EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nikita Bhalla
dblp:293/7067
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-2977-3448ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Information retrieval · 71% Knowledge graphs · 11% Web and social media mining · 9% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
retrieval-augmented generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | CRAG - Comprehensive RAG Benchmark · NeurIPS 2024 |
Information retrieval › question answering
question answering benchmark |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | CRAG - Comprehensive RAG Benchmark · NeurIPS 2024 |
Information retrieval
retrieval evaluation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | CRAG - Comprehensive RAG Benchmark · NeurIPS 2024 |
Computational social science and digital humanities
opinion dynamics |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Local Edge Dynamics and Opinion Polarization · WSDM 2023 |
Computational social science and digital humanities › opinion dynamics
opinion polarization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Local Edge Dynamics and Opinion Polarization · WSDM 2023 |
Knowledge graphs
knowledge graph exploration |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | CRAG - Comprehensive RAG Benchmark · NeurIPS 2024 |
Data mining › network analysis
network dynamics |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Local Edge Dynamics and Opinion Polarization · WSDM 2023 |
Web and social media mining › social network analysis
social network |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Local Edge Dynamics and Opinion Polarization · WSDM 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
retrieval-augmented generation · 1.5friedkin-johnsen model · 1.3agent-based simulation · 1.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Local Edge Dynamics and Opinion PolarizationabstractThe proliferation of social media platforms, recommender systems, and their joint societal impacts have prompted significant interest in opinion formation and evolution within social networks. We study how local edge dynamics can drive opinion polarization. In particular, we introduce a variant of the classic Friedkin-Johnsen opinion dynamics, augmented with a simple time-evolving network model. Edges are iteratively added or deleted according to simple rules, modeling decisions based on individual preferences and network recommendations. Via simulations on synthetic and real-world graphs, we find that the combined presence of two dynamics gives rise to high polarization: (1) confirmation bias —i.e., the preference for nodes to connect to other nodes with similar expressed opinions and (2) friend-of-friend link recommendations , which encourage new connections between closely connected nodes. We show that our model is tractable to theoretical analysis, which helps explain how these local dynamics erode connectivity across opinion groups, affecting polarization and a related measure of disagreement across edges. Finally, we validate our model against real-world data, showing that our edge dynamics drive the structure of arbitrary graphs, including random graphs, to more closely resemble real social networks. Our code and supplemental materials are available at https://github.com/adamlechowicz/opinion-polarization/ . 1 Nikita Bhalla, Adam Lechowicz, Cameron Musco |
ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. | 1 |
| 2024 | CRAG - Comprehensive RAG BenchmarkabstractRetrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has recently emerged as a promising solution to alleviate Large Language Model (LLM)’s deficiency in lack of knowledge. Existing RAG datasets, however, do not adequately represent the diverse and dynamic nature of real-world Question Answering (QA) tasks. To bridge this gap, we introduce the Comprehensive RAG Benchmark (CRAG), a factual question answering benchmark of 4,409 question-answer pairs and mock APIs to simulate web and Knowledge Graph (KG) search. CRAG is designed to encapsulate a diverse array of questions across five domains and eight question categories, reflecting varied entity popularity from popular to long-tail, and temporal dynamisms ranging from years to seconds. Our evaluation on this benchmark highlights the gap to fully trustworthy QA. Whereas most advanced LLMs achieve $\le 34\%$ accuracy on CRAG, adding RAG in a straightforward manner improves the accuracy only to 44%. State-of-the-art industry RAG solutions only answer 63% questions without any hallucination. CRAG also reveals much lower accuracy in answering questions regarding facts with higher dynamism, lower popularity, or higher complexity, suggesting future research directions. The CRAG benchmark laid the groundwork for a KDD Cup 2024 challenge, attracted thousands of participants and submissions. We commit to maintaining CRAG to serve research communities in advancing RAG solutions and general QA solutions. CRAG is available at https://github.com/facebookresearch/CRAG/. Kai Sun 0006, Hao Xin, Yushi Sun, Nikita Bhalla, Xiangsen Chen, Sajal Choudhary, Rongze Daniel Gui, Ziran Will Jiang, Ziyu Jiang, Lingkun Kong, Brian Moran, Eting Yuan, Hanwen Zha, Nan Tang 0001, Lei Chen 0002, Nicolas Scheffer, Rakesh Wanga, Scott Yih, Xin Dong 0001 |
NeurIPS | 5 |
| 2023 | Local Edge Dynamics and Opinion PolarizationabstractThe proliferation of social media platforms, recommender systems, and their joint societal impacts have prompted significant interest in opinion formation and evolution within social networks. We study how local edge dynamics can drive opinion polarization. In particular, we introduce a variant of the classic Friedkin-Johnsen opinion dynamics, augmented with a simple time-evolving network model. Edges are iteratively added or deleted according to simple rules, modeling decisions based on individual preferences and network recommendations. Nikita Bhalla, Adam Lechowicz, Cameron Musco |
WSDM | 1 |