Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Christian Horvat

dblp:293/8018 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 first-author · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Representation and self-supervised learning · 35% Generative modeling · 33% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 32%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
density estimation
1.422024
On gauge freedom, conservativity and intrinsic dimensionality estimation in diffusion models · ICLR 2024
Density estimation on low-dimensional manifolds: an inflation-deflation approach · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction › manifold learning › intrinsic dimension
intrinsic dimension estimation
1.322024
On gauge freedom, conservativity and intrinsic dimensionality estimation in diffusion models · ICLR 2024
Intrinsic dimensionality estimation using Normalizing Flows · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Generative modeling
normalizing flow
1.332023
Density estimation on low-dimensional manifolds: an inflation-deflation approach · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Denoising Normalizing Flow · NeurIPS 2021
Intrinsic dimensionality estimation using Normalizing Flows · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
manifold learning
0.922024
On gauge freedom, conservativity and intrinsic dimensionality estimation in diffusion models · ICLR 2024
Denoising Normalizing Flow · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
0.812024
On gauge freedom, conservativity and intrinsic dimensionality estimation in diffusion models · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › density estimation
density estimation on manifolds
0.712023
Density estimation on low-dimensional manifolds: an inflation-deflation approach · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

score matching · 0.8gauge freedom analysis · 0.8normalizing flow · 0.7noise inflation · 0.7manifold deflation · 0.7singular value analysis · 0.6nearest neighbor statistics · 0.6denoising autoencoder · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 On gauge freedom, conservativity and intrinsic dimensionality estimation in diffusion models
abstract
Diffusion models are generative models that have recently demonstrated impressive performances in terms of sampling quality and density estimation in high dimensions. They rely on a forward continuous diffusion process and a backward continuous denoising process, which can be described by a time-dependent vector field and is used as a generative model. In the original formulation of the diffusion model, this vector field is assumed to be the score function (i.e. it is the gradient of the log-probability at a given time in the diffusion process). Curiously, on the practical side, most studies on diffusion models implement this vector field as a neural network function and do not constrain it be the gradient of some energy function (that is, most studies do not constrain the vector field to be conservative). Even though some studies investigated empirically whether such a constraint will lead to a performance gain, they lead to contradicting results and failed to provide analytical results. Here, we provide three analytical results regarding the extent of the modeling freedom of this vector field. {Firstly, we propose a novel decomposition of vector fields into a conservative component and an orthogonal component which satisfies a given (gauge) freedom. Secondly, from this orthogonal decomposition, we show that exact density estimation and exact sampling is achieved when the conservative component is exactly equals to the true score and therefore conservativity is neither necessary nor sufficient to obtain exact density estimation and exact sampling. Finally, we show that when it comes to inferring local information of the data manifold, constraining the vector field to be conservative is desirable.
Christian Horvat, Jean-Pascal Pfister
ICLR1
2023 Density estimation on low-dimensional manifolds: an inflation-deflation approach
abstract
Normalizing flows (NFs) are universal density estimators based on neural networks. However, this universality is limited: the density's support needs to be diffeomorphic to a Euclidean space. In this paper, we propose a novel method to overcome this limitation without sacrificing universality. The proposed method inflates the data manifold by adding noise in the normal space, trains an NF on this inflated manifold, and, finally, deflates the learned density. Our main result provides sufficient conditions on the manifold and the specific choice of noise under which the corresponding estimator is exact. Our method has the same computational complexity as NFs and does not require computing an inverse flow. We also demonstrate theoretically (under certain conditions) and empirically (on a wide range of toy examples) that noise in the normal space can be well approximated by Gaussian noise. This allows using our method for approximating arbitrary densities on unknown manifolds provided that the manifold dimension is known.
Christian Horvat, Jean-Pascal Pfister
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2022 Intrinsic dimensionality estimation using Normalizing Flows
abstract
How many degrees of freedom are there in a dataset consisting of $M$ samples embedded in $\mathbb{R}^D$? This number, formally known as \textsl{intrinsic dimensionality}, can be estimated using nearest neighbor statistics. However, nearest neighbor statistics do not scale to large datasets as their complexity scales quadratically in $M$, $\mathcal{O}(M^2)$. Additionally, methods based on nearest neighbor statistics perform poorly on datasets embedded in high dimensions where $D\gg 1$. In this paper, we propose a novel method to estimate the intrinsic dimensionality using Normalizing Flows that scale to large datasets and high dimensions. The method is based on some simple back-of-the-envelope calculations predicting how the singular values of the flow's Jacobian change when inflating the dataset with different noise magnitudes. Singular values associated with directions normal to the manifold evolve differently than singular values associated with directions tangent to the manifold. We test our method on various datasets, including 64x64 RGB images, where we achieve state-of-the-art results.
Christian Horvat, Jean-Pascal Pfister
NeurIPS1
2021 Denoising Normalizing Flow
abstract
Normalizing flows (NF) are expressive as well as tractable density estimation methods whenever the support of the density is diffeomorphic to the entire data-space. However, real-world data sets typically live on (or very close to) low-dimensional manifolds thereby challenging the applicability of standard NF on real-world problems. Here we propose a novel method - called Denoising Normalizing Flow (DNF) - that estimates the density on the low-dimensional manifold while learning the manifold as well. The DNF works in 3 steps. First, it inflates the manifold - making it diffeomorphic to the entire data-space. Secondly, it learns an NF on the inflated manifold and finally it learns a denoising mapping - similarly to denoising autoencoders. The DNF relies on a single cost function and does not require to alternate between a density estimation phase and a manifold learning phase - as it is the case with other recent methods. Furthermore, we show that the DNF can learn meaningful low-dimensional representations from naturalistic images as well as generate high-quality samples.
Christian Horvat, Jean-Pascal Pfister
NeurIPS1