOR, AND, and OR operations on COTS DRAM chips with high reliability (e.g., 16-input NAND, NOR, AND, and OR with an average success rate of 94.94%, 95.87%, 94.94%, and 95.85%, respectively). Third, data pattern only slightly affects NAND, NOR, AND, and OR operations. Our results show that executing NAND, NOR, AND, and OR operations with random data patterns decreases the success rate compared to all logic-1/logic-0 patterns by 1.39%, 1.97%, 1.43%, and 1.98%, respectively. Fourth, NOT, NAND, NOR, AND, and OR operations are highly resilient to temperature changes, with small success rate fluctuations of at most 1.66% among all the tested operations when the temperature is increased from 50°C to 95°C. We believe these empirical results demonstrate the promising potential of using DRAM as a computation substrate.

Modern computing systems access data in main memory at coarse granularity (e.g., at 512-bit cache block granularity). Coarse-grained access leads to wasted energy because the system does not use all individually accessed small portions (e.g., words , each of which typically is 64 bits) of a cache block. In modern DRAM-based computing systems, two key coarse-grained access mechanisms lead to wasted energy: large and fixed-size (i) data transfers between DRAM and the memory controller and (ii) DRAM row activations. We propose Sectored DRAM, a new, low-overhead DRAM substrate that reduces wasted energy by enabling fine-grained DRAM data transfer and DRAM row activation. To retrieve only useful data from DRAM, Sectored DRAM exploits the observation that many cache blocks are not fully utilized in many workloads due to poor spatial locality. Sectored DRAM predicts the words in a cache block that will likely be accessed during the cache block’s residency in cache and (i) transfers only the predicted words on the memory channel by dynamically tailoring the DRAM data transfer size for the workload and (ii) activates a smaller set of cells that contain the predicted words by carefully operating physically isolated portions of DRAM rows (i.e., mats). Activating a smaller set of cells on each access relaxes DRAM power delivery constraints and allows the memory controller to schedule DRAM accesses faster. We evaluate Sectored DRAM using 41 workloads from widely used benchmark suites. Compared to a system with coarse-grained DRAM, Sectored DRAM reduces the DRAM energy consumption of highly memory intensive workloads by up to (on average) 33% (20%) while improving their performance by up to (on average) 36% (17%). Sectored DRAM’s DRAM energy savings, combined with its system performance improvement, allows system-wide energy savings of up to 23%. Sectored DRAM’s DRAM chip area overhead is 1.7% of the area of a modern DDR4 chip. Compared to state-of-the-art fine-grained DRAM architectures, Sectored DRAM greatly reduces DRAM energy consumption, does not reduce DRAM bandwidth, and can be implemented with low hardware cost. Sectored DRAM provides 89% of the performance benefits of, consumes 12% less DRAM energy than, and takes up 34% less DRAM chip area than a high-performance state-of-the-art fine-grained DRAM architecture (Half-DRAM). It is our hope and belief that Sectored DRAM’s ideas and results will help to enable more efficient and high-performance memory systems. To this end, we open source Sectored DRAM at https://github.com/CMU-SAFARI/Sectored-DRAM.

Conventional virtual memory (VM) frameworks enable a virtual address to flexibly map to any physical address. This flexibility necessitates large data structures to store virtual-to-physical mappings, which leads to high address translation latency and large translation-induced interference in the memory hierarchy, especially in data-intensive workloads. On the other hand, restricting the address mapping so that a virtual address can only map to a specific set of physical addresses can significantly reduce address translation overheads by making use of compact and efficient translation structures. However, restricting the address mapping flexibility across the entire main memory severely limits data sharing across different processes and increases data accesses to the swap space of the storage device even in the presence of free memory.

Address translation is a performance bottleneck in data-intensive workloads due to large datasets and irregular access patterns that lead to frequent high-latency page table walks (PTWs). PTWs can be reduced by using (i) large hardware TLBs or (ii) large software-managed TLBs. Unfortunately, both solutions have significant drawbacks: increased access latency, power and area (for hardware TLBs), and costly memory accesses, the need for large contiguous memory blocks, and complex OS modifications (for software-managed TLBs).

Random number generation is an important task in a wide variety of critical applications including cryptographic algorithms, scientific simulations, and industrial testing tools. True Random Number Generators (TRNGs) produce cryptographically-secure truly random data by sampling a physical entropy source that typically requires custom hardware and suffers from long latency. To enable high-bandwidth and low-latency TRNGs on widely-available commodity devices, recent works propose hardware TRNGs that generate random numbers using commodity DRAM as an entropy source. Although prior works demonstrate promising TRNG mechanisms using DRAM, practical integration of such mechanisms into real systems poses various challenges.We identify three key challenges for using DRAM-based TRNGs in current systems: (1) generating random numbers with DRAM-based TRNGs can degrade overall system performance by slowing down concurrently-running applications due to the interference between RNG and regular memory operations in the memory controller (i.e., RNG interference), (2) this RNG interference can degrade system fairness by causing unfair prioritization of applications that intensively use random numbers (i.e., RNG applications), and (3) RNG applications can experience significant slowdown due to the high latency of DRAM-based TRNGs.To address these challenges, we propose DR-STRaNGe, an end-to-end system design for DRAM-based TRNGs that (1) reduces the RNG interference by separating RNG requests from regular memory requests in the memory controller, (2) improves fairness across applications with an RNG-aware memory request scheduler, and (3) hides the large TRNG latencies using a random number buffering mechanism combined with a new DRAM idleness predictor that accurately identifies idle DRAM periods.We evaluate DR-STRaNGe using a comprehensive set of 186 multi-programmed workloads. Compared to an RNG-oblivious baseline system, DR-STRaNGe improves the performance of non-RNG and RNG applications on average by 17.9% and 25.1%, respectively. DR-STRaNGe improves system fairness by 32.1% on average when generating random numbers at a 5 Gb/s throughput. DR-STRaNGe reduces energy consumption by 21% compared to the RNG-oblivious baseline design by reducing the time spent for RNG and non-RNG memory accesses by 15.8%.

This article introduces the first open-source FPGA-based infrastructure, MetaSys, with a prototype in a RISC-V system, to enable the rapid implementation and evaluation of a wide range of cross-layer techniques in real hardware. Hardware-software cooperative techniques are powerful approaches to improving the performance, quality of service, and security of general-purpose processors. They are, however, typically challenging to rapidly implement and evaluate in real hardware as they require full-stack changes to the hardware, system software, and instruction-set architecture (ISA). MetaSys implements a rich hardware-software interface and lightweight metadata support that can be used as a common basis to rapidly implement and evaluate new cross-layer techniques. We demonstrate MetaSys’s versatility and ease-of-use by implementing and evaluating three cross-layer techniques for: (i) prefetching in graph analytics; (ii) bounds checking in memory unsafe languages, and (iii) return address protection in stack frames; each technique requiring only ~100 lines of Chisel code over MetaSys. Using MetaSys, we perform the first detailed experimental study to quantify the performance overheads of using a single metadata management system to enable multiple cross-layer optimizations in CPUs. We identify the key sources of bottlenecks and system inefficiency of a general metadata management system. We design MetaSys to minimize these inefficiencies and provide increased versatility compared to previously proposed metadata systems. Using three use cases and a detailed characterization, we demonstrate that a common metadata management system can be used to efficiently support diverse cross-layer techniques in CPUs. MetaSys is completely and freely available at https://github.com/CMU-SAFARI/MetaSys .

True random number generators (TRNG) sample random physical processes to create large amounts of random numbers for various use cases, including security-critical cryptographic primitives, scientific simulations, machine learning applications, and even recreational entertainment. Unfortunately, not every computing system is equipped with dedicated TRNG hardware, limiting the application space and security guarantees for such systems. To open the application space and enable security guarantees for the overwhelming majority of computing systems that do not necessarily have dedicated TRNG hardware (e.g., processing-in-memory systems), we develop QUAC-TRNG, a new high-throughput TRNG that can be fully implemented in commodity DRAM chips, which are key components in most modern systems.QUAC-TRNG exploits the new observation that a carefully-engineered sequence of DRAM commands activates four consecutive DRAM rows in rapid succession. This QUadruple ACtivation (QUAC) causes the bitline sense amplifiers to non-deterministically converge to random values when we activate four rows that store conflicting data because the net deviation in bitline voltage fails to meet reliable sensing margins.We experimentally demonstrate that QUAC reliably generates random values across 136 commodity DDR4 DRAM chips from one major DRAM manufacturer. We describe how to develop an effective TRNG (QUAC-TRNG) based on QUAC. We evaluate the quality of our TRNG using the commonly-used NIST statistical test suite for randomness and find that QUAC-TRNG successfully passes each test. Our experimental evaluations show that QUAC-TRNG reliably generates true random numbers with a throughput of 3.44 Gb/s (per DRAM channel), outperforming the state-of-the-art DRAM-based TRNG by 15.08× and 1.41× for basic and throughput-optimized versions, respectively. We show that QUAC-TRNG utilizes DRAM bandwidth better than the state-of-the-art, achieving up to 2.03× the throughput of a throughput-optimized baseline when scaling bus frequencies to 12 GT/s.